Literature DB >> 20942727

Spermatogenesis affects the outcome of ICSI for azoospermic patients rather than sperm retrieval method.

Xiaojin He1, Yunxia Cao, Zhiguo Zhang, Jihua Zhao, Zhaolian Wei, Ping Zhou, Lin Cong.   

Abstract

The study investigated the clinical outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with epididymal and testicular sperm of azoospermic patients exhibiting various disturbances in spermatogenesis, in order to understand the possible factors that might affect ICSI outcome. Of the 134 patients, 92 were diagnosed as being obstructive azoospermic (OA group) with normal spermatogenesis and the remaining 42 patients were diagnosed as being non-obstructive azoospermic (NOA group) with hypospermatogenesis. The 92 OA patients underwent 112 ICSI cycles, which were divided into two subgroups according to their sperm retrieval methods: 1) OA-PESA group (n=51) with sperm obtained by percutaneous sperm aspiration (PESA) cycles and 2) OA-TEFNA group (n=61) with sperm obtained by testicular fine needle sperm aspiration (TEFNA) cycles. The NOA patients diagnosed with hypospermatogenesis according to histopathological analysis and hormone analysis, underwent 42 ICSI cycles with TEFNA. The results showed that the fertilization, cleavage, and clinical pregnancy rates portrayed a significant difference (44.9% vs. 64.1%, P<0.001, 79.8% vs. 89.0%, P<0.001, and 21.4% vs. 40.2%, P=0.047, respectively) between NOA and OA groups. Moreover, the miscarriage rate in the NOA group was visibly higher even though it did not reach a statistical difference (33.3% vs. 15.6%, P=0.433) compared with the miscarriage rate of the OA group. The same statistical differences were observed between the subgroup OA-TEFNA and the NOA group. No statistical difference was observed between OA-PESA and OA-TEFNA groups for the fertilization, cleavage, clinical pregnancy, and miscarriage rates. This study indicates that defective spermatogenesis affects the ICSI clinical outcome of azoospermic patients rather than the sperm retrieval methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20942727     DOI: 10.3109/19396368.2010.513078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol Reprod Med        ISSN: 1939-6368            Impact factor:   3.061


  5 in total

Review 1.  Novel concepts in male factor infertility: clinical and laboratory perspectives.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Clinical management of infertile men with nonobstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Comparison of sperm retrieval and reproductive outcome in azoospermic men with testicular failure and obstructive azoospermia treated for infertility.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Christina Prudencio; Bill Seol; Sidney Verza; Christopher Knoedler; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 4.  Reproductive outcomes, including neonatal data, following sperm injection in men with obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia: case series and systematic review.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

5.  A single-center study examining the outcomes of percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration in the treatment of obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Jason R Kovac; Kyle J Lehmann; Marc Anthony Fischer
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2014-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.