PURPOSE: The use of MRI to monitor immune cell infiltration into various pathologies is well established. In an effort to boost the magnetic material within immune cells, this work attempted to label resting monocytes within bone marrow, in mice, by intravenous administration of micron-sized iron oxide particles (MPIOs), similar in fashion to the administration of (U)SPIO. PROCEDURES: MPIOs were incubated with various immune cells both in culture, and in whole blood. Flow cytometry and histology were used to analyze magnetic cell labeling. Also, MPIOs were injected intravenously into mice. In vivo, high-resolution 3-D MRI was performed on mouse legs, and signal changes were quantified. Flow cytometry and histology were used to analyze magnetic cell labeling of bone marrow resident cells. RESULTS: It is demonstrated here that monocytes and neutrophils can indeed endocytose MPIOs both in cell culture and ex vivo in whole blood. However, despite rapid accumulation of MPIOs within the bone marrow following injection, MPIOs did not label monocytes or any other hematopoietic cell type in the marrow. Hypotheses are drawn to explain these results in light of recent usage of MPIOs for immune cell tracking. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic administration of various MPIO formulations showed that MPIOs arrive in bone marrow rapidly following injection and remain there for at least 7 days. Data also shows slow clearance of some particles from the tissue over this period. While MPIOs can efficiently label monocytes in culture and in whole blood ex vivo, they were not found to label bone marrow resident monocytes.
PURPOSE: The use of MRI to monitor immune cell infiltration into various pathologies is well established. In an effort to boost the magnetic material within immune cells, this work attempted to label resting monocytes within bone marrow, in mice, by intravenous administration of micron-sized iron oxide particles (MPIOs), similar in fashion to the administration of (U)SPIO. PROCEDURES: MPIOs were incubated with various immune cells both in culture, and in whole blood. Flow cytometry and histology were used to analyze magnetic cell labeling. Also, MPIOs were injected intravenously into mice. In vivo, high-resolution 3-D MRI was performed on mouse legs, and signal changes were quantified. Flow cytometry and histology were used to analyze magnetic cell labeling of bone marrow resident cells. RESULTS: It is demonstrated here that monocytes and neutrophils can indeed endocytose MPIOs both in cell culture and ex vivo in whole blood. However, despite rapid accumulation of MPIOs within the bone marrow following injection, MPIOs did not label monocytes or any other hematopoietic cell type in the marrow. Hypotheses are drawn to explain these results in light of recent usage of MPIOs for immune cell tracking. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic administration of various MPIO formulations showed that MPIOs arrive in bone marrow rapidly following injection and remain there for at least 7 days. Data also shows slow clearance of some particles from the tissue over this period. While MPIOs can efficiently label monocytes in culture and in whole blood ex vivo, they were not found to label bone marrow resident monocytes.
Authors: Kathleen A Hinds; Jonathan M Hill; Erik M Shapiro; Mikko O Laukkanen; Alfonso C Silva; Christian A Combs; Timothy R Varney; Robert S Balaban; Alan P Koretsky; Cynthia E Dunbar Journal: Blood Date: 2003-04-03 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Erik M Shapiro; Stanko Skrtic; Kathryn Sharer; Jonathan M Hill; Cynthia E Dunbar; Alan P Koretsky Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-07-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: B J Dardzinski; V J Schmithorst; S K Holland; G P Boivin; T Imagawa; S Watanabe; J M Lewis; R Hirsch Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Andreas Saleh; Michael Schroeter; Adrian Ringelstein; Hans-Peter Hartung; Mario Siebler; Ulrich Mödder; Sebastian Jander Journal: Stroke Date: 2007-08-23 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Qing Ye; Yijen L Wu; Lesley M Foley; T Kevin Hitchens; Danielle F Eytan; Haval Shirwan; Chien Ho Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-07-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mi Kyong Yoo; In Young Park; In Yong Kim; In Kyu Park; Jin-Sook Kwon; Hwan-Jeong Jeong; Yong Yeon Jeong; Chong Su Cho Journal: J Nanosci Nanotechnol Date: 2008-10
Authors: Simon P S Howarth; Tjun Y Tang; Martin J Graves; Jean-Marie U-King-Im; Zhi-Yong Li; Stewart R Walsh; Michael E Gaunt; Jonathan H Gillard Journal: Ann Surg Innov Res Date: 2007-02-21
Authors: Peter Chhour; Johoon Kim; Barbara Benardo; Alfredo Tovar; Shaameen Mian; Harold I Litt; Victor A Ferrari; David P Cormode Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2016-11-18 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Stacey M Forton; Matthew T Latourette; Maciej Parys; Matti Kiupel; Dena Shahriari; Jeff S Sakamoto; Erik M Shapiro Journal: ACS Biomater Sci Eng Date: 2016-02-29
Authors: Li Liu; T Kevin Hitchens; Qing Ye; Yijen Wu; Brent Barbe; Devin E Prior; Wendy F Li; Fang-Cheng Yeh; Lesley M Foley; Daniel J Bain; Chien Ho Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2013-02-08
Authors: Sébastien Serres; Silvy Mardiguian; Sandra J Campbell; Martina A McAteer; Asim Akhtar; Alexandre Krapitchev; Robin P Choudhury; Daniel C Anthony; Nicola R Sibson Journal: FASEB J Date: 2011-09-09 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Dwayne R Roach; Wesley M Garrett; Glenn Welch; Thomas J Caperna; Neil C Talbot; Erik M Shapiro Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ashley V Makela; Melissa A Schott; Olivia C Sehl; Julia J Gevaert; Paula J Foster; Christopher H Contag Journal: Nanoscale Adv Date: 2022-07-25
Authors: Richard Harrison; Hilda Anaid Lugo Leija; Stephanie Strohbuecker; James Crutchley; Sarah Marsh; Chris Denning; Alicia El Haj; Virginie Sottile Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 6.832
Authors: Gabrielle M Siegers; Shruti Krishnamoorthy; Laura E Gonzalez-Lara; Catherine McFadden; Yuhua Chen; Paula J Foster Journal: Tomography Date: 2016-03