Literature DB >> 20924617

Dexmedetomidine-ketamine and midazolam-ketamine combinations for sedation in pediatric patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized prospective study.

Senem Koruk1, Ayse Mizrak, Rauf Gul, Ertugrul Kilic, Fatih Yendi, Unsal Oner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) requires sedation in pediatric patients. Dexmedetomidine is a relatively new agent used for sedation. The aim of this randomized prospective study was to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine-ketamine and midazolam-ketamine combinations on the recovery time, hemodynamic and respiratory variables, and side effects in pediatric patients undergoing ESWL.
METHODS: Fifty pediatric patients aged between 2 and 15 years who were scheduled for elective ESWL were randomized into two groups. In Group D we applied dexmedetomidine at1 μg/kg, given over 10 min, and a bolus of 1 mg/kg ketamine for sedation. In Group M we applied midazolam at a 0.05 mg/kg bolus dose 10 min before the procedure and a 1 mg/kg bolus of ketamine. We measured and monitored the hemodynamic variables, oxygen saturation, and recovery time, and we also monitored the side effects.
RESULTS: Four patients in group D refused to complete the study; 21 patients in group D and 25 patients in group M completed the study. We found the recovery time [eye-opening time (9.3 ± 4.5 vs. 16.2 ± 6.5 min; p < 0.001), verbal response time (12.8 ± 4.9 vs. 19.2 ± 7.2 min; p < 0.001), and the cooperation time (17.1 ± 5.0 vs. 23.3 ± 7.7 min; p < 0.001)] to be shorter in the dexmedetomidine group. Also, the heart rate values were lower in the dexmedetomidine group at the 20th minute of the procedure (99.1 ± 19.0 vs. 118.7 ± 7.3 beats/min; p = 0.016).
CONCLUSION: In this study we found the recovery time to be shorter, with hemodynamic stability, in the dexmedetomidine group, compared with the midazolam group. So we can conclude that dexmedetomidine may be a good and safe alternative agent for sedation, with a shorter recovery period than midazolam, in the pediatric population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20924617     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-010-1023-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  33 in total

1.  Systemically administered alpha2-agonist-induced peripheral vasoconstriction in humans.

Authors:  Pekka Talke; Errol Lobo; Ronald Brown
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  The use of dexmedetomidine in pediatric cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Ahmed M Mukhtar; Eman M Obayah; Amira M Hassona
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 3.  Sedation for emergent diagnostic imaging studies in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Maia S Rutman
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.856

4.  A postanesthetic recovery score.

Authors:  J A Aldrete; D Kroulik
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1970 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 5.  Evidence-based clinical update: does premedication with oral midazolam lead to improved behavioural outcomes in children?

Authors:  Robin G Cox; Ulyana Nemish; Alastair Ewen; Marie-Josée Crowe
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Comparison of alfentanil and ketamine infusions in combination with midazolam for outpatient lithotripsy.

Authors:  T G Monk; J M Rater; P F White
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Postoperative pharmacokinetics and sympatholytic effects of dexmedetomidine.

Authors:  P Talke; C A Richardson; M Scheinin; D M Fisher
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteric stones in children.

Authors:  Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu; Ahmet Hamdi Tefekli; Fatih Altunrende; Mert Ali Karadag; Murat Baykal; Muzaffer Akcay
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Which anesthetic agent alters the hemodynamic status during pediatric catheterization? Comparison of propofol versus ketamine.

Authors:  E Oklü; F S Bulutcu; Y Yalçin; U Ozbek; E Cakali; O Bayindir
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Dexmedetomidine in combination with morphine PCA provides superior analgesia for shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jamal A Alhashemi; Abdullah M Kaki
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.063

View more
  11 in total

1.  IV paracetamol effect on propofol-ketamine consumption in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL.

Authors:  H Evren Eker; Oya Yalçin Cok; Pınar Ergenoğlu; Anış Ariboğan; Gülnaz Arslan
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Can pediatric Gamma Knife radiosurgery be managed under monitored anesthesia care? A case presentation and proposal from anesthesiologists.

Authors:  Haruko Hasegawa; Kotoe Kamata; Motohiro Hayashi; Noriaki Komayama; Takakazu Kawamata; Makoto Ozaki
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2019

3.  Intravenous ketamine compared with diclofenac suppository in suppressing acute postoperative pain in women undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy.

Authors:  Maryam Vosoughin; Shabnam Mohammadi; Ali Dabbagh
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Dexmedetomidine-ketamine sedation during bone marrow aspirate and biopsy in a patient with duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Andrew Rozmiarek; Marco Corridore; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2011-04

5.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Intramuscular and Intravenous Ketamine in Children.

Authors:  Christoph P Hornik; Daniel Gonzalez; John van den Anker; Andrew M Atz; Ram Yogev; Brenda B Poindexter; Kee Chong Ng; Paula Delmore; Barrie L Harper; Chiara Melloni; Andrew Lewandowski; Casey Gelber; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez; Jan Hau Lee
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Laparoscopic appendectomy under spinal anesthesia with dexmedetomidine infusion.

Authors:  Go-Woon Jun; Min-Su Kim; Hun-Ju Yang; Tae-Yun Sung; Dong-Ho Park; Choon-Kyu Cho; Hee-Uk Kwon; Po-Soon Kang; Ju-Ik Moon
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-10-27

7.  Meta-analysis of dexmedetomidine on emergence agitation and recovery profiles in children after sevoflurane anesthesia: different administration and different dosage.

Authors:  Min Zhu; Haiyun Wang; Ai Zhu; Kaijun Niu; Guolin Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Dexmedetomidine-ketamine versus Dexmedetomidine-midazolam-fentanyl for monitored anesthesia care during chemoport insertion: a Prospective Randomized Study.

Authors:  Eun Hee Chun; Myeong Jae Han; Hee Jung Baik; Hahck Soo Park; Rack Kyung Chung; Jong In Han; Hun Jung Lee; Jong Hak Kim
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  A study to compare the overall effectiveness between midazolam and dexmedetomidine during monitored anesthesia care: A randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Mohd Asim Rasheed; Dinesh Chandra Punera; Mehar Bano; Urmila Palaria; Abhilasha Tyagi; Shatrunjay Sharma
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2015 May-Aug

10.  Comparison of Ketamine with Midazolam versus Ketamine with Fentanyl for Pediatric Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Procedure: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Hakan Akelma; Ebru Tarikçi Kiliç; Fikret Salik; Ayhan Kaydu
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.