Literature DB >> 20927618

Diethylene glycol in health products sold over-the-counter and imported from Asian countries.

Joshua G Schier1, Dana B Barr, Zheng Li, Amy F Wolkin, Samuel E Baker, Lauren S Lewis, Michael A McGeehin.   

Abstract

Diethylene glycol (DEG), a chemical that has been implicated in multiple medication-associated mass poisonings, can result in renal and neurological toxicity if ingested. Three previous such mass poisonings implicated Chinese manufacturers as the origin of contaminated ingredients. No literature exists on potential DEG or triethylene glycol (TEG), a related compound, contamination of health products imported from Asian countries to the USA. Our primary objective was to quantitatively assess the amount of DEG present in a convenience sampling of these health products. The study's secondary objectives were to: (1) evaluate for, and quantify TEG levels in these samples; (2) compare DEG and TEG levels in these products directly to levels in medications implicated in previous similar mass poisonings; and (3) to estimate DEG dose (in mg/kg) based on the manufacturer's instructions and compare these values to toxic doses from past mass poisonings and the literature. A quantitative assessment of DEG and TEG was performed in a convenience sampling of over-the-counter health products imported from Asian countries. Results were converted to volume to volume (v/v) % and compared with DEG levels in medications implicated in previous mass poisonings. Estimated doses (based on the manufacturer's instructions) of each product with detectable levels of DEG for a 70 kg adult were compared to toxic doses of DEG reported in the literature. Seventeen of 85 (20%) samples were not able to be analyzed for DEG or TEG due to technical reasons. Fifteen of 68 (22%) samples successfully tested had detectable levels of DEG (mean, 18.8 μg/ml; range, 0.791-110.1 μg/ml; and volume to volume (v/v) range, 0.00007-0.01%). Two of 68 (3%) samples had TEG levels of 12.8 and 20.2 μg/ml or 0.0012% and 0.0018% TEG v/v. The product with the highest DEG% by v/v was 810 times less than the product involved in the Panama DEG mass poisoning (8.1%). The lowest reported toxic dose from a past DEG mass poisoning (14 mg/kg) was more than 150 times higher than the highest daily dose estimated in our study (0.09 mg/kg). Sixty-eight of 85 (80%) samples were able to be successfully analyzed for DEG and TEG. DEG and TEG were detectable in 15/68 (22%) and 2/68 (3%) samples, respectively. Based on current standards, these levels probably do not represent an acute public health threat. Additional research focusing on why DEG is found in these products and on the minimum amount of DEG needed to result in toxicity is needed. © American College of Medical Toxicology 2010

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20927618      PMCID: PMC3614107          DOI: 10.1007/s13181-010-0111-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Toxicol        ISSN: 1556-9039


  12 in total

1.  Comments on diethylene glycol concentrations.

Authors:  L J Schep; R J Slaughter
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Acute intoxication due to topical application of diethylene glycol.

Authors:  M C Cantarell; J Fort; J Camps; M Sans; L Piera
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Triethylene glycol poisoning treated with intravenous ethanol infusion.

Authors:  J Vassiliadis; A Graudins; R P Dowsett
Journal:  J Toxicol Clin Toxicol       Date:  1999

4.  Intravenous 4-methylpyrazole as an antidote for diethylene glycol and triethylene glycol poisoning: a case report.

Authors:  S W Borron; F J Baud; R Garnier
Journal:  Vet Hum Toxicol       Date:  1997-02

Review 5.  Triethylene glycol HO(CH2CH2O)3H.

Authors:  Bryan Ballantyne; William M Snellings
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.446

Review 6.  Medication-associated diethylene glycol mass poisoning: a review and discussion on the origin of contamination.

Authors:  Joshua G Schier; Carol S Rubin; Dorothy Miller; Dana Barr; Michael A McGeehin
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.222

7.  [Pathologic findings in diethylene glycol poisoning].

Authors:  R Drut; G Quijano; M C Jones; P Scanferla
Journal:  Medicina (B Aires)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 0.653

8.  Venous diethylene glycol poisoning in patients with preexisting severe liver disease in China.

Authors:  Bing-Liang Lin; Zhi-Xin Zhao; Yu-Tian Chong; Jian-Guo Li; Xing Zuo; Yu Tao; Tan-Qi Lou; Zhi-Liang Gao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Outbreak of acute renal failure in Panama in 2006: a case-control study.

Authors:  E Danielle Rentz; Lauren Lewis; Oscar J Mujica; Dana B Barr; Joshua G Schier; Gayanga Weerasekera; Peter Kuklenyik; Michael McGeehin; John Osterloh; Jacob Wamsley; Washington Lum; Camilo Alleyne; Nestor Sosa; Jorge Motta; Carol Rubin
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 10.  Diethylene glycol poisoning.

Authors:  Leo J Schep; Robin J Slaughter; Wayne A Temple; D Michael G Beasley
Journal:  Clin Toxicol (Phila)       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.467

View more
  2 in total

1.  Diethylene glycol-induced toxicities show marked threshold dose response in rats.

Authors:  Greg M Landry; Cody L Dunning; Fleurette Abreo; Brian Latimer; Elysse Orchard; Kenneth E McMartin
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  Characterizing concentrations of diethylene glycol and suspected metabolites in human serum, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid samples from the Panama DEG mass poisoning.

Authors:  J G Schier; D R Hunt; A Perala; K E McMartin; M J Bartels; L S Lewis; M A McGeehin; W D Flanders
Journal:  Clin Toxicol (Phila)       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 4.467

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.