| Literature DB >> 20936744 |
Horacio Riojas-Rodríguez1, Rodolfo Solís-Vivanco, Astrid Schilmann, Sergio Montes, Sandra Rodríguez, Camilo Ríos, Yaneth Rodríguez-Agudelo.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Excessive exposure to manganese (Mn), an essential trace element, has been shown to be neurotoxic, especially when inhaled. Few studies have examined potential effects of Mn on cognitive functions of environmentally exposed children.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20936744 PMCID: PMC2957930 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0901229
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Characteristics of the study population by group of exposure.
| Characteristic | Control ( | Exposed ( |
|---|---|---|
| Children | ||
| No. female | 52 | 47 |
| Age (years) | 9.1 ± 1.5 | 9.8 ± 1.3 |
| Education (years) | 3.1 ± 1.4 | 3.5 ± 1.3 |
| Hb (g/dL) | 14.1 ± 0.9 | 13.7 ± 0.8 |
| Anemia (Hb < 12 g/dL) | 1 | 2 |
| Stunting | 12 | 21 |
| Wasting | 3 | 5 |
| Overweight | 12 | 1 |
| Families | ||
| No. of children | ||
| 1–3 | 52 | 44 |
| ≥ 4 | 48 | 56 |
| Mother’s age (years) | 34.7 ± 6.0 | 35.0 ± 7.0 |
| Raven raw scores | 21.1 ± 6.5 | 16.7 ± 5.8 |
| Maternal education (years) | 5.8 ± 3.2 | 4.9 ± 3.7 |
| Married or living together | 93 | 86 |
| Housewife | 89 | 92 |
| Father’s occupation | ||
| Miner | 1 | 20 |
| Farmer | 39 | 41 |
| Construction worker | 10 | 9 |
| Others | 50 | 30 |
| Fuel for cooking purposes | ||
| Firewood | 36 | 40 |
| Gas | 11 | 19 |
| Both | 53 | 41 |
Values are percent or mean ± SD.
p < 0.05
p < 0.01, and
p < 0.001 comparing exposed and control groups.
Biomarkers of exposure: MnH, MnB, and PbB.
| Percentile of distribution | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | GM | 95% CI | Min | 50% | 75% | 90% | 95% | Max |
| MnH (μg/g) | ||||||||
| Control | 0.57 | 0.50–0.66 | 0.06 | 0.56 | 0.80 | 1.28 | 2.00 | 3.64 |
| Exposed | 12.13 | 10.68–13.77 | 4.20 | 12.60 | 17.80 | 24.00 | 34.00 | 48.00 |
| MnB (μg/L) | ||||||||
| Control | 8.22 | 7.81–8.66 | 5.00 | 8.00 | 9.50 | 11.50 | 13.00 | 14.00 |
| Exposed | 9.71 | 9.16–10.30 | 5.50 | 9.50 | 12.00 | 13.50 | 14.00 | 18.00 |
| PbB (μg/dL) | ||||||||
| Control | 7.96 | 7.32–8.64 | 1.85 | 8.00 | 10.50 | 12.50 | 15.50 | 22.50 |
| Exposed | 3.37 | 2.91–3.90 | 0.50 | 3.30 | 5.50 | 7.50 | 8.50 | 13.50 |
Abbreviations: GM, geometric mean; Max, maximum; Min, minimum.
p < 0.001 comparing exposed and control groups.
WISC-R age-standardized scores by group of exposure (mean ± SD).
| Measure | Control | Exposed |
|---|---|---|
| Total IQ | 82.2 ± 14.7 | 75.1 ± 11.3 |
| Verbal IQ | 87.3 ± 14.1 | 79.4 ± 12.0 |
| Information | 6.6 ± 2.9 | 5.4 ± 2.5 |
| Similarities | 6.0 ± 3.7 | 6.1 ± 3.4 |
| Arithmetic | 10.2 ± 3.1 | 8.6 ± 2.8 |
| Vocabulary | 9.2 ± 3.3 | 7.2 ± 3.3 |
| Comprehension | 7.8 ± 2.5 | 6.2 ± 2.0 |
| Digit span | 6.4 ± 2.8 | 5.4 ± 2.3 |
| Performance IQ | 79.6 ± 15.1 | 74.4 ± 13.0 |
| Picture completion | 7.6 ± 3.1 | 6.6 ± 2.5 |
| Picture arrangement | 6.5 ± 3.4 | 5.6 ± 2.9 |
| Block design | 7.2 ± 3.1 | 6.7 ± 3.3 |
| Object assembly | 6.9 ± 3.1 | 6.0 ± 3.0 |
| Coding | 6.6 ± 3.1 | 5.9 ± 3.1 |
| Mazes | 10.4 ± 3.7 | 8.8 ± 3.4 |
Verbal IQ was calculated based on five subtests (information, similarities, arithmetic, vocabulary, and comprehension).
Performance IQ was calculated based on five subtests (picture completion, picture arrangement, block design, object assembly, and coding).
p < 0.05
p < 0.01, and
p < 0.001 comparing exposed and control groups.
Simple and multiple linear regression models on IQ outcomes and Mn biomarkers [β (95% CI); n = 172 children].
| Model | Total IQ | Verbal IQ | Performance IQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple regression models for each of the biomarkers of exposure | |||
| MnH (μg/g) | −0.20 (−0.42 to 0.02) | −0.29 (−0.51 to −0.08) | −0.08 (−0.32 to 0.16) |
| MnB (μg/L) | −0.40 (−1.19 to 0.39) | −0.69 (−1.48 to 0.09) | 0.02 (−0.80 to 0.83) |
| PbB (μg/dL) | 0.24 (−0.32 to 0.81) | 0.45 (−0.10 to 1.01) | −0.02 (−0.63 to 0.60) |
| Multiple regression models for MnH with product terms | |||
| MnH (μg/g) | −1.60 (−3.09 to −0.10) | −1.48 (−2.99 to 0.04) | −1.45 (−3.162 to 0.27) |
| PbB ≥ 6 μg/dL | −0.72 (−4.72 to 3.28) | −0.43 (−4.49 to 3.63) | −0.84 (−5.45 to 3.77) |
| Age (years) | −3.35 (−4.83 to −1.88) | −3.39 (−4.89 to −1.89) | −2.76 (−4.45 to −1.07) |
| MnH × age | 0.14 (−0.01 to 0.28) | 0.12 (−0.03 to 0.27) | 0.12 (−0.04 to 0.29) |
| Male sex | 1.51 (−2.94 to 5.96) | 2.64 (−1.89 to 7.17) | −0.64 (−5.83 to 4.56) |
| MnH × sex | 0.38 (−0.02 to 0.77) | 0.28 (−0.12 to 0.68) | 0.49 (0.04 to 0.95) |
| Hb (mg/dL) | 2.77 (0.63 to 4.91) | 2.71 (0.54 to 4.88) | 2.36 (−0.11 to 4.84) |
| Maternal education (years) | 0.97 (0.45 to 1.49) | 0.85 (0.32 to 1.37) | 0.92 (0.32 to 1.53) |
| 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.18 | |
| Multiple regression models for MnB with product terms | |||
| MnB (μg/L) | −2.18 (−6.93 to 2.57) | −3.50 (−8.13 to 1.13) | −2.29 (−7.58 to 2.99) |
| PbB ≥ 6 μg/dL | −1.02 (−4.68 to 2.65) | −0.80 (−4.38 to 2.78) | −1.02 (−5.09 to 3.04) |
| Age (years) | −4.45 (−9.15 to 0.25) | −5.79 (−10.37 to −1.20) | −4.30 (−9.53 to 0.94) |
| MnB × age | 0.20 (−0.30 to 0.69) | 0.31 (−0.18 to 0.79) | 0.26 (−0.29 to 0.81) |
| Male sex | 4.03 (0.51 to 7.56) | 4.65 (1.20 to 8.10) | 2.86 (−1.04 to 6.76) |
| Hb (mg/dL) | 3.26 (1.13 to 5.39) | 3.32 (1.25 to 5.40) | 1.78 (−0.61 to 4.17) |
| Maternal education (years) | 0.92 (0.39 to 1.44) | 0.85 (0.34 to 1.37) | 0.94 (0.36 to 1.52) |
| | 0.25 | 0.29 | 0.15 |
MnB × sex was not included because it was not significant with p < 0.20.
Figure 1Modification by age and sex of the association between Mn exposure and Total IQ: association between MnH and Total IQ by age for girls (A) and for boys (B) and between MnB and Total IQ by age for all (C). Graphs were constructed with the computed point estimates and CIs (black lines) for the linear combinations of coefficients after the multiple regression with the significant product terms (results in Table 4).