Literature DB >> 20923993

The impact of hospital cardiac specialization on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: analysis of medicare claims data.

Saket Girotra1, Xin Lu, Ioana Popescu, Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin, Phillip A Horwitz, Peter Cram.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospital volume has been widely embraced as a proxy measure for hospital quality; little attention has been focused on an alternative quality measure-hospital specialization. Even though specialization occurs on a continuum, previous studies have only focused on a small number of highly specialized hospitals (single-specialty hospitals). Studies on the broad relationship between hospital specialization and outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are limited. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 705 084 Medicare patients (1130 hospitals) who underwent CABG during 2001 to 2005. We stratified hospitals into quintiles, based on their degree of cardiac specialization (proportion of a hospital's Medicare discharges classified as Major Diagnostic Category 5-cardiovascular diseases). We compared patient and hospital characteristics and outcomes across quintiles of cardiac specialization. Patient characteristics were generally similar across quintiles, but mean annual CABG volume increased progressively from quintile 1 (least specialized) to quintile 5 (most specialized). Unadjusted 30-day mortality was similar at hospitals in quintiles 1 to 4 (4.8%), except quintile 5, where mortality was lower (4.3%). A strong inverse association was seen between hospital cardiac specialization and 30-day mortality after adjustment for patient characteristics (P(trend)=0.001). However, this was no longer significant after additional adjustment for CABG volume (P(trend)=0.65). Results were similar for other mortality outcomes and length of stay.
CONCLUSIONS: After accounting for patient characteristics and CABG volume, greater cardiac specialization was not associated with clinically significant improvement in patient outcomes. This study calls into question the benefit of cardiac specialization for the vast majority of CABG-performing US hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20923993      PMCID: PMC3067977          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.943282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  28 in total

1.  Improving the safety of health care: the leapfrog initiative.

Authors:  A Milstein; R S Galvin; S F Delbanco; P Salber; C R Buck
Journal:  Eff Clin Pract       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec

2.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Validity of information on comorbidity derived rom ICD-9-CCM administrative data.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Gerry A Parsons; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Specialization and its discontents: the pernicious impact of regulations against specialization and physician ownership on the US healthcare system.

Authors:  Regina E Herzlinger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-05-25       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Edward L Hannan; Mark Radzyner; David Rubin; James Dougherty; Murray F Brennan
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  A decade of change--risk profiles and outcomes for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, 1990-1999: a report from the STS National Database Committee and the Duke Clinical Research Institute. Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  T Bruce Ferguson; Bradley G Hammill; Eric D Peterson; Elizabeth R DeLong; Frederick L Grover
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Association of volume with outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Scheduled vs nonscheduled operations.

Authors:  J A Showstack; K E Rosenfeld; D W Garnick; H S Luft; R W Schaffarzick; J Fowles
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-02-13       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative.

Authors:  J D Birkmeyer; E V Finlayson; C M Birkmeyer
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery volume and patient mortality, 1998-2000.

Authors:  Saif S Rathore; Andrew J Epstein; Kevin G M Volpp; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Procedural volume as a marker of quality for CABG surgery.

Authors:  Eric D Peterson; Laura P Coombs; Elizabeth R DeLong; Constance K Haan; T Bruce Ferguson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.