Literature DB >> 20930128

Increased training loads do not magnify cancellous bone gains with rodent jump resistance exercise.

J M Swift1, H G Gasier, S N Swift, M P Wiggs, H A Hogan, J D Fluckey, S A Bloomfield.   

Abstract

This study sought to elucidate the effects of a low- and high-load jump resistance exercise (RE) training protocol on cancellous bone of the proximal tibia metaphysis (PTM) and femoral neck (FN). Sprague-Dawley rats (male, 6 mo old) were randomly assigned to high-load RE (HRE; n = 16), low-load RE (LRE; n = 15), or sedentary cage control (CC; n = 11) groups. Animals in the HRE and LRE groups performed 15 sessions of jump RE during 5 wk of training. PTM cancellous volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), assessed by in vivo peripheral quantitative computed tomography scans, significantly increased in both exercise groups (+9%; P < 0.001), resulting in part from 130% (HRE; P = 0.003) and 213% (LRE; P < 0.0001) greater bone formation (measured by standard histomorphometry) vs. CC. Additionally, mineralizing surface (%MS/BS) and mineral apposition rate were higher (50-90%) in HRE and LRE animals compared with controls. PTM bone microarchitecture was enhanced with LRE, resulting in greater trabecular thickness (P = 0.03) and bone volume fraction (BV/TV; P = 0.04) vs. CC. Resorption surface was reduced by nearly 50% in both exercise paradigms. Increased PTM bone mass in the LRE group translated into a 161% greater elastic modulus (P = 0.04) vs. CC. LRE and HRE increased FN vBMD (10%; P < 0.0001) and bone mineral content (∼ 20%; P < 0.0001) and resulted in significantly greater FN strength vs. CC. For the vast majority of variables, there was no difference in the cancellous bone response between the two exercise groups, although LRE resulted in significantly greater body mass accrual and bone formation response. These results suggest that jumping at minimal resistance provides a similar anabolic stimulus to cancellous bone as jumping at loads exceeding body mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20930128     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00596.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  5 in total

1.  Increased resistance during jump exercise does not enhance cortical bone formation.

Authors:  Ramon D Boudreaux; Joshua M Swift; Heath G Gasier; Michael P Wiggs; Harry A Hogan; James D Fluckey; Susan A Bloomfield
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 2.  Exercise and Diet: Uncovering Prospective Mediators of Skeletal Fragility in Bone and Marrow Adipose Tissue.

Authors:  Sarah E Little-Letsinger; Gabriel M Pagnotti; Cody McGrath; Maya Styner
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Effects of different types of jump impact on trabecular bone mass and microarchitecture in growing rats.

Authors:  Yong-In Ju; Teruki Sone; Kazuhiro Ohnaru; Kensuke Tanaka; Hidetaka Yamaguchi; Masao Fukunaga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Biomechanical and tomographic differences in the microarchitecture and strength of trabecular and cortical bone in the early stage of male osteoporosis.

Authors:  Poh-Shiow Yeh; Yuan-Wen Lee; Wei-Hui Chang; Weu Wang; Jaw-Lin Wang; Shing-Hwa Liu; Ruei-Ming Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effects of Different Types of Mechanical Loading on Trabecular Bone Microarchitecture in Rats.

Authors:  Yong-In Ju; Teruki Sone
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2021-11-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.