Literature DB >> 20926329

Patient tolerance of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in the presence of orthopaedic implants.

Barry J Broderick1, Cian Kennedy, Paul P Breen, Stephen R Kearns, Gearóid ÓLaighin.   

Abstract

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) may help reduce the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the postoperative total hip and knee arthroplasty patient. However, discomfort associated with stimulus may reduce patient acceptance of NMES as therapy. The aim of this study was to determine if patient comfort and tolerance of NMES was affected by applying stimulation in proximity to an orthopaedic implant. There was a concern that this may cause a concentration of current around the metal which could result in hypersensitivity of NMES and reduce its effectiveness. Twenty patients took part in this study, 10 total hip and 10 total knee arthroplasty patients. Each patient was at least 3 weeks post surgery. NMES was applied to the calf muscles of each leg using skin surface electrodes. Four excitatory levels were recorded, which were: sensory threshold, motor threshold, pain threshold and pain tolerance. Following this, patients underwent a 5 min stimulation session and indicated their overall comfort level on a visual analogue scale. Measurements of peak venous velocity, mean velocity and volume flow were recorded by duplex scanning from the popliteal vein at rest and in response to NMES elicited contractions during this session. Finally, patients completed a short verbal interview detailing their experience with the NMES treatment. The blood flow results showed increases in peak venous velocities, mean velocities and volume flow produced by NMES of 200%, 60% and 60% respectively when compared to resting blood flow. Comfort assessment indicated that the presence of a metallic implant did not give rise to hypersensitivity due to NMES. Patients found the application of calf muscle NMES comfortable and acceptable as a treatment. We conclude that the use of NMES on postoperative orthopaedic patients can be safely administered as a DVT prevention method.
Copyright © 2010 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20926329     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  9 in total

1.  Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation on the Submental Area: The Relations of Biopsychological Factors with Maximum Amplitude Tolerance and Perceived Discomfort Level.

Authors:  Ali Barikroo; Karen Hegland; Giselle Carnaby; Donald Bolser; Todd Manini; Michael Crary
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  The geko™ electro-stimulation device for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: a NICE medical technology guidance.

Authors:  Jennifer A Summers; James Clinch; Muralikrishnan Radhakrishnan; Andy Healy; Viktoria McMillan; Elizabeth Morris; Tiago Rua; Mercy Ofuya; Yanzhong Wang; Paul W Dimmock; Cornelius Lewis; Janet L Peacock; Stephen F Keevil
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.561

3.  Biocompatibility of Four Common Orthopedic Biomaterials Following a High-Salt Diet: An In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Mathieu Lecocq; Cécile Bernard; Marie Solenne Felix; Jean-Marc Linares; Julien Chaves-Jacob; Patrick Decherchi; Erick Dousset
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Can Direct Current Electrotherapy Be Used for Patients With Orthopedic Implants?

Authors:  Evangeline Thaler; Felippe Toledo; Holger Korte
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2017-02-15

5.  A feasibility randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel neuromuscular electro-stimulation device in preventing the formation of oedema following total hip replacement surgery.

Authors:  Thomas W Wainwright; Louise C Burgess; Robert G Middleton
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-07-18

6.  Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Enhanced Recovery After Total Hip Replacement Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  YiBo Zhao; Baifeng Zhang; Yongzhi Wang; Jingwei Liu
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2022-09-23

7.  Haemodynamic performance of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) during recovery from total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Barry J Broderick; Oisin Breathnach; Finbarr Condon; Eric Masterson; Gearóid Ólaighin
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Titanium Implant Impairment and Surrounding Muscle Cell Death Following High-Salt Diet: An In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Mathieu Lecocq; Marie-Solenne Felix; Jean-Marc Linares; Julien Chaves-Jacob; Patrick Decherchi; Erick Dousset
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Can the Use of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Be Improved to Optimize Quadriceps Strengthening?

Authors:  Neal R Glaviano; Susan Saliba
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.843

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.