Literature DB >> 20932190

Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacral colpopexy: initial experience in a high-volume laparoscopic reference center.

Evanguelos Xylinas1, Idir Ouzaid, Xavier Durand, Guillaume Ploussard, Laurent Salomon, Norman Gillion, Dimitri Vordos, Andras Hoznek, Clément-Claude Abbou, Alexandre de la Taille.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the surgical technique of robot-assisted sacral colpopexy (RASCP) and to assess its feasibility and safety in a high-volume laparoscopic center. PATIENT AND METHODS: 12 women with symptomatic urogenital prolapse with or without concomitant urinary stress incontinence were treated with RASCP by one surgeon at our institution. The preoperative workup involved a detailed urologica and gynecologic history and physical examination to determine the type, the degree of the prolapse and the presence of concomitant stress urinary incontinence.
RESULTS: Mean operative time was 144 minutes (range 120-180 min). No conversion to a laparoscopic or open procedure was necessary. The mean patient age was 57.1 years old (range 44-79). The mean estimated blood loss was 60 mL (range 20-200 mL). The mean catheterization time was 2 days, and the mean hospital stay was 3.4 days (range 3-4 d). At a mean follow-up of 19.1 months (range 8-28 mos), no recurrence of the prolapse occurred.
CONCLUSION: RASCP for treatment of patients with urogenital prolapse is a feasible alternative to open and laparoscopic procedures. It procures an anatomic repositioning of the pelvic organs. The short-term results and the complication rates are similar with gold standard techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20932190     DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  8 in total

Review 1.  Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Loic Sentilhes
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Robotic pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Kamran P Sajadi; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Prospective comparison of short-term functional outcomes obtained after pure laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Julien Seror; David R Yates; Elise Seringe; Christophe Vaessen; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Utilization and perioperative outcomes of robotic vaginal vault suspension compared to abdominal or vaginal approaches for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Hanhan Li; Jesse Sammon; Florian Roghmann; Akshay Sood; Michael Ehlert; Maxine Sun; Mani Menon; Humphrey Atiemo; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Robotic Sacrocolpopexy for Treatment of Apical Compartment Prolapse.

Authors:  Kwang Jin Ko; Kyu-Sung Lee
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 6.  Long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal robotic reconstructive pelvic floor surgery: a prospective study and overview of the literature.

Authors:  Femke van Zanten; Jan J van Iersel; Tim J C Paulides; Paul M Verheijen; Ivo A M J Broeders; Esther C J Consten; Egbert Lenters; Steven E Schraffordt Koops
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiang Yang; Yong He; Xiaoyi Zhang; Zhi Wang; Xiaohu Zuo; Likun Gao; Li Hong
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-03

8.  Mesh complications in female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery and their management: A systematic review.

Authors:  Hemendra N Shah; Gopal H Badlani
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.