Literature DB >> 20932523

Comparison of soft-tissue serum markers in stable intertrochanteric fracture: dynamic hip screw versus proximal femoral nail—A preliminary study.

Jae-Young Hong1, Seung-Woo Suh, Jung-Ho Park, Young-Soo Shin, Jung-Ro Yoon, Jae-Hyuk Yang.   

Abstract

DESIGN: Prospective randomised comparative study.
OBJECTIVES: To analyse and compare serum soft-tissue marker differences after dynamic hip screw (DHS)and proximal femoral nail (PFN) fixation of stable intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty elderly patients (>60 years old) with a stable intertrochanteric fracture were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into two groups of 10 each according to the device used (DHS or PFN). All 20 patients had a stable intertrochanteric fracture, and all were operated on by the same surgeon using minimal invasive approach. A biochemical comparison of soft-tissue serum markers was performed. The serum markers examined were haemoglobin (Hb), haematocrit (Hct), creatine kinase (CK), myoglobin (MYO), troponin I and C-reactive protein (CRP), and their levels were determined before surgery, and 1, 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 h after surgery. Differences between the DHS and PFN groups were compared.
RESULTS: No inter-group differences were observed with respect to preoperative demographics,operation time, incision length or blood loss. In terms of serum markers, both methods showed similar patterns of change for CK, MYO and CRP pre- to post-operatively. In addition, pre- and postoperative Hb and Hct levels were similar. Furthermore, no inter-group differences were observed between the absolute values of serum markers at any point.
CONCLUSION: The absolute values and temporal changes of serum markers were similar in the two study groups. These findings suggest that DHS and PFN fixation of stable intertrochanteric fractures produce similar levels of soft-tissue damage. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20932523     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of functional recovery in the very early period after surgery between plate and nail fixation for correction of stable femoral intertrochanteric fractures: a controlled clinical trial of 18 patients.

Authors:  Koun Yamauchi; Kazunari Fushimi; Goshi Shirai; Masashi Fukuta
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

Review 2.  Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Richard Macey; Joseph Lewis; Jamie Stokes; James R Gill; Jonathan A Cook; William Gp Eardley; Martyn J Parker; Xavier L Griffin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-02-10

Review 3.  Cephalomedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in older adults.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Richard Macey; James R Gill; Martyn J Parker; Xavier L Griffin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-01-26

4.  A Study of Inflammatory/Necrosis Biomarkers in the Fracture of the Femur Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation.

Authors:  Mariapaola Marino; Giuseppe Palmieri; Marco Peruzzi; Flavia Scuderi; Emanuela Bartoccioni
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 4.711

5.  Analysis of risk factor for nail breakage in patients with mechanical failures after proximal femoral nail antirotation in intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Lee; Jung-Taek Kim; Chan Ho Park; Ji-Ung Song; Tae-Young Kim; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Dynamic hip screw versus intramedullary nailing for the treatment of A1 intertrochanteric fractures: A retrospective, comparative study and cost analysis.

Authors:  Mattia Alessio-Mazzola; Giacomo Traverso; Francesco Coccarello; Francesca Sanguineti; Matteo Formica
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2022-07-06

7.  Treatment of AO/OTA 31-A3 intertrochanteric femoral fractures with a percutaneous compression plate.

Authors:  Fei Luo; Jie Shen; Jianzhong Xu; Shiwu Dong; Qiang Huang; Zhao Xie
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Proximal femoral nails anti-rotation versus dynamic hip screws for treatment of stable intertrochanteric femur fractures: an outcome analyses with a minimum 4 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Weiguang Yu; Xinchao Zhang; Xingfei Zhu; Zuochong Yu; Yinfeng Xu; Guoqing Zha; Jun Hu; Jianhua Yi; Yunjiang Liu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Comparison of efficacy, complications and TGF-β2 expression between DHS and PFNA in elderly patients with osteoporotic femoral intertrochanteric fracture.

Authors:  Rao Xu; Jiangying Ru; Feng Ji; Jie Liu; Yong Ji; Zhiquan Wu; Dai Shi
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.447

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.