Literature DB >> 20940621

Benefits of low-frequency attenuation of baha® in single-sided sensorineural deafness.

Flurin Pfiffner1, Martin Kompis, Mark Flynn, Kristian Asnes, Andreas Arnold, Christof Stieger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of low-frequency attenuation of Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids (Bahas) in users with single-sided sensorineural deafness (SSD). The underlying notion is that low-frequency sounds up to approximately 1500 Hz reach the contralateral ear without significant attenuation and that Bahas tend to show more distortion at lower frequencies. Furthermore, to transmit low frequencies, higher moving masses are needed when compared with high frequencies.
DESIGN: A prospective study with 10 adults, experienced Baha Divino users with SSD. Speech understanding in noise was measured without Baha and with Baha, with three different settings of low-frequency attenuation, namely up to 270, 630, and 1500 Hz. Tests were performed in two different spatial arrangements. In one placement, speech was emitted from a loudspeaker on the side of the Baha ear and noise from a loudspeaker in front of the listener (S90N0). In the other placement, the sound sources were switched (S0N90). Participants rated the subjective sound quality of the two most extreme Baha settings using analog visual scales after a short acclimatization time of 15 mins.
RESULTS: In setting S90N0, the use of a Baha improved speech understanding in noise significantly (average improvement 2.8 to 3.1 dB, p = 0.006). These improvements did not vary significantly with the chosen low-frequency attenuation. In setting S0N90, a smaller but detrimental effect of the Baha was found (-0.9 to -1.7 dB, p = 0.006 to 0.03). This detrimental effect was significantly smaller at the highest cutoff frequency of 1500 Hz than at 270 Hz (p = 0.013). At the cutoff frequency of 270 Hz, loudness and reverberation were judged higher than at 1500 Hz. There was no significant difference in brightness, softness, clarity, or fullness.
CONCLUSION: High cutoff levels of up to 1500 Hz for low-frequency signals do not compromise the benefit of Baha in SSD for noise arriving from the front and speech presented on the side of the Baha. If noise is presented from the side of the Baha, the detrimental effect on speech understanding can be reduced by higher cutoff frequencies. If frequencies <1500 Hz do not need to be transmitted, lower moving masses of the Baha are required and smaller devices for patients with SSD may be possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20940621     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181ecd002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  11 in total

1.  Influence of directionality and maximal power output on speech understanding with bone anchored hearing implants in single sided deafness.

Authors:  Silvia Krempaska; Juraj Koval; Christoph Schmid; Flurin Pfiffner; Anja Kurz; Martin Kompis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  [An alternative to percutaneous bone-anchored hearing systems].

Authors:  S Arndt; T Wesarg
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Baha implant as a hearing solution for single-sided deafness after retrosigmoid approach for the vestibular schwannoma: audiological results.

Authors:  Jan Bouček; Jan Vokřál; Libor Černý; Martin Chovanec; Michal Zábrodský; Eduard Zvěřina; Jan Betka; Jiří Skřivan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Baha implant as a hearing solution for single-sided deafness after retrosigmoid approach for the vestibular schwannoma: surgical results.

Authors:  Jan Boucek; Jan Vokral; Libor Cerny; Martin Chovanec; Jiří Skrivan; Eduard Zverina; Jan Betka; Michal Zabrodsky
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Hearing Instruments for Unilateral Severe-to-Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Pádraig Thomas Kitterick; Sandra Nelson Smith; Laura Lucas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Measurements of inter-cochlear level and phase differences of bone-conducted sound.

Authors:  Robert W J Mcleod; John F Culling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Core Rehabilitation Outcome Set for Single Sided Deafness (CROSSSD) study: protocol for an international consensus on outcome measures for single sided deafness interventions using a modified Delphi survey.

Authors:  Roulla Katiri; Deborah A Hall; Nora Buggy; Nicholas Hogan; Adele Horobin; Paul van de Heyning; Jill B Firszt; Iain A Bruce; Pádraig T Kitterick
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 8.  Systematic review of outcome domains and instruments used in designs of clinical trials for interventions that seek to restore bilateral and binaural hearing in adults with unilateral severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss ('single-sided deafness').

Authors:  Roulla Katiri; Deborah A Hall; Catherine F Killan; Sandra Smith; Pattarawadee Prayuenyong; Pádraig T Kitterick
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Mitigation of informational masking in individuals with single-sided deafness by integrated bone conduction hearing aids.

Authors:  Bradford J May; Stephen Bowditch; Yinda Liu; Marc Eisen; John K Niparko
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Comparison of Performance of Transcranial Contralateral Routing of Signal, Pre-Implanted Trimmer Digital and Digital Bone Anchored Hearing Aid in Adults with Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Neelamegarajan Devi; Suma Chatni; Kasetty Jagannathaiah S Ramadevi; Darga Baba Fakruddin
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2015-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.