Literature DB >> 20940038

A potential in vitro epidermal equivalent assay to determine sensitizer potency.

Guilherme G dos Santos1, Sander W Spiekstra, Shakun C Sampat-Sardjoepersad, Judith Reinders, Rik J Scheper, Susan Gibbs.   

Abstract

Most in vitro assays aim to distinguish sensitizers from non-sensitizers. Few aim to classify sensitizers according to potency. Here, we describe a potential method for classifying sensitizers according to their irritant potency with the aid of in house epidermal equivalents (EE). Sixteen sensitizers were applied topically in a dose response to EE for 24h. The EE-EC(50) value (effective chemical concentration required to reduce cell viability by 50%) and the EE-IL-1α(10)(×) value (chemical concentration which increases IL-1α secretion by 10-fold) were calculated. From 16 sensitizers, EE-EC(50) and/or EE-IL-1α(10×) values were obtained from 12 skin sensitizers. EE-EC(50) and IL-1α(10×) values decreased in proportion to increasing sensitizer potency. The in vitro assay correlated with existing in vivo mouse and human sensitization data (LLNA, HRIPT), and showed low intra- and inter-experimental variability. Additionally DNCB and resorcinol were correctly assessed as extreme and moderate sensitizers using commercial EE (EST1000™ and RHE™). In conclusion, our data supports the view that irritancy may in part be a factor determining sensitizer potency. Since this assay does not distinguish sensitizers from non-sensitizers, its potential application is in a tiered strategy, where Tier 1 identifies sensitizers which may then tested in Tier 2, this assay, which determines sensitizer potency.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20940038     DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2010.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  7 in total

Review 1.  Xenobiotica-metabolizing enzymes in the skin of rat, mouse, pig, guinea pig, man, and in human skin models.

Authors:  F Oesch; E Fabian; Robert Landsiedel
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 5.153

2.  Role of ROS and HMGB1 in contact allergen-induced IL-18 production in human keratinocytes.

Authors:  Valentina Galbiati; Angela Papale; Corrado L Galli; Marina Marinovich; Emanuela Corsini
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 3.  Xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes in the skin of rat, mouse, pig, guinea pig, man, and in human skin models.

Authors:  F Oesch; E Fabian; K Guth; R Landsiedel
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  Progress on Reconstructed Human Skin Models for Allergy Research and Identifying Contact Sensitizers.

Authors:  Charlotte Rodrigues Neves; Susan Gibbs
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

5.  Impedance spectroscopy for the non-destructive evaluation of in vitro epidermal models.

Authors:  F Groeber; L Engelhardt; S Egger; H Werthmann; M Monaghan; H Walles; J Hansmann
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Comet assay in reconstructed 3D human epidermal skin models--investigation of intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility with coded chemicals.

Authors:  Astrid A Reus; Kerstin Reisinger; Thomas R Downs; Gregory J Carr; Andreas Zeller; Raffaella Corvi; Cyrille A M Krul; Stefan Pfuhler
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 7.  GINIplus and LISAplus - Design and selected results of two German birth cohorts about natural course of atopic diseases and their determinants.

Authors:  J Heinrich; I Brüske; C Cramer; U Hoffmann; M Schnappinger; B Schaaf; A von Berg; D Berdel; U Krämer; I Lehmann; O Herbarth; M Borte; A Grübl; C P Bauer; C Beckmann; H Behrendt; J Ring; S Koletzko
Journal:  Allergol Select       Date:  2017-08-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.