Literature DB >> 20937893

Bayesian model of dynamic image stabilization in the visual system.

Yoram Burak1, Uri Rokni, Markus Meister, Haim Sompolinsky.   

Abstract

Humans can resolve the fine details of visual stimuli although the image projected on the retina is constantly drifting relative to the photoreceptor array. Here we demonstrate that the brain must take this drift into account when performing high acuity visual tasks. Further, we propose a decoding strategy for interpreting the spikes emitted by the retina, which takes into account the ambiguity caused by retinal noise and the unknown trajectory of the projected image on the retina. A main difficulty, addressed in our proposal, is the exponentially large number of possible stimuli, which renders the ideal Bayesian solution to the problem computationally intractable. In contrast, the strategy that we propose suggests a realistic implementation in the visual cortex. The implementation involves two populations of cells, one that tracks the position of the image and another that represents a stabilized estimate of the image itself. Spikes from the retina are dynamically routed to the two populations and are interpreted in a probabilistic manner. We consider the architecture of neural circuitry that could implement this strategy and its performance under measured statistics of human fixational eye motion. A salient prediction is that in high acuity tasks, fixed features within the visual scene are beneficial because they provide information about the drifting position of the image. Therefore, complete elimination of peripheral features in the visual scene should degrade performance on high acuity tasks involving very small stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20937893      PMCID: PMC2984143          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1006076107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  38 in total

1.  Auditory spatial receptive fields created by multiplication.

Authors:  J L Peña; M Konishi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Gain modulation: a major computational principle of the central nervous system.

Authors:  E Salinas; P Thier
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Efficient computation and cue integration with noisy population codes.

Authors:  S Deneve; P E Latham; A Pouget
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Functional asymmetries in ON and OFF ganglion cells of primate retina.

Authors:  E J Chichilnisky; Rachel S Kalmar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Visual jitter: evidence for visual-motion-based compensation of retinal slip due to small eye movements.

Authors:  I Murakami; P Cavanagh
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Multiplicative gain changes are induced by excitation or inhibition alone.

Authors:  Brendan K Murphy; Kenneth D Miller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-11-05       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Gain modulation from background synaptic input.

Authors:  Frances S Chance; L F Abbott; Alex D Reyes
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Segregation of object and background motion in the retina.

Authors:  Bence P Olveczky; Stephen A Baccus; Markus Meister
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-11       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Eye position compensation improves estimates of response magnitude and receptive field geometry in alert monkeys.

Authors:  Yamei Tang; Alan Saul; Moshe Gur; Stephanie Goei; Elsie Wong; Bilgin Ersoy; D Max Snodderly
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  M N Shadlen; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  25 in total

1.  Characterizing responses of translation-invariant neurons to natural stimuli: maximally informative invariant dimensions.

Authors:  Michael Eickenberg; Ryan J Rowekamp; Minjoon Kouh; Tatyana O Sharpee
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  Does the brain de-jitter retinal images?

Authors:  Bruno A Olshausen; Charles H Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Precision of sustained fixation in trained and untrained observers.

Authors:  Claudia Cherici; Xutao Kuang; Martina Poletti; Michele Rucci
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Head-Eye Coordination at a Microscopic Scale.

Authors:  Martina Poletti; Murat Aytekin; Michele Rucci
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Psychophysical and physiological evidence contradicts a model of dynamic image stabilization.

Authors:  Christian Wehrhahn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  An integrated model of fixational eye movements and microsaccades.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Konstantin Mergenthaler; Petra Sinn; Arkady Pikovsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The effects of fixational tremor on the retinal image.

Authors:  Norick R Bowers; Alexandra E Boehm; Austin Roorda
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 8.  Temporal Coding of Visual Space.

Authors:  Michele Rucci; Ehud Ahissar; David Burr
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 9.  Control and Functions of Fixational Eye Movements.

Authors:  Michele Rucci; Martina Poletti
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 6.422

10.  Suboptimal eye movements for seeing fine details.

Authors:  Mehmet N Agaoglu; Christy K Sheehy; Pavan Tiruveedhula; Austin Roorda; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.