Literature DB >> 20937977

Lasofoxifene and cardiovascular events in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: Five-year results from the Postmenopausal Evaluation and Risk Reduction with Lasofoxifene (PEARL) trial.

Kristine Ensrud1, Andrea LaCroix, John R Thompson, David D Thompson, Richard Eastell, David M Reid, Slobodan Vukicevic, Jane Cauley, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, Roisin Armstrong, Francine Welty, Steven Cummings.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the Postmenopausal Evaluation and Risk Reduction With Lasofoxifene (PEARL) trial, women assigned to lasofoxifene 0.5 mg/d had a lower risk of major coronary heart disease (CHD) events and stroke, whereas women assigned to lasofoxifene 0.25 mg/d had a lower risk of stroke. Both doses of lasofoxifene increased the risk of venous thromboembolic events. In this report, we provide comprehensive cardiovascular end-point data, including component events comprising the composite end point of major CHD events, and evaluate whether the effect of lasofoxifene 0.5 mg/d is consistent across different categories of CHD risk. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In this study, 8556 women 59 to 80 years of age with osteoporosis received lasofoxifene 0.25 mg/d, lasofoxifene 0.5 mg/d, or placebo for 5 years. Cardiovascular events, including major CHD events, were prespecified secondary end points. Compared with placebo, lasofoxifene 0.5 mg/d reduced the risk of major CHD events 32% (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.50 to 0.93), including the risk of coronary revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.56, 95% confidence interval, 0.32 to 0.98). Reductions in risk of hospitalization for unstable angina (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.29 to 1.04) and diagnosis of new ischemic heart disease (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.26 to 1.04) nearly reached significance (P=0.06 for both comparisons). Although both hazard ratios were <1.0, no significant effect of lasofoxifene at 0.5 mg/d was demonstrated for coronary death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. The reduction in CHD events with lasofoxifene 0.25 mg/d was not significant (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.56 to 1.03; P=0.08). The effectiveness of lasofoxifene 0.5 mg/d in reducing CHD events was similar across strata of major cardiovascular risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, lasofoxifene 0.5 mg/d for 5 years reduced the risk of CHD events, regardless of the presence or absence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The significant reduction in risk of CHD events with lasofoxifene 0.5 mg/d was due primarily to lower risks of coronary revascularization procedures, hospitalization for unstable angina, and diagnosis of new ischemic heart disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00141323.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20937977     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.924571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  10 in total

1.  Selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) lasofoxifene forms reactive quinones similar to estradiol.

Authors:  Bradley T Michalsen; Teshome B Gherezghiher; Jaewoo Choi; R Esala P Chandrasena; Zhihui Qin; Gregory R J Thatcher; Judy L Bolton
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  Role of GPER in estrogen-dependent nitric oxide formation and vasodilation.

Authors:  Natalie C Fredette; Matthias R Meyer; Eric R Prossnitz
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.292

Review 3.  The G protein-coupled estrogen receptor GPER/GPR30 as a regulator of cardiovascular function.

Authors:  Matthias R Meyer; Eric R Prossnitz; Matthias Barton
Journal:  Vascul Pharmacol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 5.773

4.  European Stroke Organisation guidelines on stroke in women: Management of menopause, pregnancy and postpartum.

Authors:  Christine Kremer; Zuzana Gdovinova; Yannick Bejot; Mirjam R Heldner; Susanna Zuurbier; Silke Walter; Avtar Lal; Corina Epple; Svetlana Lorenzano; Marie-Luise Mono; Theodore Karapanayiotides; Kailash Krishnan; Dejana Jovanovic; Jesse Dawson; Valeria Caso
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2022-03-29

5.  GPER/GPR30 and Regulation of Vascular Tone and Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Matthias R Meyer; Eric R Prossnitz; Matthias Barton
Journal:  Immunol Endocr Metab Agents Med Chem       Date:  2011

6.  Extraskeletal benefits and risks of calcium, vitamin D and anti-osteoporosis medications.

Authors:  J-J Body; P Bergmann; S Boonen; J-P Devogelaer; E Gielen; S Goemaere; J-M Kaufman; S Rozenberg; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Assessment of Cardiovascular Safety of Anti-Osteoporosis Drugs.

Authors:  N R Fuggle; C Cooper; N C Harvey; N Al-Daghri; M-L Brandi; O Bruyere; A Cano; E M Dennison; A Diez-Perez; J-M Kaufman; S Palacios; D Prieto-Alhambra; S Rozenberg; T Thomas; F Tremollieres; R Rizzoli; J A Kanis; J Y Reginster
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators: A Potential Option For Non-Binary Gender-Affirming Hormonal Care?

Authors:  Jane Y Xu; Michele A O'Connell; Lauren Notini; Ada S Cheung; Sav Zwickl; Ken C Pang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 9.  The evolution of selective estrogen receptor modulators in osteoporosis therapy.

Authors:  P Hadji
Journal:  Climacteric       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.005

10.  Selective estrogen receptor modulator lasofoxifene suppresses spondyloarthritis manifestation and affects characteristics of gut microbiota in zymosan-induced SKG mice.

Authors:  Hyemin Jeong; In Young Kim; Eun-Kyung Bae; Chan Hong Jeon; Kwang-Sung Ahn; Hoon-Suk Cha
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.