Literature DB >> 20921816

Preoperative indexed left ventricular dimensions to predict early recovery of left ventricular function after aortic valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation.

Sang-Ho Cho1, Chun-Sung Byun, Kwan-Wook Kim, Byung-Chul Chang, Kyung-Jong Yoo, Sak Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) improves left ventricular (LV) systolic function in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation (AR). The objective of this study is to determine predictors for normalization of impaired LV systolic function after valve replacement for chronic AR. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Between 1997 and 2007, 171 patients underwent AVR for severe chronic AR. Of these patients, 79 patients with LV systolic dysfunction or severe LV dilatation preoperatively, who were evaluated by echocardiography at predischarge and early follow up (mean, 6 months) were examined. The mean preoperative ejection fraction was 49%. The mean LV end-systolic and end-diastolic dimensions were 52.32 ± 8.35 mm and 69.59 ± 7.80 mm, respectively. In the early follow up, 62 of 79 patients exhibited restored normal LV function. LV end-systolic dimension and LV end-diastolic dimension were significantly decreased early after AVR (52.32 ± 8.35 mm vs 37.82 ± 6.88 mm, and 69.59 ± 7.80 mm vs 51.55 ± 6.40 mm, respectively). Operative mortality was 3.7%. Multivariate stepwise regression analysis revealed that preoperative indexed LV end-systolic and end-diastolic dimensions were independent predictors of restored LV systolic function. The sensitivity and specificity in predicting normalization of LV function were 88% and 92% for indexed LVESD <35.32 mm/m(2) and 71% and 86% for indexed LVEDD <44.42 mm/m(2).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients who received a valve replacement for chronic AR, smaller indexed LV systolic and diastolic dimensions were associated with early restoration of LV systolic function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20921816     DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-0278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ J        ISSN: 1346-9843            Impact factor:   2.993


  7 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary reviews by surgeon: timing of operation for chronic aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Taniguchi; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-09-26

2.  Mixed aortic valve disease in the young: initial observations.

Authors:  Allison C Hill; David W Brown; Steven D Colan; Kimberly Gauvreau; Pedro J del Nido; James E Lock; Rahul H Rathod
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Long term results and predictors of left ventricular function recovery after aortic valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Saisho; Koichi Arinaga; Satoshi Kikusaki; Yuichiro Hirata; Kumiko Wada; Tatsuyuki Kakuma; Hiroyuki Tanaka
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 4.  Timing of Surgical Intervention for Aortic Regurgitation.

Authors:  Brett Hiendlmayr; Joseph Nakda; Ossama Elsaid; Xuan Wang; Aidan Flynn
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-11

5.  Left ventricle reverse remodeling in chronic aortic regurgitation patients with dilated ventricle after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Ming-Kui Zhang; Li-Na Li; Hui Xue; Xiu-Jie Tang; He Sun; Qing-Yu Wu
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  Reverse remodelling after aortic valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  Ayumi Koga-Ikuta; Satsuki Fukushima; Naonori Kawamoto; Tetsuya Saito; Yusuke Shimahara; Shin Yajima; Naoki Tadokoro; Takashi Kakuta; Toshihiro Fukui; Tomoyuki Fujita
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-06-28

7.  Prognostic factors associated with postoperative adverse outcomes in patients with aortic valve prolapse.

Authors:  Yanping Ruan; Xiaowei Liu; Xu Meng; Haibo Zhang; Yihua He
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.