Literature DB >> 20929930

The outcomes of palliative care day services: a systematic review.

Elaine Stevens1, Colin R Martin, Craig A White.   

Abstract

This systematic review evaluates the evidence underpinning the provision of palliative day care services (PDS) to determine whether such services have a measurable effect on attendees' wellbeing. The majority of studies reviewed were qualitative and elicited individual perceptions of the benefits PDS. Although it was difficult to determine the quality of many studies, it would appear that attendance at PDS had a positive impact on attendees' quality of life. Fewer studies utilized validated outcome measures to determine the effect of PDS on attendees' wellbeing and small sample sizes combined with high attrition rates influenced the significance of some the results. However little quantitative evidence was offered to prove that PDS had an impact on attendees' quality of life or wellbeing. The review concludes that dying people find attending PDS a valuable experience that allows them to engage with others and to be supported in a restorative environment. However, further well-powered empirical studies are required to provide quality evidence to determine whether or not attendance at PDS does indeed have a positive impact on the wellbeing of attendees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20929930     DOI: 10.1177/0269216310381796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  7 in total

Review 1.  Elements of effective palliative care models: a rapid review.

Authors:  Tim Luckett; Jane Phillips; Meera Agar; Claudia Virdun; Anna Green; Patricia M Davidson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Quality of life assessment in advanced cancer patients treated at home, an inpatient unit, and a day care center.

Authors:  Wojciech Leppert; Mikolaj Majkowicz; Maria Forycka; Eleonora Mess; Agata Zdun-Ryzewska
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Patients' perceptions of palliative care quality in hospice inpatient care, hospice day care, palliative units in nursing homes, and home care: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Tuva Sandsdalen; Vigdis Abrahamsen Grøndahl; Reidun Hov; Sevald Høye; Ingrid Rystedt; Bodil Wilde-Larsson
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.234

4.  Improving the quality of life of palliative and chronic disease patients and carers in remote Australia with the establishment of a day respite facility.

Authors:  Timothy A Carey; Kellie Schouten; John Wakerman; John S Humphreys; Fred Miegel; Simon Murphy; Mick Arundell
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.234

Review 5.  Effectiveness of palliative care interventions offering social support to people with life-limiting illness-A systematic review.

Authors:  N Bradley; M Lloyd-Williams; C Dowrick
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 2.520

6.  Challenges for palliative care day services: a focus group study.

Authors:  Felicity Hasson; Joanne Jordan; Laurie McKibben; Lisa Graham-Wisener; Anne Finucane; Kathy Armour; Shazia Zafar; Alistair Hewison; Kevin Brazil; W George Kernohan
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.234

7.  Exploring the costs, consequences and efficiency of three types of palliative care day services in the UK: a pragmatic before-and-after descriptive cohort study.

Authors:  Paul Mark Mitchell; Joanna Coast; Gareth Myring; Federico Ricciardi; Victoria Vickerstaff; Louise Jones; Shazia Zafar; Sarah Cudmore; Joanne Jordan; Laurie McKibben; Lisa Graham-Wisener; Anne M Finucane; Alistair Hewison; Erna Haraldsdottir; Kevin Brazil; W George Kernohan
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.234

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.