OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated with histochemical analysis how the number of laser applications can affect the masseter muscle. BACKGROUND: In dentistry today, the laser is used in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), mainly for radiating pain in the masticatory muscles, whose origins may be associated with malocclusion, although the laser effects are not well understood on the cellular level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty mice (HRS/J lineage) were randomly distributed into groups according to the number of laser applications (three, six, and 10). For each group of laser applications (experimental, n = 5), it was considered the control group (n = 5), which was not irradiated. All animals inhaled halothane (2-bromo-2-chloro-1, 1, 1-trifluoroethane, minimum 99%, Sigma Aldrich, India) before each laser irradiation performed on the left masseter muscle region, on alternate days with 20 J/cm(2), 40 mW, for 20 sec. The muscle samples were collected for histochemical analysis with succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) enzyme 72 h after the last application. RESULTS: (a) A decrease in area of light fibers type (35.91% ± 6.9%; 32.08% ± 6.3%, and 27.88% ± 6.3%), according to the increase of laser applications (p < 0.05); (b) significant increase (p < 0.05) in the area of intermediate fibers, with an increase of laser application (11.08% ± 3.9%; 16.52% ± 5.7%, and 15.96% ± 3.9%), although the increase with 10 applications was small; (c) area increase of dark fibers in the group with three laser applications (0.16% ± 0.3%) (p < 0.05), and in groups with six and 10 laser applications, respectively (9.68% ± 6.0% and 9.60% ± 4.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The SDH enzyme activity revealed that the number of laser applications increases the metabolic pattern of the muscle fibers. A minimal difference in metabolic activity between six and 10 applications of a laser suggests that further analyses should be done to confirm that six applications are enough to produce the same clinical effects, thereby contributing data to professionals from different fields in regard to the cost-benefit ratio of this therapy.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated with histochemical analysis how the number of laser applications can affect the masseter muscle. BACKGROUND: In dentistry today, the laser is used in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), mainly for radiating pain in the masticatory muscles, whose origins may be associated with malocclusion, although the laser effects are not well understood on the cellular level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty mice (HRS/J lineage) were randomly distributed into groups according to the number of laser applications (three, six, and 10). For each group of laser applications (experimental, n = 5), it was considered the control group (n = 5), which was not irradiated. All animals inhaled halothane (2-bromo-2-chloro-1, 1, 1-trifluoroethane, minimum 99%, Sigma Aldrich, India) before each laser irradiation performed on the left masseter muscle region, on alternate days with 20 J/cm(2), 40 mW, for 20 sec. The muscle samples were collected for histochemical analysis with succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) enzyme 72 h after the last application. RESULTS: (a) A decrease in area of light fibers type (35.91% ± 6.9%; 32.08% ± 6.3%, and 27.88% ± 6.3%), according to the increase of laser applications (p < 0.05); (b) significant increase (p < 0.05) in the area of intermediate fibers, with an increase of laser application (11.08% ± 3.9%; 16.52% ± 5.7%, and 15.96% ± 3.9%), although the increase with 10 applications was small; (c) area increase of dark fibers in the group with three laser applications (0.16% ± 0.3%) (p < 0.05), and in groups with six and 10 laser applications, respectively (9.68% ± 6.0% and 9.60% ± 4.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The SDH enzyme activity revealed that the number of laser applications increases the metabolic pattern of the muscle fibers. A minimal difference in metabolic activity between six and 10 applications of a laser suggests that further analyses should be done to confirm that six applications are enough to produce the same clinical effects, thereby contributing data to professionals from different fields in regard to the cost-benefit ratio of this therapy.
Authors: Roberta M Brunelli; Natalia C Rodrigues; Daniel A Ribeiro; Kelly Fernandes; Angela Magri; Lívia Assis; Nivaldo A Parizotto; Alberto Cliquet; Ana Claudia M Renno; Daniela C C Abreu Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Lilian Chrystiane Giannasi; Miriam Yumi Matsui; Sandra Regina de Freitas Batista; Camila Teixeira Hardt; Carla Paes Gomes; José Benedito Oliveira Amorim; Isabella de Carvalho Aguiar; Luanda Collange; Israel Dos Reis Dos Santos; Ismael Souza Dias; Cláudia Santos de Oliveira; Luis Vicente Franco de Oliveira; Mônica Fernandes Gomes Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2012-05-15 Impact factor: 2.362