Literature DB >> 20926845

The contribution of health technology assessment, health needs assessment, and health impact assessment to the assessment and translation of technologies in the field of public health genomics.

N Rosenkötter1, H Vondeling, I Blancquaert, O C L Mekel, F B Kristensen, A Brand.   

Abstract

The European Union has named genomics as one of the promising research fields for the development of new health technologies. Major concerns with regard to these fields are, on the one hand, the rather slow and limited translation of new knowledge and, on the other hand, missing insights into the impact on public health and health care practice of those technologies that are actually introduced. This paper aims to give an overview of the major assessment instruments in public health [health technology assessment (HTA), health needs assessment (HNA) and health impact assessment (HIA)] which could contribute to the systematic translation and assessment of genomic health applications by focussing at population level and on public health policy making. It is shown to what extent HTA, HNA and HIA contribute to translational research by using the continuum of translational research (T1-T4) in genomic medicine as an analytic framework. The selected assessment methodologies predominantly cover 2 to 4 phases within the T1-T4 system. HTA delivers the most complete set of methodologies when assessing health applications. HNA can be used to prioritize areas where genomic health applications are needed or to identify infrastructural needs. HIA delivers information on the impact of technologies in a wider scope and promotes informed decision making. HTA, HNA and HIA provide a partly overlapping and partly unique set of methodologies and infrastructure for the translation and assessment of genomic health applications. They are broad in scope and go beyond the continuum of T1-T4 translational research regarding policy translation.
Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20926845     DOI: 10.1159/000318317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  9 in total

1.  Public health and valorization of genome-based technologies: a new model.

Authors:  Jonathan A Lal; Tobias Schulte In den Bäumen; Servaas A Morré; Angela Brand
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 5.531

2.  Increasing participation in genomic research and biobanking through community-based capacity building.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gross Cohn; Maryam Husamudeen; Elaine L Larson; Janet K Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Mapping the evolving definitions of translational research.

Authors:  Daniel G Fort; Timothy M Herr; Pamela L Shaw; Karen E Gutzman; Justin B Starren
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2017-02-02

4.  Evaluating diagnostic strategies for early detection of cancer: the CanTest framework.

Authors:  Fiona M Walter; Matthew J Thompson; Ian Wellwood; Gary A Abel; William Hamilton; Margaret Johnson; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; Michael P Messenger; Richard D Neal; Greg Rubin; Hardeep Singh; Anne Spencer; Stephen Sutton; Peter Vedsted; Jon D Emery
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Public health in the genomic era: will Public Health Genomics contribute to major changes in the prevention of common diseases?

Authors:  Evy Cleeren; Johan Van der Heyden; Angela Brand; Herman Van Oyen
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2011-12-05

Review 6.  Values in translation: how asking the right questions can move translational science toward greater health impact.

Authors:  Maureen Kelley; Kelly Edwards; Helene Starks; Stephanie M Fullerton; Rosalina James; Sara Goering; Suzanne Holland; Mary L Disis; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 4.689

7.  Evaluating genomic tests from bench to bedside: a practical framework.

Authors:  Jennifer S Lin; Matthew Thompson; Katrina A B Goddard; Margaret A Piper; Carl Heneghan; Evelyn P Whitlock
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  The cost-effectiveness of the Argus II retinal prosthesis in Retinitis Pigmentosa patients.

Authors:  Anil Vaidya; Elio Borgonovi; Rod S Taylor; José-Alain Sahel; Stanislao Rizzo; Paulo Eduardo Stanga; Amit Kukreja; Peter Walter
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  Emerging Therapeutic Enhancement Enabling Health Technologies and Their Discourses: What Is Discussed within the Health Domain?

Authors:  Gregor Wolbring; Lucy Diep; Sophya Yumakulov; Natalie Ball; Verlyn Leopatra; Dean Yergens
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2013-07-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.