Literature DB >> 20929974

Smelling chemosensory signals of males in anxious versus nonanxious condition increases state anxiety of female subjects.

Jessica Albrecht1, Maria Demmel, Veronika Schöpf, Anna Maria Kleemann, Rainer Kopietz, Johanna May, Tatjana Schreder, Rebekka Zernecke, Hartmut Brückmann, Martin Wiesmann.   

Abstract

The hypothesis of this experiment was that humans in an anxious state compared with a nonanxious state are able to increase anxiety levels in other humans via their body odors. Specifically, we hypothesized that male chemosensory anxiety signals compared with neutral chemosignals increase state anxiety of female subjects. Thirteen male subjects participated in 2 different sweat donation sessions: chemosignals were collected during participation in a high rope course (anxiety condition) and in an ergometer workout (neutral condition). State and trait anxiety were evaluated in 20 female odor recipients using Spielberger's state-trait anxiety inventory in a double-blind design. Comparison of state anxiety of odor donors between control and anxiety condition differed significantly indicating that our model of anxiety induction successfully led to the expected change in emotion. Comparison of state anxiety of odor recipients showed a trend toward higher state anxiety in the anxiety condition compared with the neutral condition after 5 min of odor exposure. After 20 min of odor exposure, state anxiety of female subjects was significantly higher during the perception of sweat collected during the anxiety condition in comparison with the perception of sweat collected during the neutral condition. This experiment gives evidence that male anxiety chemosignals compared with neutral chemosignals are capable of inducing an increased state anxiety in female subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20929974     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjq087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  23 in total

1.  Adrenarche and middle childhood.

Authors:  Benjamin C Campbell
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2011-09

2.  Consequences of undetected olfactory loss for human chemosensory communication and well-being.

Authors:  A Oleszkiewicz; F Kunkel; M Larsson; T Hummel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Decoding the social volatilome by tracking rapid context-dependent odour change.

Authors:  S Craig Roberts; Pawel K Misztal; Ben Langford
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Losing stinks! The effect of competition outcome on body odour quality.

Authors:  Jitka Fialová; Vít Třebický; Radim Kuba; David Stella; Jakub Binter; Jan Havlíček
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Identification of a pheromone that increases anxiety in rats.

Authors:  Hideaki Inagaki; Yasushi Kiyokawa; Shigeyuki Tamogami; Hidenori Watanabe; Yukari Takeuchi; Yuji Mori
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Gender effects and sexual-orientation impact on androstadienone-evoked behavior and neural processing.

Authors:  Jacqueline Krajnik; Kathrin Kollndorfer; Karl-Heinz Nenning; Johan N Lundström; Veronika Schöpf
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Rapid stress system drives chemical transfer of fear from sender to receiver.

Authors:  Jasper H B de Groot; Monique A M Smeets; Gün R Semin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Assessing Personality Using Body Odor: Differences Between Children and Adults.

Authors:  Agnieszka Sorokowska
Journal:  J Nonverbal Behav       Date:  2013-09

9.  Human gender differences in the perception of conspecific alarm chemosensory cues.

Authors:  Anca R Radulescu; Lilianne R Mujica-Parodi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Chemosignals of stress influence social judgments.

Authors:  Pamela Dalton; Christopher Mauté; Cristina Jaén; Tamika Wilson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.