Literature DB >> 20936893

Contemporary mental health program implementation and evaluation.

Timothy Wand1, Kathryn White, Joanna Patching.   

Abstract

Evaluation is a burgeoning field of health care program research. Experimental designs and meta-analyses have traditionally been considered the most suitable means of assessing program effectiveness. Qualitative methods also have been widely adopted. Mixed-methods designs have now emerged as a promising alternative. This paper highlights the key features of contemporary mental health program implementation and evaluation. Realistic Evaluation is identified as a relatively new methodology that is more concerned with a deeper process-oriented inquiry and appreciates that any program must be understood within the given context. Two projects applying Realistic Evaluation are cited to illustrate the value of this methodology to mental health program research.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20936893     DOI: 10.3109/01612840.2010.503008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Issues Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 0161-2840            Impact factor:   1.835


  1 in total

1.  Developing a good practice model to evaluate the effectiveness of comprehensive primary health care in local communities.

Authors:  Angela Lawless; Toby Freeman; Michael Bentley; Fran Baum; Gwyn Jolley
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.497

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.