Literature DB >> 20942407

Controlling electron transfer in donor-bridge-acceptor molecules using cross-conjugated bridges.

Annie Butler Ricks1, Gemma C Solomon, Michael T Colvin, Amy M Scott, Kun Chen, Mark A Ratner, Michael R Wasielewski.   

Abstract

Photoinitiated charge separation (CS) and recombination (CR) in a series of donor-bridge-acceptor (D-B-A) molecules with cross-conjugated, linearly conjugated, and saturated bridges have been compared and contrasted using time-resolved spectroscopy. The photoexcited charge transfer state of 3,5-dimethyl-4-(9-anthracenyl)julolidine (DMJ-An) is the donor, and naphthalene-1,8:4,5-bis(dicarboximide) (NI) is the acceptor in all cases, along with 1,1-diphenylethene, trans-stilbene, diphenylmethane, and xanthone bridges. Photoinitiated CS through the cross-conjugated 1,1-diphenylethene bridge is about 30 times slower than through its linearly conjugated trans-stilbene counterpart and is comparable to that observed through the diphenylmethane bridge. This result implies that cross-conjugation strongly decreases the π orbital contribution to the donor-acceptor electronic coupling so that electron transfer most likely uses the bridge σ system as its primary CS pathway. In contrast, the CS rate through the cross-conjugated xanthone bridge is comparable to that observed through the linearly conjugated trans-stilbene bridge. Molecular conductance calculations on these bridges show that cross-conjugation results in quantum interference effects that greatly alter the through-bridge donor-acceptor electronic coupling as a function of charge injection energy. These calculations display trends that agree well with the observed trends in the electron transfer rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20942407     DOI: 10.1021/ja107420a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  10 in total

1.  Observation of quantum interference in molecular charge transport.

Authors:  Constant M Guédon; Hennie Valkenier; Troels Markussen; Kristian S Thygesen; Jan C Hummelen; Sense Jan van der Molen
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 39.213

2.  Charge transfer: Interfering with interference.

Authors:  Gemma C Solomon
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 24.427

3.  The rate of charge tunneling through self-assembled monolayers is insensitive to many functional group substitutions.

Authors:  Hyo Jae Yoon; Nathan D Shapiro; Kyeng Min Park; Martin M Thuo; Siowling Soh; George M Whitesides
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 4.  Mixed valency in ligand-bridged diruthenium frameworks: divergences and perspectives.

Authors:  Arijit Singha Hazari; Arindam Indra; Goutam Kumar Lahiri
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 4.036

5.  Quantum Chemical Study on the Antioxidation Mechanism of Piceatannol and Isorhapontigenin toward Hydroxyl and Hydroperoxyl Radicals.

Authors:  Yang Lu; AiHua Wang; Peng Shi; Hui Zhang; ZeSheng Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Mechanically Controlled Electron Transfer in a Single-Polypeptide Transistor.

Authors:  Sheh-Yi Sheu; Dah-Yen Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  On the resilience of magic number theory for conductance ratios of aromatic molecules.

Authors:  Lara Ulčakar; Tomaž Rejec; Jure Kokalj; Sara Sangtarash; Hatef Sadeghi; Anton Ramšak; John H Jefferson; Colin J Lambert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Identification of a bridge-specific intramolecular exciton dissociation pathway in donor-π-acceptor alternating conjugated polymers.

Authors:  Zhaoyong Jiao; Tingting Jiang; Zhongpo Zhou; Chaochao Qin; Jinyou Long; Yufang Liu; Yuhai Jiang
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 4.703

9.  Transferrable property relationships between magnetic exchange coupling and molecular conductance.

Authors:  Martin L Kirk; Ranjana Dangi; Diana Habel-Rodriguez; Jing Yang; David A Shultz; Jinyuan Zhang
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 9.825

10.  Charge transfer versus molecular conductance: molecular orbital symmetry turns quantum interference rules upside down.

Authors:  Natalie Gorczak; Nicolas Renaud; Simge Tarkuç; Arjan J Houtepen; Rienk Eelkema; Laurens D A Siebbeles; Ferdinand C Grozema
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 9.825

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.