Literature DB >> 20937722

Determinants of postinfarction ventricular tachycardia.

Thomas Crawford1, Jennifer Cowger, Benoit Desjardins, Hyungjin Myra Kim, Eric Good, Krit Jongnarangsin, Hakan Oral, Aman Chugh, Frank Pelosi, Fred Morady, Frank Bogun.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Structural factors contributing to the development of postinfarction ventricular tachycardia (VT) are unclear. The purpose of this study was to analyze infarct architecture and electrogram characteristics in patients with and without inducible VT and to identify correlates of postinfarction VT. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Twenty-four postinfarction patients (median age, 64 [53, 70] years) were referred for radiofrequency catheter ablation of VT (n = 12) or frequent symptomatic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) (n = 12). Delayed-enhanced (DE) MRI was obtained before ablation. Electroanatomical mapping was performed and scar area and electrogram characteristics of the scar tissue compared in patients with and without inducible VT. The median ejection fraction in patients with and without inducible VT was 27% (22%, 43%) and 43% (40%, 47%), respectively (P = 0.085). Subendocardial infarct area determined by DE-MRI was larger in patients with inducible VT (43 [38, 62] cm(2)) than in those with noninducible VT (8 [4, 11] cm(2); P = 0.002), and unipolar and bipolar voltages on electroanatomical maps were significantly lower in patients with inducible VT (both P<0.05). An infarct volume of >14% identified 11 of 12 patients with inducible VT (area under the curve, 0.94; P = 0.007). On electroanatomical mapping, distinct sites with isolated potentials (IPs) were more prevalent in patients with inducible VT than in those without (13.2% versus 1.1% of points within scar; P < 0.001). The number of inducible VTs correlated with the number of distinct sites with IPs (R = 0.87; P<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Scar tissue in postinfarction patients with inducible VT shows quantitative and qualitative differences from scars in patients without inducible VT. Scar size and IPs are correlated with VT inducibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20937722      PMCID: PMC3091263          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.110.945295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1941-3084


  20 in total

1.  An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  O P Simonetti; R J Kim; D S Fieno; H B Hillenbrand; E Wu; J M Bundy; J P Finn; R M Judd
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Characterization of the peri-infarct zone by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is a powerful predictor of post-myocardial infarction mortality.

Authors:  Andrew T Yan; Adolphe J Shayne; Kenneth A Brown; Sandeep N Gupta; Carmen W Chan; Tuan M Luu; Marcelo F Di Carli; H Glenn Reynolds; William G Stevenson; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-06-26       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Electrogram characteristics in postinfarction ventricular tachycardia: effect of infarct age.

Authors:  Frank Bogun; Subramaniam Krishnan; Mukarram Siddiqui; Eric Good; Joseph E Marine; Claudio Schuger; Hakan Oral; Aman Chugh; Frank Pelosi; Fred Morady
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Infarct morphology identifies patients with substrate for sustained ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  David Bello; David S Fieno; Raymond J Kim; F Scott Pereles; Rod Passman; Gina Song; Alan H Kadish; Jeffrey J Goldberger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Infarct tissue heterogeneity by magnetic resonance imaging identifies enhanced cardiac arrhythmia susceptibility in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  André Schmidt; Clerio F Azevedo; Alan Cheng; Sandeep N Gupta; David A Bluemke; Thomas K Foo; Gary Gerstenblith; Robert G Weiss; Eduardo Marbán; Gordon F Tomaselli; João A C Lima; Katherine C Wu
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Relation between infarct size and ventricular arrhythmia.

Authors:  R Roberts; A Husain; H D Ambos; G C Oliver; J R Cox; B E Sobel
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1975-11

7.  Infarct architecture and characteristics on delayed enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and electroanatomic mapping in patients with postinfarction ventricular arrhythmia.

Authors:  Benoit Desjardins; Thomas Crawford; Eric Good; Hakan Oral; Aman Chugh; Frank Pelosi; Fred Morady; Frank Bogun
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 6.343

8.  Fundamental differences in electrophysiologic and electroanatomic substrate between ischemic cardiomyopathy patients with and without clinical ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  Haris M Haqqani; Jonathan M Kalman; Kurt C Roberts-Thomson; Richard N Balasubramaniam; Raphael Rosso; Richard L Snowdon; Paul B Sparks; Jitendra K Vohra; Joseph B Morton
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Time dependence of mortality risk and defibrillator benefit after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  David J Wilber; Wojciech Zareba; W Jackson Hall; Mary W Brown; Albert C Lin; Mark L Andrews; Martin Burke; Arthur J Moss
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Relationships among ventricular arrhythmias, coronary artery disease, and angiographic and electrocardiographic indicators of myocardial fibrosis.

Authors:  R M Califf; J M Burks; V S Behar; J R Margolis; G S Wagner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  6 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance estimates of the extent and heterogeneity of scar tissue in ICD patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy predict ventricular arrhythmia.

Authors:  Tawfiq Zeidan-Shwiri; Yuesong Yang; Ilan Lashevsky; Ehud Kadmon; Darren Kagal; Alexander Dick; Avishag Laish Farkash; Gideon Paul; Donsheng Gao; Mohammed Shurrab; David Newman; Graham Wright; Eugene Crystal
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  Integration of CMR scar imaging and electroanatomic mapping: the future of VT ablation?

Authors:  Kenneth C Bilchick
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-02

3.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy-induced proarrhythmia: understanding preferential conduction within myocardial scars.

Authors:  Jason S Bradfield; Kalyanam Shivkumar
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-12

4.  Fast rate (≥ 250 beats/min) right ventricular burst stimulation is useful for ventricular tachycardia induction in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Ling-Min Wu; Jing-Ru Bao; Yan Yao; Bing-Bo Hou; Li-Hui Zheng; Shu Zhang
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.327

5.  Scar heterogeneity on cardiovascular magnetic resonance as a predictor of appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.

Authors:  Hussein Rayatzadeh; Alex Tan; Raymond H Chan; Shalin J Patel; Thomas H Hauser; Long Ngo; Jaime L Shaw; Susie N Hong; Peter Zimetbaum; Alfred E Buxton; Mark E Josephson; Warren J Manning; Reza Nezafat
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Characterization of Electrical Activity in Post-myocardial Infarction Scar Tissue in Rat Hearts Using Multiphoton Microscopy.

Authors:  Iffath A Ghouri; Allen Kelly; Simona Salerno; Karin Garten; Tomas Stølen; Ole-Johan Kemi; Godfrey L Smith
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.