Literature DB >> 20939698

Early venous thromboembolic event prophylaxis in traumatic brain injury with low-molecular-weight heparin: risks and benefits.

Roy R Dudley1, Ishtiaque Aziz, André Bonnici, Rajeet S Saluja, Julie Lamoureux, Boaz Kalmovitch, Ash Gursahaney, Tarek Razek, Mohammad Maleki, Judith Marcoux.   

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients are known to be at high risk for venous thromboembolic events (VTEs). The Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines (2007) state that low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin should be used to prevent VTE complications, but suggest that there is an increased risk of expansion of intracranial hemorrhages (ICH) with VTE prophylaxis. In addition, it is unclear which treatment regimen (i.e., medication, dose, and timing) provides the best risk:benefit ratio in TBI patients. We reviewed all moderate-to-severe TBI patients admitted over a 5-year period to: (1) examine the occurrence of VTEs and their timing; (2) examine the symptomatic expansion of ICH while on VTE prophylaxis; and (3) compare the efficacy of two prophylactic agents: enoxaparin and dalteparin. Two-hundred eighty-seven patients were included. VTE prophylaxis was started 48-72 h post-trauma in all individuals who had no confounding coagulopathy, when two consecutive computed tomography (CT) scans revealed hemorrhage stability. VTEs occurred in 7.3% of treated patients, mostly within 2 weeks after trauma. Proximal VTEs occurred in 3.1% of treated patients. No significant difference in VTE rates was seen between enoxaparin (7.0%) and dalteparin (7.5%; p = 0.868). Moreover, the group treated with dalteparin was more severely injured (higher Injury Severity Score [p = 0.002]), had lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores (p = 0.003), and had more inferior vena cava (IVC) filters placed (p = 0.007). The two groups did not show significant differences in the development of VTE when controlled for ISS and IVC filters (p = 0.819). Importantly, only one patient suffered a symptomatic expansion of ICH while on VTE prophylaxis, at 15 days post-trauma. These results suggest that current regimens of VTE prophylaxis used in our TBI population provide a relatively high level of protection against VTEs, and an extremely low risk of expanding ICH. They also suggest that there was no difference in VTE between dalteparin- and enoxaparin-treated patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20939698     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2010.1366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  19 in total

1.  Safety of Chemical DVT Prophylaxis in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury with Invasive Monitoring Devices.

Authors:  Bradley A Dengler; Paolo Mendez-Gomez; Amanda Chavez; Lacey Avila; Joel Michalek; Brian Hernandez; Ramesh Grandhi; Ali Seifi
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 2.  Traumatic brain injury-associated coagulopathy.

Authors:  Jianning Zhang; Rongcai Jiang; Li Liu; Timothy Watkins; Fangyi Zhang; Jing-fei Dong
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Enoxaparin ameliorates post-traumatic brain injury edema and neurologic recovery, reducing cerebral leukocyte endothelial interactions and vessel permeability in vivo.

Authors:  Shengjie Li; Joshua A Marks; Rachel Eisenstadt; Kenichiro Kumasaka; Davoud Samadi; Victoria E Johnson; Daniel N Holena; Steven R Allen; Kevin D Browne; Douglas H Smith; Jose L Pascual
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 4.  Pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after traumatic brain injury: a critical literature review.

Authors:  Herb A Phelan
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Early Chemical Thromboprophylaxis Does not Increase the Risk of Intracranial Hematoma Progression in Patients with Isolated Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Philipp Störmann; William Osinloye; Thomas M Freiman; Volker Seifert; Ingo Marzi; Thomas Lustenberger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  A Systematic Review of the Benefits and Risks of Anticoagulation Following Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Xian Shen; Sarah K Dutcher; Jacqueline Palmer; Xinggang Liu; Zippora Kiptanui; Bilal Khokhar; Mohammad H Al-Jawadi; Yue Zhu; Ilene H Zuckerman
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.710

7.  The Parkland Protocol's modified Berne-Norwood criteria predict two tiers of risk for traumatic brain injury progression.

Authors:  Rachel A Pastorek; Michael W Cripps; Ira H Bernstein; William W Scott; Christopher J Madden; Kim L Rickert; Steven E Wolf; Herb A Phelan
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Dalteparin versus Enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolic events in trauma patients.

Authors:  O T Okoye; R Gelbard; K Inaba; M Esparza; H Belzberg; P Talving; P G Teixeira; L S Chan; D Demetriades
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.693

9.  Does enoxaparin interfere with HMGB1 signaling after TBI? A potential mechanism for reduced cerebral edema and neurologic recovery.

Authors:  Shengjie Li; Rachel Eisenstadt; Kenichiro Kumasaka; Victoria E Johnson; Joshua Marks; Katsuhiro Nagata; Kevin D Browne; Douglas H Smith; Jose L Pascual
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 10.  International multidisciplinary consensus conference on multimodality monitoring: ICU processes of care.

Authors:  Molly M McNett; David A Horowitz
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.210

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.