STUDY DESIGN: Randomized control study assessing the efficacy of a pedicle screw insertion simulator. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of an in-house developed 3-dimensional software simulation tool for teaching pedicle screw insertion, to gather feedback about the utility of the simulator, and to help identify the context and role such simulation has in surgical education. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Traditional instruction for pedicle screw insertion technique consists of didactic teaching and limited hands-on training on artificial or cadaveric models before guided supervision within the operating room. Three-dimensional computer simulation can provide a valuable tool for practicing challenging surgical procedures; however, its potential lies in its effective integration into student learning. METHODS:Surgical residents were recruited from 2 sequential years of a spine surgery course. Patient and control groups both received standard training on pedicle screw insertion. The patient group received an additional 1-hour session of training on the simulator using a CT-based 3-dimensional model of their assigned cadaver's spine. Qualitative feedback about the simulator was gathered from the trainees, fellows, and staff surgeons, and all pedicles screws physically inserted into the cadavers during the courses were evaluated through CT. RESULTS:A total of 185 thoracic and lumbar pedicle screws were inserted by 37 trainees. Eighty-two percent of the 28 trainees who responded to the questionnaire and all fellows and staff surgeons felt the simulator to be a beneficial educational tool. However, the 1-hour training session did not yield improved performance in screw placement. CONCLUSIONS: A 3-dimensional computer-based simulation for pedicle screw insertion was integrated into a cadaveric spine surgery instructional course. Overall, the tool was positively regarded by the trainees, fellows, and staff surgeons. However, the limited training with the simulator did not translate into widespread comfort with its operation or into improvement in physical screw placement.
RCT Entities:
STUDY DESIGN: Randomized control study assessing the efficacy of a pedicle screw insertion simulator. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of an in-house developed 3-dimensional software simulation tool for teaching pedicle screw insertion, to gather feedback about the utility of the simulator, and to help identify the context and role such simulation has in surgical education. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Traditional instruction for pedicle screw insertion technique consists of didactic teaching and limited hands-on training on artificial or cadaveric models before guided supervision within the operating room. Three-dimensional computer simulation can provide a valuable tool for practicing challenging surgical procedures; however, its potential lies in its effective integration into student learning. METHODS: Surgical residents were recruited from 2 sequential years of a spine surgery course. Patient and control groups both received standard training on pedicle screw insertion. The patient group received an additional 1-hour session of training on the simulator using a CT-based 3-dimensional model of their assigned cadaver's spine. Qualitative feedback about the simulator was gathered from the trainees, fellows, and staff surgeons, and all pedicles screws physically inserted into the cadavers during the courses were evaluated through CT. RESULTS: A total of 185 thoracic and lumbar pedicle screws were inserted by 37 trainees. Eighty-two percent of the 28 trainees who responded to the questionnaire and all fellows and staff surgeons felt the simulator to be a beneficial educational tool. However, the 1-hour training session did not yield improved performance in screw placement. CONCLUSIONS: A 3-dimensional computer-based simulation for pedicle screw insertion was integrated into a cadaveric spine surgery instructional course. Overall, the tool was positively regarded by the trainees, fellows, and staff surgeons. However, the limited training with the simulator did not translate into widespread comfort with its operation or into improvement in physical screw placement.
Authors: Kenneth C Wang; Anja Jones; Shivkumar Kambhampati; Mohit N Gilotra; Peter C Liacouras; Satre Stuelke; Brian Shiu; Natalie Leong; S Ashfaq Hasan; Eliot L Siegel Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 4.056