Literature DB >> 20927112

Effects of valsartan and amlodipine on cardiorenal protection in Japanese hypertensive patients: the Valsartan Amlodipine Randomized Trial.

Hiroya Narumi1, Hiroyuki Takano, Satoshi Shindo, Miwa Fujita, Hiroshi Mizuma, Yoichi Kuwabara, Issei Komuro.   

Abstract

The Valsartan Amlodipine Randomized Trial, a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-labeled, blinded-end point trial, was designed to compare the beneficial effects of the angiotensin II receptor blocker valsartan and the calcium channel blocker amlodipine on cardiovascular events in Japanese essential hypertensive patients. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause death, sudden death, cerebrovascular death, cardiac events, vascular events and renal events. The secondary endpoints were effects on left ventricular hypertrophy, cardiac sympathetic nerve activity and renal function. A total of 1021 patients were enrolled in the present trial. The mean follow-up period was 3.4 years. There were no significant differences in blood pressure (BP) levels between the valsartan group and the amlodipine group throughout the trial. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint between the two groups (hazard ratio: 1.0, P = 0.843). No difference in any event category of the primary endpoint was noted for either group. However, we observed a significant reduction of left ventricular mass index, as determined by echocardiography, in the valsartan group compared with the amlodipine group. We also observed a significant decrease in cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in the valsartan group but not in the amlodipine group. Moreover, there was a significant reduction in the urinary albumin to creatinine ratio in the valsartan group but not in the amlodipine group. Therefore, although BP levels were well controlled and remained equal in the two groups, valsartan had more protective effects on the heart and kidney than amlodipine in Japanese hypertensive patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20927112     DOI: 10.1038/hr.2010.186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Res        ISSN: 0916-9636            Impact factor:   3.872


  6 in total

Review 1.  Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension.

Authors:  Jiaying Zhu; Ning Chen; Muke Zhou; Jian Guo; Cairong Zhu; Jie Zhou; Mengmeng Ma; Li He
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-01-09

Review 2.  Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension.

Authors:  Jiaying Zhu; Ning Chen; Muke Zhou; Jian Guo; Cairong Zhu; Jie Zhou; Mengmeng Ma; Li He
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-17

Review 3.  The central mechanism underlying hypertension: a review of the roles of sodium ions, epithelial sodium channels, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, oxidative stress and endogenous digitalis in the brain.

Authors:  Hakuo Takahashi; Masamichi Yoshika; Yutaka Komiyama; Masato Nishimura
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.872

4.  Addition of a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor to a calcium channel blocker ameliorates arterial stiffness.

Authors:  Shunsuke Kiuchi; Shinji Hisatake; Muneyasu Kawasaki; Osamu Hirashima; Takayuki Kabuki; Junichi Yamazaki; Takanori Ikeda
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-10-08

5.  Calcium channel blocker compared with angiotensin receptor blocker for patients with hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ling Wu; Song-Bai Deng; Qiang She
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Doping Doctors: The Influence of the Marketing Departments of Pharmaceutical Companies on Physician and Researcher Behavior in Japan.

Authors:  Iekuni Ichikawa; Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.