Literature DB >> 20943841

The sonographic Ottawa Foot and Ankle Rules study (the SOFAR study).

Marieta D Canagasabey1, Michael J Callaghan, Simon Carley.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Foot and ankle injuries are common in the Emergency Department (ED). Of those requiring radiographs in accordance with the Ottawa Foot and Ankle Rules, approximately 22% have a fracture. Ultrasound is developing as a tool for emergency musculoskeletal assessment--it is inexpensive and rapid, and visualises soft tissue and bony structures.
METHODS: This diagnostic cohort study examined if ultrasound could detect acute bony foot and ankle injuries. Ottawa Rules-positive patients over 16 years were eligible. An ultrasound scan (USS) was performed blind to radiograph findings by an ED member. Patient management was according to radiograph. Significant fractures were defined as per the Ottawa Foot and Ankle Rules study group. All radiographic reporting was conducted blind to USS findings. All USS operators received specific 2-day training in musculoskeletal ultrasound.
RESULTS: 110 subjects were recruited. 11 had significant radiological fractures, and 10 were seen on ultrasound. The single missed fracture arose due to the operator not scanning proximally enough on the fibula. On rescanning following radiograph review, the fracture was clearly seen. The sensitivity of USS is 90.9% (95% CI 65.7 to 98.3), and the specificity is 90.9% (95% CI 88.1 to 91.7). The positive predictive value is 0.526 (95% CI 0.380 to 0.569). The negative predictive value is 0.989 (95% CI 0.959 to 0.998). The positive likelihood ratio is 10.00 (95% CI 5.526 to 11.901), and the negative likelihood ratio is 0.100 (95% CI 0.018 to 0.389).
CONCLUSION: This pilot study demonstrates that ultrasound shows great promise for the sensitive detection of foot and ankle fractures, thus identifying patients who require radiographic evaluation more efficiently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20943841     DOI: 10.1136/emj.2009.088286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  15 in total

1.  A physiotherapy perspective of musculoskeletal imaging in sport.

Authors:  M J Callaghan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  The Investigation of Suspected Fracture-a Comparison of Ultrasound With Conventional Imaging.

Authors:  Gordian Lukas Schmid; Stefan Lippmann; Susanne Unverzagt; Christiane Hofmann; Tobias Deutsch; Thomas Frese
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Diagnostic Ultrasonography of an Ankle Fracture Undetectable by Conventional Radiography: A Case Report.

Authors:  Clinton J Daniels; Aaron B Welk; Dennis E Enix
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-02-26

4.  Extremity CT and ultrasound in the assessment of ankle injuries: occult fractures and ligament injuries.

Authors:  Georgina M Allen; David J Wilson; Stuart A Bullock; Marion Watson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of traumatic ankle injury.

Authors:  Mehrdad Esmailian; Mahdi Ataie; Omid Ahmadi; Shirvan Rastegar; Atoosa Adibi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  Screening Characteristics of Ultrasonography in Detection of Ankle Fractures.

Authors:  Majid Shojaee; Farhad Hakimzadeh; Parisa Mohammadi; Anita Sabzghabaei; Mohammad Manouchehrifar; Ali Arhami Dolatabadi
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2016-11

7.  Point-of-care bedside ultrasound examination for the exclusion of clinically significant ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures; a single blinded prospective diagnostic cohort study.

Authors:  Aniek Crombach; Nasim Azizi; Heleen Lameijer; Mostafa El Moumni; Jan C Ter Maaten
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  The effectiveness of ultrasound in the detection of fractures in adults with suspected upper or lower limb injury: a systematic review and subgroup meta-analysis.

Authors:  Natalie Champagne; Leila Eadie; Luke Regan; Philip Wilson
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2019-01-28

9.  Clinical value of the Ottawa ankle rules for diagnosis of fractures in acute ankle injuries.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Shi-min Chang; Guang-rong Yu; Zhi-tao Rao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Ottawa ankle rules and subjective surgeon perception to evaluate radiograph necessity following foot and ankle sprain.

Authors:  Res Pires; Aa Pereira; Gm Abreu-E-Silva; Pj Labronici; Lb Figueiredo; Al Godoy-Santos; M Kfuri
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2014-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.