Literature DB >> 20942984

Supporting tough decisions in Norway: a healthcare system approach.

Berit Mørland1, Anen Ringard, John-Arne Røttingen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We describe, in general, the principles used in priority setting and, in particular, policy processes and decision making in Norway.
METHODS: A newly established council for setting priorities in health care is presented to illustrate how health technology assessments (HTAs) can support national advisors in complex priority-setting processes. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Setting priorities in health care is a complex task. Careful thinking is, therefore, required in determining the components of a system for priority-setting. Based on recent Norwegian experiences, we believe that the following generic parts may provide some of the solution: a common set of values; an organizational structure made up of key stakeholders; supporting mechanisms in the form of HTA organizations and documented best evidence; and loyalty to decisions by stakeholders responsible for implementing national policies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20942984     DOI: 10.1017/S0266462310001030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  7 in total

1.  Do organizational and clinical ethics in a hospital setting need different venues?

Authors:  Reidun Førde; Thor Willy Ruud Hansen
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2014-06

2.  Focus groups highlight that many patients object to clinicians' focusing on costs.

Authors:  Roseanna Sommers; Susan Dorr Goold; Elizabeth A McGlynn; Steven D Pearson; Marion Danis
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Health care priority setting in Norway a multicriteria decision analysis.

Authors:  Thierry Defechereux; Francesco Paolucci; Andrew Mirelman; Sitaporn Youngkong; Grete Botten; Terje P Hagen; Louis W Niessen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  A flexible formula for incorporating distributive concerns into cost-effectiveness analyses: Priority weights.

Authors:  Øystein Ariansen Haaland; Frode Lindemark; Kjell Arne Johansson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Systematic review for the development of a pharmaceutical and medical products prioritization framework.

Authors:  Alberto Frutos Pérez-Surio; Mercedes Gimeno-Gracia; Ma Aránzazu Alcácera López; Ma Asunción Sagredo Samanes; Ma Del Puerto Pardo Jario; Ma Del Tránsito Salvador Gómez
Journal:  J Pharm Policy Pract       Date:  2019-08-21

6.  Public participation: healthcare rationing in the newspaper media.

Authors:  Audun Brendbekken; Bjarne Robberstad; Ole F Norheim
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Roles and responsibilities of clinical ethics committees in priority setting.

Authors:  Morten Magelssen; Ingrid Miljeteig; Reidar Pedersen; Reidun Førde
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.652

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.