Literature DB >> 20940414

Prognostic factors for response and overall survival in 282 patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes treated with azacitidine.

Raphael Itzykson1, Sylvain Thépot, Bruno Quesnel, Francois Dreyfus, Odile Beyne-Rauzy, Pascal Turlure, Norbert Vey, Christian Recher, Caroline Dartigeas, Laurence Legros, Jacques Delaunay, Célia Salanoubat, Sorin Visanica, Aspasia Stamatoullas, Francoise Isnard, Anne Marfaing-Koka, Stephane de Botton, Youcef Chelghoum, Anne-Laure Taksin, Isabelle Plantier, Shanti Ame, Simone Boehrer, Claude Gardin, C L Beach, Lionel Adès, Pierre Fenaux.   

Abstract

Prognostic factors for response and survival in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients treated with azacitidine (AZA) remain largely unknown. Two hundred eighty-two consecutive high or intermediate-2 risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients received AZA in a compassionate, patient-named program. Diagnosis was RA/RARS/RCMD in 4%, RAEB-1 in 20%, RAEB-2 in 54%, and RAEB-t (AML with 21%-30% marrow blasts) in 22%. Cytogenetic risk was good in 31%, intermediate in 17%, and poor in 47%. Patients received AZA for a median of 6 cycles (1-52). Previous low-dose cytosine arabinoside treatment (P = .009), bone marrow blasts > 15% (P = .004), and abnormal karyotype (P = .03) independently predicted lower response rates. Complex karyotype predicted shorter responses (P = .0003). Performance status ≥ 2, intermediate- and poor-risk cytogenetics, presence of circulating blasts, and red blood cell transfusion dependency ≥ 4 units/8 weeks (all P < 10(-4)) independently predicted poorer overall survival (OS). A prognostic score based on those factors discriminated 3 risk groups with median OS not reached, 15.0 and 6.1 months, respectively (P < 10(-4)). This prognostic score was validated in an independent set of patients receiving AZA in the AZA-001 trial (P = .003). Achievement of hematological improvement in patients who did not obtain complete or partial remission was associated with improved OS (P < 10(-4)). In conclusion, routine tests can identify subgroups of patients with distinct prognosis with AZA treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20940414     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-06-289280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  109 in total

Review 1.  Predicting response to epigenetic therapy.

Authors:  Marianne B Treppendahl; Lasse S Kristensen; Kirsten Grønbæk
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 2.  Treatment of older patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): the emerging role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo HSCT).

Authors:  Ehab Atallah; Kathryn Bylow; Jesse Troy; Wael Saber
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.952

3.  Personalized medicine in myelodysplastic syndromes: wishful thinking or already clinical reality?

Authors:  Uwe Platzbecker; Pierre Fenaux
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Specific molecular signatures predict decitabine response in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Kristen Meldi; Tingting Qin; Francesca Buchi; Nathalie Droin; Jason Sotzen; Jean-Baptiste Micol; Dorothée Selimoglu-Buet; Erico Masala; Bernardino Allione; Daniela Gioia; Antonella Poloni; Monia Lunghi; Eric Solary; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Valeria Santini; Maria E Figueroa
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  The wolf of hypomethylating agent failure: what comes next?

Authors:  Anne Sophie Kubasch; Uwe Platzbecker
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Factors predicting early mortality after new diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome: A population-based study.

Authors:  Annie M Jacobsen; Jenny N Poynter; Michaela R Richardson; Phuong L Nguyen; Betsy Hirsch; Adina Cioc; Michelle A Roesler; Erica D Warlick
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  Impact of molecular mutations on treatment response to DNMT inhibitors in myelodysplasia and related neoplasms.

Authors:  F Traina; V Visconte; P Elson; A Tabarroki; A M Jankowska; E Hasrouni; Y Sugimoto; H Szpurka; H Makishima; C L O'Keefe; M A Sekeres; A S Advani; M Kalaycio; E A Copelan; Y Saunthararajah; S T Olalla Saad; J P Maciejewski; R V Tiu
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 11.528

8.  Hematologic improvements in a myelodysplastic syndromes with myelofibrosis (MDS-F) patient treated with azacitidine.

Authors:  Daisuke Okamura; Akira Matsuda; Maho Ishikawa; Tomoya Maeda; Ken Tanae; Mika Kohri; Naoki Takahashi; Nobutaka Kawai; Norio Asou; Masami Bessho
Journal:  Leuk Res Rep       Date:  2014-04-16

Review 9.  Azacitidine: A Review in Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukaemia.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Azacitidine with or without Entinostat for the treatment of therapy-related myeloid neoplasm: further results of the E1905 North American Leukemia Intergroup study.

Authors:  Thomas Prebet; Zhuoxin Sun; Rhett P Ketterling; Amer Zeidan; Peter Greenberg; James Herman; Mark Juckett; Mitchell R Smith; Lisa Malick; Elisabeth Paietta; Magdalena Czader; Maria Figueroa; Janice Gabrilove; Harry P Erba; Martin S Tallman; Mark Litzow; Steven D Gore
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 6.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.