Literature DB >> 20943881

Immune responses and protection against experimental Brucella suis biovar 1 challenge in nonvaccinated or B. abortus strain RB51-vaccinated cattle.

S C Olsen1, S G Hennager.   

Abstract

Twenty Hereford heifers approximately 9 months of age were vaccinated with saline (control) or 2 × 10(10) CFU of the Brucella abortus strain RB51 (RB51) vaccine. Immunologic responses after inoculation demonstrated significantly greater (P < 0.05) antibody and proliferative responses to RB51 antigens in cattle vaccinated with RB51 than in the controls. Pregnant cattle received a conjunctival challenge at approximately 6 months of gestation with 10(7) CFU of B. suis bv. 1 strains isolated from naturally infected cattle. The fluorescence polarization assay and the buffered acid plate agglutination test had the highest sensitivities in detecting B. suis-infected cattle between 2 and 12 weeks after experimental infection. Serologic responses and lymphocyte proliferative responses to B. suis antigens did not differ between control and RB51 vaccinees after experimental infection. No abortions occurred in cattle in either treatment group after challenge, although there appeared to be an increased incidence of retained placenta after parturition in both the control and the RB51 vaccination treatment groups. Our data suggest that the mammary gland is a preferred site for B. suis localization in cattle. Vaccination with RB51 did not reduce B. suis infection rates in maternal or fetal tissues. In conclusion, although B. suis is unlikely to cause abortions and fetal losses in cattle, our data suggest that RB51 vaccination will not protect cattle against B. suis infection after exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20943881      PMCID: PMC3008196          DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00326-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol        ISSN: 1556-679X


  14 in total

1.  Responses of adult cattle to vaccination with a reduced dose of Brucella abortus strain RB51.

Authors:  S C Olsen
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.534

2.  Brucella suis biovar 1 in naturally infected cattle: a bacteriological, serological, and histological study.

Authors:  D R Ewalt; J B Payeur; J C Rhyan; P L Geer
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.279

3.  Isolation of Brucella suis from cattle.

Authors:  D R Cook; J W Noble
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 1.281

4.  The identity, distribution and epizootiological significance of brucella isolates in Australia, 1981 to 1985.

Authors:  R Crichton; N E Medveczky
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 5.  Physiology and treatment of retained fetal membranes in cattle.

Authors:  J C Beagley; K J Whitman; K E Baptiste; J Scherzer
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  A comparison of five serological tests for bovine brucellosis.

Authors:  I R Dohoo; P F Wright; G M Ruckerbauer; B S Samagh; F J Robertson; L B Forbes
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.310

7.  Brucella suis infection in pregnant cattle.

Authors:  J H Norton; A D Thomas
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.281

8.  Effects of age at vaccination on efficacy of Brucella abortus strain RB51 to protect cattle against brucellosis.

Authors:  N F Cheville; S C Olsen; A E Jensen; M G Stevens; M V Palmer; A M Florance
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.156

9.  Differentiation of Brucella abortus bv. 1, 2, and 4, Brucella melitensis, Brucella ovis, and Brucella suis bv. 1 by PCR.

Authors:  B J Bricker; S M Halling
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Validation of FPA and cELISA for the detection of antibodies to Brucella abortus in cattle sera and comparison to SAT, CFT, and iELISA.

Authors:  J A McGiven; J D Tucker; L L Perrett; J A Stack; S D Brew; A P MacMillan
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.303

View more
  3 in total

1.  In vivo differences in the virulence, pathogenicity, and induced protective immunity of wboA mutants from genetically different parent Brucella spp.

Authors:  Zhen Wang; Jianrui Niu; Shuangshan Wang; Yanli Lv; Qingmin Wu
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2012-12-12

2.  Progress in Brucella vaccine development.

Authors:  Xinghong Yang; Jerod A Skyberg; Ling Cao; Beata Clapp; Theresa Thornburg; David W Pascual
Journal:  Front Biol (Beijing)       Date:  2013-02-01

3.  Coincidence cloning recovery of Brucella melitensis RNA from goat tissues: advancing the in vivo analysis of pathogen gene expression in brucellosis.

Authors:  Paola M Boggiatto; Daniel Fitzsimmons; Darrell O Bayles; David Alt; Catherine E Vrentas; Steven C Olsen
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.946

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.