BACKGROUND: Structural factors contributing to the development of postinfarction ventricular tachycardia (VT) are unclear. The purpose of this study was to analyze infarct architecture and electrogram characteristics in patients with and without inducible VT and to identify correlates of postinfarction VT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-four postinfarction patients (median age, 64 [53, 70] years) were referred for radiofrequency catheter ablation of VT (n = 12) or frequent symptomatic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) (n = 12). Delayed-enhanced (DE) MRI was obtained before ablation. Electroanatomical mapping was performed and scar area and electrogram characteristics of the scar tissue compared in patients with and without inducible VT. The median ejection fraction in patients with and without inducible VT was 27% (22%, 43%) and 43% (40%, 47%), respectively (P = 0.085). Subendocardial infarct area determined by DE-MRI was larger in patients with inducible VT (43 [38, 62] cm(2)) than in those with noninducible VT (8 [4, 11] cm(2); P = 0.002), and unipolar and bipolar voltages on electroanatomical maps were significantly lower in patients with inducible VT (both P<0.05). An infarct volume of >14% identified 11 of 12 patients with inducible VT (area under the curve, 0.94; P = 0.007). On electroanatomical mapping, distinct sites with isolated potentials (IPs) were more prevalent in patients with inducible VT than in those without (13.2% versus 1.1% of points within scar; P < 0.001). The number of inducible VTs correlated with the number of distinct sites with IPs (R = 0.87; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Scar tissue in postinfarction patients with inducible VT shows quantitative and qualitative differences from scars in patients without inducible VT. Scar size and IPs are correlated with VT inducibility.
BACKGROUND: Structural factors contributing to the development of postinfarction ventricular tachycardia (VT) are unclear. The purpose of this study was to analyze infarct architecture and electrogram characteristics in patients with and without inducible VT and to identify correlates of postinfarction VT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-four postinfarction patients (median age, 64 [53, 70] years) were referred for radiofrequency catheter ablation of VT (n = 12) or frequent symptomatic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) (n = 12). Delayed-enhanced (DE) MRI was obtained before ablation. Electroanatomical mapping was performed and scar area and electrogram characteristics of the scar tissue compared in patients with and without inducible VT. The median ejection fraction in patients with and without inducible VT was 27% (22%, 43%) and 43% (40%, 47%), respectively (P = 0.085). Subendocardial infarct area determined by DE-MRI was larger in patients with inducible VT (43 [38, 62] cm(2)) than in those with noninducible VT (8 [4, 11] cm(2); P = 0.002), and unipolar and bipolar voltages on electroanatomical maps were significantly lower in patients with inducible VT (both P<0.05). An infarct volume of >14% identified 11 of 12 patients with inducible VT (area under the curve, 0.94; P = 0.007). On electroanatomical mapping, distinct sites with isolated potentials (IPs) were more prevalent in patients with inducible VT than in those without (13.2% versus 1.1% of points within scar; P < 0.001). The number of inducible VTs correlated with the number of distinct sites with IPs (R = 0.87; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Scar tissue in postinfarction patients with inducible VT shows quantitative and qualitative differences from scars in patients without inducible VT. Scar size and IPs are correlated with VT inducibility.
Authors: O P Simonetti; R J Kim; D S Fieno; H B Hillenbrand; E Wu; J M Bundy; J P Finn; R M Judd Journal: Radiology Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Andrew T Yan; Adolphe J Shayne; Kenneth A Brown; Sandeep N Gupta; Carmen W Chan; Tuan M Luu; Marcelo F Di Carli; H Glenn Reynolds; William G Stevenson; Raymond Y Kwong Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-06-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Frank Bogun; Subramaniam Krishnan; Mukarram Siddiqui; Eric Good; Joseph E Marine; Claudio Schuger; Hakan Oral; Aman Chugh; Frank Pelosi; Fred Morady Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-08-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: David Bello; David S Fieno; Raymond J Kim; F Scott Pereles; Rod Passman; Gina Song; Alan H Kadish; Jeffrey J Goldberger Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-04-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: André Schmidt; Clerio F Azevedo; Alan Cheng; Sandeep N Gupta; David A Bluemke; Thomas K Foo; Gary Gerstenblith; Robert G Weiss; Eduardo Marbán; Gordon F Tomaselli; João A C Lima; Katherine C Wu Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-03-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Benoit Desjardins; Thomas Crawford; Eric Good; Hakan Oral; Aman Chugh; Frank Pelosi; Fred Morady; Frank Bogun Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2009-02-14 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Haris M Haqqani; Jonathan M Kalman; Kurt C Roberts-Thomson; Richard N Balasubramaniam; Raphael Rosso; Richard L Snowdon; Paul B Sparks; Jitendra K Vohra; Joseph B Morton Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-07-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: David J Wilber; Wojciech Zareba; W Jackson Hall; Mary W Brown; Albert C Lin; Mark L Andrews; Martin Burke; Arthur J Moss Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-03-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Hussein Rayatzadeh; Alex Tan; Raymond H Chan; Shalin J Patel; Thomas H Hauser; Long Ngo; Jaime L Shaw; Susie N Hong; Peter Zimetbaum; Alfred E Buxton; Mark E Josephson; Warren J Manning; Reza Nezafat Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2013-04-10 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Iffath A Ghouri; Allen Kelly; Simona Salerno; Karin Garten; Tomas Stølen; Ole-Johan Kemi; Godfrey L Smith Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-10-17 Impact factor: 4.566