Literature DB >> 20943679

The evolution of eusociality in allodapine bees: workers began by waiting.

Michael P Schwarz1, Simon M Tierney, Sandra M Rehan, Luke B Chenoweth, Steven J B Cooper.   

Abstract

Understanding how sterile worker castes in social insects first evolved is one of the supreme puzzles in social evolution. Here, we show that in the bee tribe Allodapini, the earliest societies did not entail a foraging worker caste, but instead comprised females sharing a nest with supersedure of dominance. Subordinates delayed foraging until they became reproductively active, whereupon they provided food for their own brood as well as for those of previously dominant females. The earliest allodapine societies are, therefore, not consistent with an 'evo-devo' paradigm, where decoupling of foraging and reproductive tasks is proposed as a key early step in social evolution. Important features of these ancestral societies were insurance benefits for dominants, headstart benefits for subordinates and direct reproduction for both. The two lineages where morphologically distinct foraging worker castes evolved both occur in ecosystems with severe constraints on independent nesting and where brood rearing periods are very seasonally restricted. These conditions would have strongly curtailed dispersal options and increased the likelihood that dominance supersedure occurred after brood rearing opportunities were largely degraded. The origins of foraging castes, therefore, represented a shift towards assured fitness gains by subordinates, mediated by the dual constraints of social hierarchies and environmental harshness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20943679      PMCID: PMC3061166          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  9 in total

1.  Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies.

Authors:  Mark Pagel; Andrew Meade; Daniel Barker
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  Complex social behaviour derived from maternal reproductive traits.

Authors:  Gro V Amdam; Angela Csondes; M Kim Fondrk; Robert E Page
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Recent and simultaneous origins of eusociality in halictid bees.

Authors:  Seán G Brady; Sedonia Sipes; Adam Pearson; Bryan N Danforth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The evolution of eusociality: Reproductive head starts of workers.

Authors:  D C Queller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Bayesian inference of character evolution.

Authors:  Fredrik Ronquist
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Group size and direct fitness in social queues.

Authors:  Gavin Shreeves; Jeremy Field
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 7.  Changing paradigms in insect social evolution: insights from halictine and allodapine bees.

Authors:  Michael P Schwarz; Miriam H Richards; Bryan N Danforth
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 19.686

Review 8.  Evo-devo and the evolution of social behavior.

Authors:  Amy L Toth; Gene E Robinson
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  Social complexity in bees is not sufficient to explain lack of reversions to solitary living over long time scales.

Authors:  Luke B Chenoweth; Simon M Tierney; Jaclyn A Smith; Steven J B Cooper; Michael P Schwarz
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 3.260

  9 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Beyond promiscuity: mate-choice commitments in social breeding.

Authors:  Jacobus J Boomsma
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Extreme reproductive skew at the dawn of sociality is consistent with inclusive fitness theory but problematic for routes to eusociality.

Authors:  Lucas R Hearn; Olivia K Davies; Michael P Schwarz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.530

3.  Social consequences of energetically costly nest construction in a facultatively social bee.

Authors:  Madeleine M Ostwald; Trevor P Fox; Jon F Harrison; Jennifer H Fewell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  A mid-cretaceous origin of sociality in xylocopine bees with only two origins of true worker castes indicates severe barriers to eusociality.

Authors:  Sandra M Rehan; Remko Leys; Michael P Schwarz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  At the brink of eusociality: transcriptomic correlates of worker behaviour in a small carpenter bee.

Authors:  Sandra M Rehan; Ali J Berens; Amy L Toth
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Sociality sculpts similar patterns of molecular evolution in two independently evolved lineages of eusocial bees.

Authors:  Wyatt A Shell; Michael A Steffen; Hannah K Pare; Arun S Seetharam; Andrew J Severin; Amy L Toth; Sandra M Rehan
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-02-26

7.  First evidence for a massive extinction event affecting bees close to the K-T boundary.

Authors:  Sandra M Rehan; Remko Leys; Michael P Schwarz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.