Literature DB >> 20926257

PubMed had a higher sensitivity than Ovid-MEDLINE in the search for systematic reviews.

Wanruchada Katchamart1, Amy Faulkner, Brian Feldman, George Tomlinson, Claire Bombardier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of Ovid-MEDLINE vs. PubMed for identifying randomized controlled trials of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: We created search strategies for Ovid-MEDLINE and PubMed for a systematic review of MTX in RA. Their performance was evaluated using sensitivity, precision, and number needed to read (NNR).
RESULTS: Comparing searches in Ovid-MEDLINE vs. PubMed, PubMed retrieved more citations overall than Ovid-MEDLINE; however, of the 20 citations that met eligibility criteria for the review, Ovid-MEDLINE retrieved 17 and PubMed 18. The sensitivity was 85% for Ovid-MEDLINE vs. 90% for PubMed, whereas the precision and NNR were comparable (precision: 0.881% for Ovid-MEDLINE vs. 0.884% for PubMed and NNR: 114 for Ovid-MEDLINE vs. 113 for PubMed).
CONCLUSION: In systematic reviews of RA, PubMed has higher sensitivity than Ovid-MEDLINE with comparable precision and NNR. This study highlights the importance of well-designed database-specific search strategies.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20926257     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  5 in total

1.  Supplementary searches of PubMed to improve currency of MEDLINE and MEDLINE In-Process searches via Ovid.

Authors:  Steven Duffy; Shelley de Kock; Kate Misso; Caro Noake; Janine Ross; Lisa Stirk
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2016-10

Review 2.  Patient education for people with multiple sclerosis-associated fatigue: A systematic review.

Authors:  Maria Janina Wendebourg; Christoph Heesen; Marcia Finlayson; Björn Meyer; Jana Pöttgen; Sascha Köpke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Errors in search strategies used in systematic reviews and their effects on information retrieval.

Authors:  José Antonio Salvador-Oliván; Gonzalo Marco-Cuenca; Rosario Arquero-Avilés
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2019-04-01

4.  Search results outliers among MEDLINE platforms.

Authors:  Christopher Sean Burns; Robert M Shapiro; Tyler Nix; Jeffrey T Huber
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2019-07-01

Review 5.  Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies.

Authors:  Chris Cooper; Andrew Booth; Jo Varley-Campbell; Nicky Britten; Ruth Garside
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 4.615

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.