OBJECTIVES: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most effective treatment for severe or treatment resistant depression; however, the lack of widely accepted methods for determining when ECT is indicated may contribute to disparities and variation in use. We examined receipt of ECT among depressed patients in the largest coordinated health system in the US, the Veterans Health Administration. METHODS: Using administrative data, we conducted a multivariable logistic regression to identify individual clinical and sociodemographic predictors of receiving ECT, including variables of geographic accessibility to ECT, among patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder between 1999 and 2004. RESULTS: 307 (0.16%) of 187,811 patients diagnosed with major depression received ECT during the study period. Black patients were less likely to receive ECT than whites (odds ratio 0.33; 95% confidence interval: 0.20, 0.55), and patients living in the South (OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.95) or West (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.42, 0.82) were less likely to receive ECT than patients living in the central US. Patients whose closest VA facility provided ECT had a higher likelihood of receiving ECT (OR: 3.02; 95% CI: 2.22, 4.10). Depressed patients with no major medical comorbidities were also more likely to receive ECT (OR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.65, 3.55). LIMITATIONS: Findings are not adjusted for depression severity. CONCLUSIONS: ECT use for major depression was relatively uncommon. Race, US region, geographic accessibility, and general medical health were all associated with whether or not patients received ECT. Clinicians and health systems should work to provide equitable access and more consistent use of this safe and effective treatment. Published by Elsevier B.V.
OBJECTIVES: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most effective treatment for severe or treatment resistant depression; however, the lack of widely accepted methods for determining when ECT is indicated may contribute to disparities and variation in use. We examined receipt of ECT among depressedpatients in the largest coordinated health system in the US, the Veterans Health Administration. METHODS: Using administrative data, we conducted a multivariable logistic regression to identify individual clinical and sociodemographic predictors of receiving ECT, including variables of geographic accessibility to ECT, among patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder between 1999 and 2004. RESULTS: 307 (0.16%) of 187,811 patients diagnosed with major depression received ECT during the study period. Black patients were less likely to receive ECT than whites (odds ratio 0.33; 95% confidence interval: 0.20, 0.55), and patients living in the South (OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.95) or West (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.42, 0.82) were less likely to receive ECT than patients living in the central US. Patients whose closest VA facility provided ECT had a higher likelihood of receiving ECT (OR: 3.02; 95% CI: 2.22, 4.10). Depressedpatients with no major medical comorbidities were also more likely to receive ECT (OR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.65, 3.55). LIMITATIONS: Findings are not adjusted for depression severity. CONCLUSIONS: ECT use for major depression was relatively uncommon. Race, US region, geographic accessibility, and general medical health were all associated with whether or not patients received ECT. Clinicians and health systems should work to provide equitable access and more consistent use of this safe and effective treatment. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Authors: Brenda Sirovich; Patricia M Gallagher; David E Wennberg; Elliott S Fisher Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2008 May-Jun Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi; Stephen R Wisniewski; Andrew A Nierenberg; Jonathan W Stewart; Diane Warden; George Niederehe; Michael E Thase; Philip W Lavori; Barry D Lebowitz; Patrick J McGrath; Jerrold F Rosenbaum; Harold A Sackeim; David J Kupfer; James Luther; Maurizio Fava Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Mark D Williams; Teresa Rummans; Shirlene Sampson; Rebecca Knapp; Martina Mueller; Mustafa M Husain; Max Fink; Keith Rasmussen; Kevin O'Connor; Glenn Smith; George Petrides; Charles H Kellner Journal: J ECT Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 3.635
Authors: John F McCarthy; Frederic C Blow; Marcia Valenstein; Ellen P Fischer; Richard R Owen; Kristen L Barry; Teresa J Hudson; Rosalinda V Ignacio Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: William H Crown; Stan Finkelstein; Ernst R Berndt; Davina Ling; Amy W Poret; A John Rush; James M Russell Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Kara Zivin; H Myra Kim; John F McCarthy; Karen L Austin; Katherine J Hoggatt; Heather Walters; Marcia Valenstein Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-10-30 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Marcia Valenstein; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Dara Ganoczy; John F McCarthy; Kara Zivin; Karen L Austin; Katherine Hoggatt; Daniel Eisenberg; John D Piette; Frederic C Blow; Mark Olfson Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2008-10-22 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Brady G Case; David N Bertollo; Eugene M Laska; Lawrence H Price; Carole E Siegel; Mark Olfson; Steven C Marcus Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-10-08 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Tyler S Kaster; Daniel M Blumberger; Tara Gomes; Rinku Sutradhar; Zafiris J Dasklakis; Duminda N Wijeysundera; Simone N Vigod Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2020-07-02 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Joseph A Hyder; Jonathan Niconchuk; Laurent G Glance; Mark D Neuman; Robert R Cima; Richard P Dutton; Louis L Nguyen; Lee A Fleisher; Angela M Bader Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 5.108