Literature DB >> 20931180

Effects of instructed focus and task difficulty on concurrent walking and cognitive task performance in healthy young adults.

Valerie E Kelly1, Alexis A Janke, Anne Shumway-Cook.   

Abstract

Dual task paradigms can be used to examine the interactions between cognition and the control of posture and gait. Measuring and interpreting changes in dual task performance is challenging, however, because many factors can influence performance. This study examined the effects of instructed focus and walking task difficulty, and the interaction between these factors, on dual task performance in healthy young adults. Fifteen participants performed a cognitive task while walking with either a usual base or a narrow base of support. Participants were instructed to focus on either the cognitive task or walking. Trade-offs both within and between tasks were assessed using the modified attention allocation index and the performance operating characteristic. Instructed focus influenced both the cognitive task and walking. Performance on the cognitive task was faster with instructions to focus on the cognitive task, and walking was faster (and more accurate in the narrow-base condition) with instructions to focus on walking. Walking task difficulty did not affect cognitive performance but did affect walking, with faster walking in the usual-base versus narrow-base condition. There was evidence of an interaction, with greater effects of instructed focus on the cognitive task during usual versus narrow-base walking. These results support the idea that the ability to flexibly shift attention allocation and task performance in response to instructions depends on the difficulty of the postural control task. The modified attention allocation index and the performance operating characteristic were instrumental in fully characterizing trade-offs between and within tasks in order to understand dual task performance changes. A clearer understanding of the factors that affect dual task walking and the interactions between these factors has important implications for the assessment of dual task performance in both clinical and research settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20931180      PMCID: PMC3058115          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2429-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  22 in total

1.  Attentional demands and postural recovery: the effects of aging.

Authors:  L A Brown; A Shumway-Cook; M H Woollacott
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  Dual-tasking postural control: aging and the effects of cognitive demand in conjunction with focus of attention.

Authors:  Oliver Huxhold; Shu-Chen Li; Florian Schmiedek; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Attentional demands of postural control: the ability to selectively allocate information-processing resources.

Authors:  Ka-Chun Siu; Marjorie H Woollacott
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Increased gait unsteadiness in community-dwelling elderly fallers.

Authors:  J M Hausdorff; H K Edelberg; S L Mitchell; A L Goldberger; J Y Wei
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  The attention operating characteristic: examples from visual search.

Authors:  G Sperling; M J Melchner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-10-20       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The allocation of attention during locomotion is altered by anxiety.

Authors:  William H Gage; Ryan J Sleik; Melody A Polych; Nicole C McKenzie; Lesley A Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Adaptive task prioritization in aging: selective resource allocation to postural control is preserved in Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Michael A Rapp; Ralf Th Krampe; Paul B Baltes
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.105

8.  Age-dependent differences in the attentional demands of obstacle negotiation.

Authors:  Lesley A Brown; Nicole C McKenzie; Jon B Doan
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.053

9.  Does inability to allocate attention contribute to balance constraints during gait in older adults?

Authors:  Ka-Chun Siu; Li-Shan Chou; Ulrich Mayr; Paul van Donkelaar; Marjorie H Woollacott
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.053

10.  Too much or too little step width variability is associated with a fall history in older persons who walk at or near normal gait speed.

Authors:  Jennifer S Brach; Jaime E Berlin; Jessie M VanSwearingen; Anne B Newman; Stephanie A Studenski
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2005-07-26       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  60 in total

1.  Probing attention prioritization during dual-task step initiation: a novel method.

Authors:  Ruopeng Sun; John B Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Gray matter volume and dual-task gait performance in mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Takehiko Doi; Helena M Blumen; Joe Verghese; Hiroyuki Shimada; Hyuma Makizako; Kota Tsutsumimoto; Ryo Hotta; Sho Nakakubo; Takao Suzuki
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.978

3.  Attentional focus influences postural control and reaction time performances only during challenging dual-task conditions in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Anthony Remaud; Sébastien Boyas; Yves Lajoie; Martin Bilodeau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Longitudinal Assessment of Balance and Gait After Concussion and Return to Play in Collegiate Athletes.

Authors:  Lucy Parrington; Peter C Fino; Clayton W Swanson; Charles F Murchison; James Chesnutt; Laurie A King
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Allocation of attention and dual-task effects on upper and lower limb task performance in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Tara L McIsaac; Benjapol Benjapalakorn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on task processing and prioritisation during dual-task gait.

Authors:  James G Wrightson; Rosie Twomey; Emma Z Ross; Nicholas J Smeeton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Walking in high-risk settings: do older adults still prioritize gait when distracted by a cognitive task?

Authors:  Sabine Schaefer; Michael Schellenbach; Ulman Lindenberger; Marjorie Woollacott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Cognitive load reduces the effects of optic flow on gait and electrocortical dynamics during treadmill walking.

Authors:  Brenda R Malcolm; John J Foxe; John S Butler; Sophie Molholm; Pierfilippo De Sanctis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Characterization of cognitive and motor performance during dual-tasking in healthy older adults and patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Lucia Bartmann Wild; Daiane Borba de Lima; Joana Bisol Balardin; Luana Rizzi; Bruno Lima Giacobbo; Henrique Bianchi Oliveira; Irani Iracema de Lima Argimon; Leonardo Alexandre Peyré-Tartaruga; Carlos R M Rieder; Elke Bromberg
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Do perturbation-evoked responses result in higher reaction time costs depending on the direction and magnitude of perturbation?

Authors:  Keaton A Inkol; Andrew H Huntley; Lori Ann Vallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.