Literature DB >> 20932464

Patient perspectives on decision making in heart failure.

Dan D Matlock1, Carolyn T Nowels, David B Bekelman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure (HF) face an array of challenging decisions involving medications, devices, and transplants. The goal of this qualitative study was to describe patients' perceptions surrounding difficult decisions along with factors that influenced their decisions. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We studied 22 patients with symptomatic HF from the University of Colorado Hospital using in-depth, semistructured interviews. We used descriptive theme analysis in an iterative process to analyze responses to the question: "Can you tell me about any important or difficult decisions you have had to make about your heart condition?" Two distinct decision-making styles emerged: active (55%) and passive (45%). Active decision makers identified interventions such as implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, medications, and transplants to be the most difficult decisions and weighed concerns for side effects, family, and quality of life. Passive decision makers generally did not identify a difficult decision and described factors such as trust in God, trust in the physician, and power of the physician as reasons for their passivity.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HF use active and passive decision styles in their approach to medical decision making. Future work should investigate communication techniques to assure that passive decision makers receive health care that is concordant with their values.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20932464     DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Fail        ISSN: 1071-9164            Impact factor:   5.712


  6 in total

1.  Feasibility and acceptability of a decision aid designed for people facing advanced or terminal illness: a pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  Dan D Matlock; Tarah A E Keech; Marlene B McKenzie; Michael R Bronsert; Carolyn T Nowels; Jean S Kutner
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  "It's not broke, so let's not try to fix it": why patients decline a cardiovascular implantable electronic device.

Authors:  Abigale L Ottenberg; Paul S Mueller; Rachel J Topazian; Sharon Kaufman; Keith M Swetz
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 3.  Making decisions about implantable cardioverter-defibrillators from implantation to end of life: an integrative review of patients' perspectives.

Authors:  Krystina B Lewis; Dawn Stacey; Dan D Matlock
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  A qualitative, grounded theory exploration of the determinants of self-care behavior among Indian patients with a lived experience of chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Deepak Y Kamath; K B Bhuvana; Luke Joshua Salazar; Kiron Varghese; Anant Kamath; Jyoti Idiculla; Prem Pais; Shruthi Kulkarni; Bradi B Granger; Denis Xavier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Assessment of the quality of existing patient educational tools focused on sudden cardiac arrest: a systematic evaluation by the Sudden Cardiac Arrest Thought Leadership Alliance.

Authors:  Garrett Hazelton; Sana M Al-Khatib; Gregg C Fonarow; Kevin L Thomas; David Hayes; Gillian D Sanders; Susan M Campbell; Clyde Yancy; Eric D Peterson; Samuel Sears
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.711

6.  Development and feasibility testing of decision support for patients who are candidates for a prophylactic implantable defibrillator: a study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sandra L Carroll; Michael McGillion; Dawn Stacey; Jeff S Healey; Gina Browne; Heather M Arthur; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.279

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.