Literature DB >> 20923988

Development and validation of risk adjustment models for long-term mortality and myocardial infarction following percutaneous coronary interventions.

Mandeep Singh1, David R Holmes, Ryan J Lennon, Charanjit S Rihal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Existing models for outcome after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) lack assessment of long-term prognosis. Our goal was to derive 1- and 5-year mortality and mortality/myocardial infarction (MI) risk models for PCI outcomes from simple, easily obtainable clinical and laboratory variables. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Using the Mayo Clinic registry, we analyzed long-term mortality and mortality/MI following PCIs on 9165 unique patients from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2007. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to model the calculated risk score and major procedural complications. A total of 1243 patients died, and 696 had MI. Separate risk models derived from clinical, procedural, and laboratory characteristics were made for mortality and mortality/MI. Older age, comorbid conditions, low ejection fraction, acute MI, history of smoking, heart failure, hyperlipidemia, 3-vessel disease, procedural failure, ventricular arrhythmia during PCI, and low medication score were predictors of long-term mortality and mortality/MI. Simple integer scores stratified patients into low, moderate, high, and very high risk for subsequent events. Models had adequate goodness of fit, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.786 and 0.728 for mortality and mortality/MI, respectively, indicating good overall discrimination. Bootstrap analysis indicated that the model was not overfit to the available data set.
CONCLUSIONS: Easily obtainable variables can be combined into a convenient risk scoring system at the time of patient dismissal following PCI to accurately predict long-term mortality and mortality/MI. This model may be useful for providing patients with individualized, evidence-based estimates of long-term risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20923988     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.924308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  5 in total

1.  2016 Revision of the SCAI position statement on public reporting.

Authors:  Lloyd W Klein; Kishore J Harjai; Fred Resnic; William S Weintraub; H Vernon Anderson; Robert W Yeh; Dmitriy N Feldman; Osvaldo S Gigliotti; Kenneth Rosenfeld; Peter Duffy
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  CMR in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Daniel M Sado; Jonathan M Hasleton; Anna S Herrey; James C Moon
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 1.866

3.  Role of frailty assessment in patients undergoing cardiac interventions.

Authors:  Rebecca Rowe; Javaid Iqbal; Rachel Murali-Krishnan; Ayyaz Sultan; Rachel Orme; Norman Briffa; Martin Denvir; Julian Gunn
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2014-02-01

Review 4.  Frailty Syndrome in Older Adults with Cardiovascular Diseases-What Do We Know and What Requires Further Research?

Authors:  Marta Wleklik; Quin Denfeld; Magdalena Lisiak; Michał Czapla; Marta Kałużna-Oleksy; Izabella Uchmanowicz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Echocardiographic parameters as predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Miroslava Sladojevic; Srdjan Sladojevic; Dubravko Culibrk; Snezana Tadic; Robert Jung
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-03-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.