BACKGROUND: We hypothesize that an anatomic repair of the distal biceps tendon would recreate native tendon moment arm and forearm rotation, while a nonanatomic insertion would compromise moment arm and forearm rotation. METHODS: Isometric supination torque was measured at 60° of pronation, neutral, and 60° of supination for the native distal biceps tendon and 4 repair points in 6 cadaveric specimens using a computer controlled elbow simulator. The slope of the regression line fitted to the torque versus biceps load data was used to define the moment arm for each attachment location. Range of motion testing was performed by incrementally loading the biceps, while measuring the supination motion generated using a digital goniometer. RESULTS: Tendon location and forearm position significantly affected the moment arm of the biceps (P < .05). Anatomic repair in all forearm positions showed no significant difference from the native insertion. Moment arm for an anterior center repair was significantly lower in supination (-97%) and neutral (-27%) and also produced significantly less supination motion. No difference was observed between all tendon locations in pronation. CONCLUSIONS: Reattachment of the biceps to its anatomic location, as opposed to a more anterior central position, is critical in reestablishing native tendon biomechanics. Clinically, these findings would suggest that patients with a biceps repair might experience the most weakness in a supinated position without experiencing a deficit in the pronated forearm.
BACKGROUND: We hypothesize that an anatomic repair of the distal biceps tendon would recreate native tendon moment arm and forearm rotation, while a nonanatomic insertion would compromise moment arm and forearm rotation. METHODS: Isometric supination torque was measured at 60° of pronation, neutral, and 60° of supination for the native distal biceps tendon and 4 repair points in 6 cadaveric specimens using a computer controlled elbow simulator. The slope of the regression line fitted to the torque versus biceps load data was used to define the moment arm for each attachment location. Range of motion testing was performed by incrementally loading the biceps, while measuring the supination motion generated using a digital goniometer. RESULTS: Tendon location and forearm position significantly affected the moment arm of the biceps (P < .05). Anatomic repair in all forearm positions showed no significant difference from the native insertion. Moment arm for an anterior center repair was significantly lower in supination (-97%) and neutral (-27%) and also produced significantly less supination motion. No difference was observed between all tendon locations in pronation. CONCLUSIONS: Reattachment of the biceps to its anatomic location, as opposed to a more anterior central position, is critical in reestablishing native tendon biomechanics. Clinically, these findings would suggest that patients with a biceps repair might experience the most weakness in a supinated position without experiencing a deficit in the pronated forearm.
Authors: Michel P J van den Bekerom; Izaäk F Kodde; Asir Aster; Ronald L A W Bleys; Denise Eygendaal Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2014-09-18 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Sebastian Siebenlist; Stephanie C Fischer; Gunther H Sandmann; Philipp Ahrens; Petra Wolf; Ulrich Stöckle; Andreas B Imhoff; Peter U Brucker Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Ruby Grewal; George S Athwal; Joy C MacDermid; Kenneth J Faber; Darren S Drosdowech; Graham J W King Journal: JBJS Essent Surg Tech Date: 2012-11-28