BACKGROUND: In many hospitals a routine chest X-ray is performed on admission. There are, however, scant data regarding its usefulness in contemporary patient populations. METHODS: We studied consecutive patients admitted during a 2 month period to a single department of medicine, where hospital policy mandates performing an admission CXR. Two senior clinicians not involved in the care of these patients assessed the discharge summaries for a clinical indication to perform CXR on admission, as well as its contribution to patient management (major positive, major negative, minor positive, or no contribution). RESULTS: There were 675 patients whose mean age was 64.5 +/- 17.2 years. In 19.6% (130 cases) CXR was not performed. Of the 545 CXRs done, 260 (48%) were normal. In only 128 (23.5%) did the admission CXR make a major positive contribution to diagnosis or treatment. In 61 (11.2%) it provided a minor positive contribution and in 153 (28.1%) a major negative contribution. In 184 patients (33.8%) the CXR did not affect either diagnosis or management. It made a major positive contribution to management in patients for whom there was an indication for performing the X-ray (odds ratio 10.3, P < 0.0005) and in those with a relevant finding on physical examination (OR 1.63, P = 0.110). For the 329 patients who had neither a clinical indication for performing a CXR nor an abnormal chest examination the admission CXR contributed to patient management in only 12 cases (3.6%). CONCLUSIONS: A routine admission CXR has a significant impact on patient management only in those patients in whom there are relevant findings on physical examination or a clear clinical indication for performing the test. There is no need to routinely order CXR on admission to hospital.
BACKGROUND: In many hospitals a routine chest X-ray is performed on admission. There are, however, scant data regarding its usefulness in contemporary patient populations. METHODS: We studied consecutive patients admitted during a 2 month period to a single department of medicine, where hospital policy mandates performing an admission CXR. Two senior clinicians not involved in the care of these patients assessed the discharge summaries for a clinical indication to perform CXR on admission, as well as its contribution to patient management (major positive, major negative, minor positive, or no contribution). RESULTS: There were 675 patients whose mean age was 64.5 +/- 17.2 years. In 19.6% (130 cases) CXR was not performed. Of the 545 CXRs done, 260 (48%) were normal. In only 128 (23.5%) did the admission CXR make a major positive contribution to diagnosis or treatment. In 61 (11.2%) it provided a minor positive contribution and in 153 (28.1%) a major negative contribution. In 184 patients (33.8%) the CXR did not affect either diagnosis or management. It made a major positive contribution to management in patients for whom there was an indication for performing the X-ray (odds ratio 10.3, P < 0.0005) and in those with a relevant finding on physical examination (OR 1.63, P = 0.110). For the 329 patients who had neither a clinical indication for performing a CXR nor an abnormal chest examination the admission CXR contributed to patient management in only 12 cases (3.6%). CONCLUSIONS: A routine admission CXR has a significant impact on patient management only in those patients in whom there are relevant findings on physical examination or a clear clinical indication for performing the test. There is no need to routinely order CXR on admission to hospital.