Literature DB >> 20924645

Epidemiology and sociodemographic aspects of ocular traumatic injuries in Iran.

Alireza Keshtkar Jafari1, Faramarz Anvari, Ahmad Ameri, Shima Bozorgui, Nooshin Shahverdi.   

Abstract

Although the incidence of ocular trauma has been clearly described in developed countries, few published data are available on the epidemiology and the effects of parameters that can influence the incidence and severity of ocular injuries in Iran. The present study tried to determine epidemiological aspects of ocular traumatic injuries and evaluate their effects on different types of ocular injury. The case series included 1950 consecutive patients with acute ophthalmic trauma presented to the emergency ward of Farabi Hospital in Tehran. Information was collected by interviewing patients and having them fill in a questionnaire. The final diagnosis was made by a medical resident. If there was a difficulty or doubt in diagnosis or classification, confirmation of diagnosis was made by senior faculty. Ocular injuries were classified into globe and non-globe injuries according to the site of injury. Mechanical globe injuries were classified according to Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology (BETT) into closed and open injuries. The mean age of patients was 28.8 ± 12.8 years; 87.6% were male. The most common causes of injury were work-related (49.0%) and chance events (42.0%). The most frequent ocular injury was globe injury (95.6%), including mechanical (77.6% closed and 5.9% open), chemical (7.6%), photic (2.3%) and thermal (2.2%) injuries. Non-globe injury also occurred in 10.8% of patients; both globe and non-globe injuries occurred in 6.5% of patients. The hospitalization rate in all patients was 8.8%. Previous history of eye trauma was significantly more common in the group with isolated globe injuries (P < 0.001). History of eye trauma is a risk factor for globe injuries and female gender is a risk factor only for non-globe injuries. These two factors may predict future eye injury and increase its risk by 5.2 and 1.6 times, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20924645     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-010-9401-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  19 in total

1.  Demographic factors in a population-based survey of hospitalized, work-related, ocular injury.

Authors:  R S Baker; M R Wilson; C W Flowers; D A Lee; N C Wheeler
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Four-year review of open eye injuries at the Royal Adelaide Hospital.

Authors:  Robert J Casson; James C Walker; Henry S Newland
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.207

3.  Epidemiology and implications of ocular trauma admitted to hospital in Scotland.

Authors:  P Desai; C J MacEwen; P Baines; D C Minassian
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Eye injuries in northern Sweden.

Authors:  E Mönestam; U Björnstig
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1991-02

5.  The epidemiology of serious eye injuries from the United States Eye Injury Registry.

Authors:  D R May; F P Kuhn; R E Morris; C D Witherspoon; R P Danis; G P Matthews; L Mann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Time trends in the incidence of hospitalized ocular trauma.

Authors:  J M Tielsch; L Parver; B Shankar
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-04

7.  The incidence of acute hospital-treated eye injuries.

Authors:  T A Karlson; B E Klein
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-10

8.  The incidence of eye injuries in New England adults.

Authors:  R J Glynn; J M Seddon; B M Berlin
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-06

9.  A review of ocular emergencies in a Taiwanese medical center.

Authors:  C C Tsai; H C Kau; S C Kao; J H Liu
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei)       Date:  1998-07

10.  Hospitalized eye injury in a large industrial city of South-Eastern Asia.

Authors:  Cheng-Hsien Chang; Chang-Ling Chen; Chi-Kung Ho; Yu-Hong Lai; Ru-Chuan Hu; Ya-Lin Yen
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.117

View more
  7 in total

1.  Pattern of pediatric eye injuries in Tehran, Iran.

Authors:  Mehdi Sharifzadeh; Elham Rahmanikhah; Nouzar Nakhaee
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Status of ocular trauma in hospitalized patients in Kashan, 2011: As a sample of industrial city.

Authors:  Mehdi Shaeri; Alireza Moravveji; Mohammad-Reza Fazel; Fatemeh Rangraz Jeddi
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2016-12-01

3.  Corneal and conjunctival injury seen in urgent care centres in Israel.

Authors:  Deena R Zimmerman; Einat Shneor; Michel Millodot; Ariela Gordon-Shaag
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  Role of Socioeconomic Status (SES) in Globe Injuries: A Review.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kousiouris; Olga Klavdianou; Konstantinos A A Douglas; Nikolaos Gouliopoulos; Klio Chatzistefanou; Maria Kantzanou; Georgios S Dimtsas; Marilita M Moschos
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-05

5.  Prevalence of Pediatric Ocular Trauma in Northern Iran; An Epidemiological Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Hanieh Ahmadi; Zahra Alizadeh; Samad Karkhah; Mohammad Javad Ghazanfari
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2022-01

6.  Epidemiology of patients hospitalized for ocular trauma in the Chaoshan region of China, 2001-2010.

Authors:  He Cao; Liping Li; Mingzhi Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Changing Trends in Eye-Related Complaints Presenting to the Emergency Department in Beirut, Lebanon, over 15 Years.

Authors:  Haytham I Salti; Carl-Joe Mehanna; Bachir Abiad; Nicola Ghazi; Samih Raad; Anita Barikian; Randa Haddad; Adnan Ashkar; Elie Harmouche; Elie Zaghrini; Afif Mufarrij
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 1.909

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.