OBJECTIVE: To determine the specific type of amyloid from nerve biopsies using laser microdissection (LMD) and mass spectrometric (MS)-based proteomic analysis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Twenty-one nerve biopsy specimens (17 sural, 3 sciatic, and 1 root amyloidoma) infiltrated by amyloid were studied. Immunohistochemical subtyping was unable to determine the specific amyloid type for these 21 cases, but the clinical diagnosis was made based on additional testing. Clinical diagnosis was made through evaluation of serum monoclonal proteins, biopsy of bone marrow for acquired monoclonal immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis, and kindred evaluations with DNA sequencing of transthyretin (TTR) and gelsolin (GSN) genes. Our study included 8 cases of acquired monoclonal immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis, 11 cases of transthyretin amyloidosis (3 with the Val30Met mutation, 2 with the Val32Ala mutation, 2 with the Thr60Ala mutation, 1 with the Ala109Ser mutation, 1 with the Phe64Leu mutation, 1 with the Ala97Ser mutation, and 1 not sequenced), and 2 cases of gelsolin amyloidosis (1 with the Asp187Asn mutation and 1 not sequenced). One patient with transthyretin amyloidosis and 1 patient with gelsolin amyloidosis with no specific mutation identified were diagnosed based on genetic confirmation in their first-degree relative. Congophilic proteins in the tissues of these 21 cases underwent LMD, were digested into tryptic peptides, and were analyzed using liquid chromatography electrospray tandem MS. Identified proteins were reviewed using bioinformatics tools with interpreters blinded to clinical information. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Specific amyloid type was ascertained by LMD tandem MS and compared with clinical diagnosis. RESULTS: Specific types of amyloid were accurately detected by LMD/MS in all cases (8 cases of acquired monoclonal immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis, 2 cases of gelsolin amyloidosis, and 11 cases of transthyretin amyloidosis). Incidental serum monoclonal proteins did not interfere with detection of transthyretin amyloidosis in 2 patients. Additionally, specific TTR mutations were identified in 10 cases by LMD/MS. Serum amyloid P-component and apolipoprotein E proteins were commonly found among all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Proteomic analysis of nerve tissue using LMD/MS distinguishes specific types of amyloid independent of clinical information. This new proteomic approach will enhance both diagnostic and research efforts in amyloidosis and other neurologic diseases.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the specific type of amyloid from nerve biopsies using laser microdissection (LMD) and mass spectrometric (MS)-based proteomic analysis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Twenty-one nerve biopsy specimens (17 sural, 3 sciatic, and 1 root amyloidoma) infiltrated by amyloid were studied. Immunohistochemical subtyping was unable to determine the specific amyloid type for these 21 cases, but the clinical diagnosis was made based on additional testing. Clinical diagnosis was made through evaluation of serum monoclonal proteins, biopsy of bone marrow for acquired monoclonal immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis, and kindred evaluations with DNA sequencing of transthyretin (TTR) and gelsolin (GSN) genes. Our study included 8 cases of acquired monoclonal immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis, 11 cases of transthyretinamyloidosis (3 with the Val30Met mutation, 2 with the Val32Ala mutation, 2 with the Thr60Ala mutation, 1 with the Ala109Ser mutation, 1 with the Phe64Leu mutation, 1 with the Ala97Ser mutation, and 1 not sequenced), and 2 cases of gelsolinamyloidosis (1 with the Asp187Asn mutation and 1 not sequenced). One patient with transthyretinamyloidosis and 1 patient with gelsolinamyloidosis with no specific mutation identified were diagnosed based on genetic confirmation in their first-degree relative. Congophilic proteins in the tissues of these 21 cases underwent LMD, were digested into tryptic peptides, and were analyzed using liquid chromatography electrospray tandem MS. Identified proteins were reviewed using bioinformatics tools with interpreters blinded to clinical information. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Specific amyloid type was ascertained by LMD tandem MS and compared with clinical diagnosis. RESULTS: Specific types of amyloid were accurately detected by LMD/MS in all cases (8 cases of acquired monoclonal immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis, 2 cases of gelsolinamyloidosis, and 11 cases of transthyretinamyloidosis). Incidental serum monoclonal proteins did not interfere with detection of transthyretinamyloidosis in 2 patients. Additionally, specific TTR mutations were identified in 10 cases by LMD/MS. Serum amyloid P-component and apolipoprotein E proteins were commonly found among all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Proteomic analysis of nerve tissue using LMD/MS distinguishes specific types of amyloid independent of clinical information. This new proteomic approach will enhance both diagnostic and research efforts in amyloidosis and other neurologic diseases.
Authors: A M Saunders; K Schmader; J C Breitner; M D Benson; W T Brown; L Goldfarb; D Goldgaber; M G Manwaring; M H Szymanski; N McCown Journal: Lancet Date: 1993-09-18 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: M B Pepys; T W Rademacher; S Amatayakul-Chantler; P Williams; G E Noble; W L Hutchinson; P N Hawkins; S R Nelson; J R Gallimore; J Herbert Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1994-06-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: G Holmgren; B G Ericzon; C G Groth; L Steen; O Suhr; O Andersen; B G Wallin; A Seymour; S Richardson; P N Hawkins Journal: Lancet Date: 1993-05-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Helen J Lachmann; David R Booth; Susanne E Booth; Alison Bybee; Janet A Gilbertson; Julian D Gillmore; Mark B Pepys; Philip N Hawkins Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-06-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Juan J Figueroa; E Peter Bosch; P James B Dyck; Wolfgang Singer; Julie A Vrana; Jason D Theis; Ahmet Dogan; Christopher J Klein Journal: J Peripher Nerv Syst Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Jeffrey C Hanson; Michael A Tangrea; Skye Kim; Michael D Armani; Thomas J Pohida; Robert F Bonner; Jaime Rodriguez-Canales; Michael R Emmert-Buck Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2011-03-18 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Carlo O Martins; Cecilia Lezcano; San S Yi; Heather J Landau; Jessica R Chapman; Ahmet Dogan Journal: Haematologica Date: 2018-09-27 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Adam J Loavenbruck; Vinay Chaudhry; Steven R Zeldenrust; Robert J Spinner; Jason D Theis; Christopher J Klein Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: Julie A Vrana; Jason D Theis; Surendra Dasari; Oana M Mereuta; Angela Dispenzieri; Steven R Zeldenrust; Morie A Gertz; Paul J Kurtin; Karen L Grogg; Ahmet Dogan Journal: Haematologica Date: 2014-04-18 Impact factor: 9.941