BACKGROUND: Nifurtimox has been used to treat Chagas disease for 40 years, but tolerance and safety data in adults are scarce. We aimed to evaluate nifurtimox tolerance and safety in a cohort of Trypanosoma cruzi-infected adult patients in a country of nonendemicity. METHODS: This observational study included all consecutive adults patients who were given a diagnosis of T. cruzi infection from June through December 2008. Eligible patients received nifurtimox at 10 mg/kg/day for 60 days, with regular medical and biological follow-up. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients received nifurtimox. Eight were lost to follow-up during treatment, and 41 (56.2%) completed the 60-day course. All premature treatment terminations were caused by AEs; 97.5% of patients suffered from AEs, mostly expected (90.5%) and not severe. Gastrointestinal symptoms predominated. Six (7.4%) patients presented with a suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction: drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (n = 3), Quincke edema (n = 1), acute myocarditis (n = 1), and anaphylaxis (n = 1). Patients with 3 or more AEs had an increased risk of premature treatment termination (hazard ratio, 8.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-45.5). CONCLUSION: Nifurtimox is poorly tolerated among adults with chronic Chagas disease, resulting in a low treatment completion rate. Considering the significant risk of serious AEs, close monitoring is required, which may be difficult to implement in poor rural areas of countries of endemicity. The safety and efficacy of nifurtimox and benznidazole should be compared to improve current therapeutic recommendations, and pharmacovigilance systems should be enhanced.
BACKGROUND:Nifurtimox has been used to treat Chagas disease for 40 years, but tolerance and safety data in adults are scarce. We aimed to evaluate nifurtimox tolerance and safety in a cohort of Trypanosoma cruzi-infected adultpatients in a country of nonendemicity. METHODS: This observational study included all consecutive adults patients who were given a diagnosis of T. cruzi infection from June through December 2008. Eligible patients received nifurtimox at 10 mg/kg/day for 60 days, with regular medical and biological follow-up. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients received nifurtimox. Eight were lost to follow-up during treatment, and 41 (56.2%) completed the 60-day course. All premature treatment terminations were caused by AEs; 97.5% of patients suffered from AEs, mostly expected (90.5%) and not severe. Gastrointestinal symptoms predominated. Six (7.4%) patients presented with a suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction: drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (n = 3), Quincke edema (n = 1), acute myocarditis (n = 1), and anaphylaxis (n = 1). Patients with 3 or more AEs had an increased risk of premature treatment termination (hazard ratio, 8.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-45.5). CONCLUSION:Nifurtimox is poorly tolerated among adults with chronic Chagas disease, resulting in a low treatment completion rate. Considering the significant risk of serious AEs, close monitoring is required, which may be difficult to implement in poor rural areas of countries of endemicity. The safety and efficacy of nifurtimox and benznidazole should be compared to improve current therapeutic recommendations, and pharmacovigilance systems should be enhanced.
Authors: Kathryn Jones; Leroy Versteeg; Ashish Damania; Brian Keegan; April Kendricks; Jeroen Pollet; Julio Vladimir Cruz-Chan; Fabian Gusovsky; Peter J Hotez; Maria Elena Bottazzi Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Nuria Cortes-Serra; Maria-Jesus Pinazo; Leonardo de la Torre; Melina Galizzi; Joaquim Gascon; Juan Manuel Bustamante Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: A J Berenstein; N Falk; G Moscatelli; S Moroni; N González; F Garcia-Bournissen; G Ballering; H Freilij; J Altcheh Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Christopher S Eickhoff; Daniel Van Aartsen; Frances E Terry; Sheba K Meymandi; Mahmoud M Traina; Salvador Hernandez; William D Martin; Leonard Moise; Annie S De Groot; Daniel F Hoft Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Bruce Y Lee; Kristina M Bacon; Angela R Wateska; Maria Elena Bottazzi; Eric Dumonteil; Peter J Hotez Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2012-08-16 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Swapna Varghese; Raphaël Rahmani; Stephanie Russell; Girdhar Singh Deora; Lori Ferrins; Arthur Toynton; Amy Jones; Melissa Sykes; Albane Kessler; Amanda Eufrásio; Artur Torres Cordeiro; Julian Sherman; Ana Rodriguez; Vicky M Avery; Matthew J Piggott; Jonathan B Baell Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2019-09-09 Impact factor: 4.345