| Literature DB >> 20937145 |
Nan Ge1, Huan-Xin Lin, Xiang-Sheng Xiao, Ling Guo, Hui-Min Xu, Xin Wang, Ting Jin, Xiu-Yu Cai, Yi Liang, Wei-Han Hu, Tiebang Kang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oct4 and Sox2 are two major transcription factors related to the stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. The aim of this study was to examine the association between Oct4 and Sox2 expression levels with both the clinicopathological characteristics and prognoses of patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20937145 PMCID: PMC2958910 DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-8-94
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
The expressions of Oct4 and Sox2 and their relationships with clinicopathological characteristics.
| Features | No. patients | OCT4 | SOX2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High | Low | High | Low | ||||
| Gender | |||||||
| Female | 1 | 0 | 1 | - | 1 | 0 | - |
| Male | 84 | 14 | 70 | 66 | 18 | ||
| Age (years)b | |||||||
| <60 | 41 | 7 | 34 | 0.885 | 35 | 6 | 0.154 |
| ≥60 | 44 | 7 | 37 | 32 | 12 | ||
| Histological grade | |||||||
| Well | 34 | 5 | 29 | 0.572 | 28 | 6 | |
| Moderately | 39 | 8 | 31 | 33 | 6 | ||
| Poorly | 12 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 6 | ||
| SCCAc (ng/ml) | |||||||
| ≤ 1 | 43 | 8 | 35 | 0.348 | 34 | 9 | 0.794 |
| > 1 | 21 | 2 | 19 | 16 | 5 | ||
| TSGFd (ng/ml) | |||||||
| ≤ 70 | 33 | 4 | 29 | 0.298 | 24 | 9 | 0.230 |
| > 70 | 22 | 5 | 17 | 19 | 3 | ||
| T Stage | |||||||
| 1~2 | 21 | 3 | 18 | 0.756 | 16 | 5 | 0.734 |
| 3~4 | 64 | 11 | 53 | 51 | 13 | ||
| Cervical lymph node metastasis | |||||||
| Positive | 19 | 7 | 12 | 16 | 3 | 0.514 | |
| Negative | 66 | 7 | 59 | 51 | 15 | ||
| TNM Stage | |||||||
| I~II | 7 | 1 | 6 | 0.871 | 4 | 3 | 0.143 |
| III~IV | 78 | 13 | 65 | 63 | 15 | ||
| Treatment Typee | |||||||
| L + N | 7 | 5 | 2 | - | 5 | 2 | - |
| L + N+ R | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | ||
| L + N + C | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | ||
| L + N + R + C | 6 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | ||
| N + R | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||
| N + R + C | 6 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 | ||
| R | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||
| R + C | 21 | 2 | 19 | 20 | 1 | ||
| C | 20 | 1 | 19 | 17 | 3 | ||
| No treatment or tracheotomy | 12 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 2 | ||
a Chi-square test
b Patients were divided according to the median values of age.
c SCCA, Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen
d TSGF, Tumor Supplied Group of Factor
e L = Laryngectomy, N = Neck dissection, R = Radiotherapy, C = Chemotherapy
The relationships between clinicopathological variables and immunohistochemical features with the overall survival.
| Variables | OS (%) | χ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 y | 3 y | 5 y | ||||
| Ageb (y) | ||||||
| <60 | 41 | 65.9 | 19.5 | 17.1 | 0.555 | 0.348 |
| ≥60 | 44 | 63.6 | 25.0 | 20.5 | ||
| Histological grade | ||||||
| Well | 34 | 66.7 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 0.996 | 0.008 |
| Moderately | 39 | 67.6 | 20.6 | 17.6 | ||
| Poorly | 12 | 61.5 | 23.1 | 17.9 | ||
| SCCAc (ng/ml) | ||||||
| ≤ 1 | 43 | 69.8 | 18.6 | 16.2 | 0.200 | 1.639 |
| > 1 | 21 | 71.4 | 19.0 | 14.3 | ||
| TSGFd (ng/ml) | ||||||
| ≤ 70 | 33 | 69.7 | 15.2 | 12.1 | 0.244 | 1.356 |
| > 70 | 22 | 68.2 | 22.7 | 18.2 | ||
| T Stage | ||||||
| 1~2 | 21 | 90.5 | 23.8 | 14.3 | 0.303 | 1.061 |
| 3~4 | 64 | 56.3 | 25.0 | 20.3 | ||
| Cervical lymph | ||||||
| positive | 66 | 63.6 | 18.2 | 15.2 | 0.103 | 2.662 |
| negative | 19 | 68.4 | 36.8 | 31.6 | ||
| TNM Stage | ||||||
| I~II | 7 | 100 | 28.5 | 28.5 | 0.678 | 0.173 |
| III~IV | 78 | 61.5 | 21.8 | 17.9 | ||
| Oct4e | ||||||
| High Expression | 14 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 57.1 | 15.661 | |
| Low Expression | 71 | 60.6 | 12.7 | 11.3 | ||
| Sox2e | ||||||
| High Expression | 67 | 59.7 | 23.9 | 19.4 | 0.683 | 0.166 |
| Low Expression | 18 | 83.3 | 16.7 | 16.7 | ||
| Oct4 & Sox2 | 17.991 | |||||
| Both high | 13 | 88.2 | 76.9 | 61.5 | ||
| Either high | 55 | 54.5 | 10.9 | 9.1 | ||
| Both low | 17 | 82.4 | 17.6 | 17.6 | ||
a Log-rank test
b Patients were divided according to the median values of age.
c SCCA, Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen
d TSGF, Tumor Supplied Group of Factor
e Two-sided log rank test with an overall sample size of 85 subjects (of which 71 are in group
1 and 14 are in group 2) achieves 84% power at a 0.0500 significance level to detect a difference of 0.5870 between 0.1270 and 0.7140--the proportions surviving in groups 1 and 2,respectively. This corresponds to a hazard ratio of 0.1632. These results are based on the assumption that the hazard rates are proportional.
Figure 1Expression of Oct4 and Sox2. Immunohistochemical staining for Oct4 and Sox2 expression in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Brown grains represent a positive signal (3, 3-diaminobenzidine staining). The positive expression site of Oct4 and Sox2 was mainly localized in the nucleus of tumor cells. (A) High Oct4 expression in tumor cells, (B) low Oct4 expression in tumor cells, (C) high Sox2 expression in tumor cells, and (D) low Sox2 expression in tumor cells.
The relationships between clinicopathological variables and immunohistochemical features with the disease-free survival and the loco-regional control.
| Ageb | 0.340 | 0.911 | 0.398 | 0.713 |
| Histological grade | 0.852 | 0.320 | 0.782 | 0.492 |
| SCCAc | 0.265 | 1.243 | 0.165 | 1.932 |
| TSGFd | 0.352 | 0.868 | 0.370 | 0.804 |
| T Stage | 0.437 | 0.605 | 0.567 | 0.328 |
| Cervical lymph node metastasis | 0.050 | 3.832 | 0.106 | 2.610 |
| TNM Stage | 0.877 | 0.024 | 0.934 | 0.007 |
| Oct4 expression | 22.275 | 20.405 | ||
| Sox2 expression | 0.680 | 0.170 | 0.383 | 0.761 |
| Oct4 & Sox2 expression | 26.331 | 22.101 | ||
a Log-rank test
b Patients were divided according to the median values of age.
c SCCA, Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen
d TSGF, Tumor Supplied Group of Factor
Figure 2The Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival rates according to (A) Oct4 expression status, (B) Sox2 expression status, (C) combined expression status of Oct4/Sox2 and loco-regional control rates according to (D) Oct4 expression status in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Statistical differences were calculated through log-rank comparisons.
Multivariate analysis
| Oct4 expression | 0.296 | 0.129-0.679 | 0.183 | 0.040-0.475 | ||
| Sox2 expression | 0.855 | 0.477-1.532 | 0.599 | 1.239 | 0.681-2.254 | 0.485 |
a CI, Confidence interval
b Cox regression model