Literature DB >> 20933255

Identification of patient groups at highest risk from traditional approach to ovarian cancer treatment.

Giovanni D Aletti1, Eric L Eisenhauer, Antonio Santillan, Allison Axtell, Giacomo Aletti, Christine Holschneider, Dennis S Chi, Robert E Bristow, William A Cliby.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Define subgroups of patients at highest risk for major morbidity and mortality after a traditional approach of maximal surgical efforts followed by chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer (AOC).
METHODS: Preoperative health, intra-operative findings and outcomes were assessed in consecutive patients with primary AOC from 4 centers. Initial tumor dissemination was stratified into 3 groups based on volume of disease. Surgery was categorized using a previously described surgical complexity score (SCS). Statistical analysis was directed toward validating a multivariable risk-adjusted model.
RESULTS: 576 patients with stage IIIC (N=447, 77.6%) or IV AOC (N=129, 22.4%) were analyzed. Age (HR (per year): 1.02; 95%CI: 1.01-1.03), high tumor dissemination (HTD) (HR: 1.73; 95%CI: 1.19-2.56), residual disease (RD) >1 cm (HR: 2.46; 95%CI: 1.74-3.53), and stage IV (HR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.51-2.45), independently correlated with OS. We identified a small subgroup of patients who comprised a high-risk group (N=38, 6.6%) characterized by all of the following characteristics: high initial tumor dissemination (HTD) or stage IV plus poor performance or nutritional status plus age ≥ 75. In this group, high SCS to achieve low RD was associated with morbidity of 63.6% and limited survival benefit.
CONCLUSIONS: Optimal management of AOC requires accurate, risk-adjusted predictors of outcomes allowing a tailored approach starting with primary therapy. Complex surgical procedures to render low RD improve survival, and in the majority of cases, the benefits of such surgery appear to outweigh the morbidity. However careful analysis identifies a subgroup of patients in whom an alternative approach may be the better strategy.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20933255     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  54 in total

1.  The American College of Surgeon's surgical risk calculator's ability to predict disposition in older gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy.

Authors:  Salma Shaker; Colleen Rivard; Rebi Nahum; Rachel I Vogel; Deanna Teoh
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 3.599

2.  Risk stratification and outcomes of women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Sonali Patankar; William M Burke; June Y Hou; Ana I Tergas; Yongmei Huang; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Metformin intake is associated with better survival in ovarian cancer: a case-control study.

Authors:  Sanjeev Kumar; Alexandra Meuter; Prabin Thapa; Carrie Langstraat; Shailendra Giri; Jeremy Chien; Ramandeep Rattan; William Cliby; Viji Shridhar
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the Medicare cohort with advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Melissa M Thrall; Heidi J Gray; Rebecca Gaston Symons; Noel S Weiss; David R Flum; Barbara A Goff
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  S3-Guideline on Diagnostics, Therapy and Follow-up of Malignant Ovarian Tumours: Short version 1.0 - AWMF registration number: 032/035OL, June 2013.

Authors:  U Wagner; P Harter; F Hilpert; S Mahner; A Reuß; A du Bois; E Petru; W Meier; P Ortner; K König; K Lindel; D Grab; P Piso; O Ortmann; I Runnebaum; J Pfisterer; D Lüftner; N Frickhofen; F Grünwald; B O Maier; J Diebold; S Hauptmann; F Kommoss; G Emons; B Radeleff; M Gebhardt; N Arnold; G Calaminus; I Weisse; J Weis; J Sehouli; D Fink; A Burges; A Hasenburg; C Eggert
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Laparoscopic Surgical Algorithm to Triage the Timing of Tumor Reductive Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Nicole D Fleming; Alpa M Nick; Robert L Coleman; Shannon N Westin; Pedro T Ramirez; Pamela T Soliman; Bryan Fellman; Larissa A Meyer; Kathleen M Schmeler; Karen H Lu; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  A preoperative personalized risk assessment calculator for elderly ovarian cancer patients undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery.

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Sarah Rutstein; William C Miller; Paola A Gehrig
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Intraperitoneal chemotherapy after interval debulking surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: Feasibility and outcomes at a comprehensive cancer center.

Authors:  Jennifer J Mueller; Amelia Kelly; Qin Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; Kara Long Roche; Yukio Sonoda; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Oliver Zivanovic; Dennis S Chi; Ginger J Gardner
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Less guessing, more evidence in identifying patients least fit for cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: A triage algorithm to individualize surgical management.

Authors:  Deepa Maheswari Narasimhulu; Amanika Kumar; Amy L Weaver; Carrie L Langstraat; William A Cliby
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  The use of CT findings to predict extent of tumor at primary surgery for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Gretchen Glaser; Michelle Torres; Bohyun Kim; Giovanni Aletti; Amy Weaver; Andrea Mariani; Lynn Hartmann; William Cliby
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.