Literature DB >> 20930991

Maxillomandibular impalement due to a gardening hoe strike to the face.

Elio Hitoshi Shinohara1, Shajadi Carlos Pardo-Kaba, Marcelo Zillo Martini, Carlos Henrique Hueb.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20930991      PMCID: PMC2938511          DOI: 10.4103/0974-2700.66561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock        ISSN: 0974-2700


× No keyword cloud information.
Penetrating wounds of the face occur less frequently than in other regions of the body due to protective reflexes.[1] Facial impalement reports are mainly described due to the bizarre and atypical nature of the wounds because treatment protocols and surgical maneuvers employed are the same as usual. According to Eppley (2002),[2] these impalement injuries describe unusual objects and circumstances in which a body part is either partially embedded (one end sticking out) or transected (through-and-through) by a foreign material. These instruments or materials in their typical application have remote possibilities of causing such types of injuries. Wounds involving these kinds of instruments occur most commonly in the trunk and members, due to the larger exposed area, and are rarely seen in facial injuries. Facial impalement injuries caused by knives,[1] fan blade,[3] and even a model aircraft[4] are already described in the literature, but facial impalement injuries caused by being hit with a gardening hoe have not been described. Our patient was a 9-year-old white girl who presented to our Emergency Department with a severe facial wound caused by an accidental strike with a gardening hoe handled by her grandmother while trying to protect her from a dog attack. The vital signs, airway, breathing, and circulation parameters were all within normal limits. The facial trauma was focused on the lower third of the face and a detailed examination revealed a cut, bruised wound in the left-sided zygomatic body, extending in the posteroanterior direction and reaching the left mandibular base [Figure 1], with an open fracture of the left mandibular body and a fracture fissure in the left side of the posterior maxilla. Radiographic examination did not contribute to surgical planning as the child was constantly moving her head during radiographic examination. Because of the superficial nature of the wounds and the good visual access to the open fracture, we chose not to repeat the radiograph exam. The patient underwent emergency surgery for reduction and fixation of the mandibular fracture. The mandibular fracture was reduced and stabilized with two titanium 2.0-mm miniplates and monocortical screws (Medicon© Tuttlingen-Germany) [Figure 2]. The patient was put on antibiotics and her tetanus vaccine status was updated. The patient was discharged after 72 h, and 7 months later her dental occlusion remained normal, and the only sequel she presented with was a deficiency in facial motricity caused by cicatricial retraction and traumatic lesion of the facial nerve [Figure 3a and b].
Figure 1

Open wound in the left zygomatic region extending in the posteroanterior direction and reaching the left mandibular base

Figure 2

Mandibular fracture stability was achieved with two titanium miniplates and 2.0-mm screws

Figure 3

Clinical (a) and radiographic (b) aspects after 7 months

Open wound in the left zygomatic region extending in the posteroanterior direction and reaching the left mandibular base Mandibular fracture stability was achieved with two titanium miniplates and 2.0-mm screws Clinical (a) and radiographic (b) aspects after 7 months
  4 in total

Review 1.  Unusual maxillofacial injury caused by a model airplane.

Authors:  A Aldegheri; P Adam; P Huet
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Impacted knife injuries in the maxillofacial region: report of 2 cases.

Authors:  E H Shinohara; L Heringer; J P de Carvalho
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Fan blade injury to the maxillofacial region: a case report.

Authors:  A W Sedhom; R D Leathers; M J Belton; G Ghobrial
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Craniofacial impalement injury: a rake in the face.

Authors:  Barry L Eppley
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.046

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.