Literature DB >> 20924987

The influence of expertise and of physical complexity on visual short-term memory consolidation.

Huiming Sun1, Hubert D Zimmer, Xiaolan Fu.   

Abstract

We investigated whether the expertise of a perceiver and the physical complexity of a stimulus influence consolidation of visual short-term memory (VSTM) in a S1-S2 (Stimulus 1-Stimulus 2) change detection task. Consolidation is assumed to make transient perceptual representations in VSTM more durable, and it is investigated by postexposure of a mask shortly after offset of the perceived stimulus (S1; 17 to 483 ms). We presented colours, Chinese characters, pseudocharacters, and novel symbols to novices (Germans) or experts of Chinese language (Chinese readers). Physical complexity was manipulated by the number of strokes. Unfamiliar material was remembered worse than familiar material (Experiments 1, 2, and 3). For novices the absolute VSTM performance was better for physically simple than for complex material, whereas for experts the complexity did not matter-Chinese readers memorized Chinese characters (Experiment 3). Articulatory suppression did not change these effects (Experiment 2). We always observed a strong effect of SOA, but this effect was influenced neither by physical complexity nor by expertise; only the length of the interstimulus interval between S1 and the mask was relevant. This was observed even with short stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) of 100 ms (Experiment 2) and in comparing colours and characters (Experiment 5). However, masks impaired memory if they were presented at the locations of the to-be-memorized items, but not beside them-that is, interference was location-based (Experiment 6). We explain the effect of SOA by the assumption that it takes time to stop encoding of information presented at item locations with the offset of S1. The increasing resistance against interference by irrelevant material appears as consolidation of S1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20924987     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2010.511238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  8 in total

1.  Representations in mental imagery and working memory: evidence from different types of visual masks.

Authors:  Gregoire Borst; Giorgio Ganis; William L Thompson; Stephen M Kosslyn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

2.  Induced negative arousal modulates the speed of visual working memory consolidation.

Authors:  Weizhen Xie; Jc Lynne Lu Sing; Ana Martinez-Flores; Weiwei Zhang
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2022-01-06

3.  Face-Processing Differences Present in Grapheme-Color Synesthetes.

Authors:  Thea Mannix; Thomas Alrik Sørensen
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-04

4.  The Role of Stimulus-Specific Perceptual Fluency in Statistical Learning.

Authors:  Andrew Perfors; Evan Kidd
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-02

5.  Visual Working Memory of Chinese Characters and Expertise: The Expert's Memory Advantage Is Based on Long-Term Knowledge of Visual Word Forms.

Authors:  Hubert D Zimmer; Benjamin Fischer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-04-17

6.  Who learns more? Cultural differences in implicit sequence learning.

Authors:  Qiufang Fu; Zoltan Dienes; Junchen Shang; Xiaolan Fu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Representation of linguistic information determines its susceptibility to memory interference.

Authors:  Myra A Fernandes; Jeffrey D Wammes; Janet H Hsiao
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2013-08-08

8.  Older Adults Benefit from Symmetry, but Not Semantic Availability, in Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Colin J Hamilton; Louise A Brown; Clelia Rossi-Arnaud
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.