Literature DB >> 20932408

A population-based comparison of cancer-control rates between radical and partial nephrectomy for T1A renal cell carcinoma.

Maxime Crépel1, Claudio Jeldres, Maxine Sun, Giovanni Lughezzani, Hendrik Isbarn, Ahmed Alasker, Umberto Capitanio, Shahrokh F Shariat, Philippe Arjane, Hugues Widmer, Markus Graefen, Francesco Montorsi, Paul Perrotte, Pierre I Karakiewicz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To complement existing data with population-based cancer control outcomes that account for the effect of other-cause mortality (OCM). Cancer control rates are virtually equivalent between partial (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) for patients with T1aN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC). To date, only 6 studies from centers of excellence examined cancer control rates after PN vs RN for T1aN0M0 RCC. OCM was unaccounted for in those studies, which may introduce a bias. We relied on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database and assessed cancer-specific mortality (CSM) after either PN or RN for T1aN0M0 RCC, in competing-risks models.
METHODS: Between 1988 and 2004, the SEER-9 database identified 1622 PN (22.3%) and 5658 RN (77.7%) T1aN0M0 RCC. Competing-risks regression models, controlling for OCM and matched for age, year of surgery, tumor size, and Fuhrman grade, addressed the effect of nephrectomy type (PN vs RN) on CSM.
RESULTS: At 5 years, in a PN and RN matched-population controlling for OCM, CSM after PN and RN was respectively 1.8% vs 2.5% (P = .5). The CSM rates in this cohort for patients aged ≥ 70 years were respectively 1.0% and 3.4% (P = .7).
CONCLUSIONS: This competing-risks population-based analysis confirmed the CSM equivalence between PN and RN for T1aN0M0 RCC and showed virtually perfect CSM-free rates (97.5% or better) even in older patients. Crown
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20932408     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  18 in total

1.  Partial nephrectomy for T1b renal cell carcinoma: A safe and superior treatment option.

Authors:  Ross J Mason; Ricardo A Rendon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Surgeon-specific factors affecting treatment decisions among Canadian urologists in the management of pT1a renal tumours.

Authors:  Alexandra Leora Millman; Kenneth T Pace; Michael Ordon; Jason Young Lee
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Radical versus partial nephrectomy, chronic kidney disease progression and mortality in US veterans.

Authors:  Elani Streja; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Miklos Z Molnar; Jaime Landman; Onyebuchi A Arah; Csaba P Kovesdy
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 4.  Kidney function outcomes following thermal ablation of small renal masses.

Authors:  Jay D Raman; Syed M Jafri; David Qi
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2016-05-06

5.  Renal cell carcinoma stage migration in a single European centre over 25 years: effects on 5- and 10-year metastasis-free survival.

Authors:  Martin Pichler; Georg C Hutterer; Thomas F Chromecki; Johanna Jesche; Karin Kampel-Kettner; Karl Pummer; Richard Zigeuner
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Positive surgical margins during partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: Results from Canadian Kidney Cancer information system (CKCis) collaborative.

Authors:  Rahul K Bansal; Simon Tanguay; Antonio Finelli; Ricardo Rendon; Ronald B Moore; Rodney H Breau; Louis Lacombe; Peter C Black; Jun Kawakami; Darrel Drachenberg; Stephen Pautler; Olli Saarela; Zhihui Liu; Michael A S Jewett; Anil Kapoor
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Therapeutic and Clinical Outcomes of Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Cryoablation for T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Toshihiro Uemura; Taigo Kato; Akira Nagahara; Atsunari Kawashima; Koji Hatano; Takeshi Ujike; Yusuke Ono; Hiroki Higashihara; Kazutoshi Fujita; Shinichiro Fukuhara; Hiroshi Kiuchi; Ryoichi Imamura; Noriyuki Tomiyama; Norio Nonomura; Motohide Uemura
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 8.  Current Status of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Zachary L Smith
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 9.  Surgical management of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Laura-Maria Krabbe; Aditya Bagrodia; Vitaly Margulis; Christopher G Wood
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.513

10.  Survival benefit of nephron-sparing surgery for patients with pT1b renal cell carcinoma: A population-based study.

Authors:  Xiaode Liu; Xuemei Huang; Pan Zhao; Peng Zhang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.