Literature DB >> 20921492

Moving comparative effectiveness research into practice: implementation science and the role of academic medicine.

Ann C Bonham1, Mildred Z Solomon.   

Abstract

The success of the federal investment in comparative effectiveness research will hinge on using the power of science to guide reforms in health care delivery and improve patient-centered outcomes. Translating the results of comparative effectiveness research into practice calls for the rigors of implementation science to ensure the efficient and systematic uptake, dissemination, and endurance of these innovations. Academic medicine can help answer the call by thoroughly integrating its research and training missions with clinical care that is focused on patient-centered outcomes; building multidisciplinary teams that include a wide range of experts such as clinicians, clinical and implementation scientists, systems engineers, behavioral economists, and social scientists; and training future care providers, scientists, and educators to carry innovations forward.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20921492     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  10 in total

1.  Querying stakeholders to inform comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Yoon Duk Hong; Daisuke Goto; C Daniel Mullins
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 1.744

2.  Translational educational research: a necessity for effective health-care improvement.

Authors:  William C McGaghie; S Barry Issenberg; Elaine R Cohen; Jeffrey H Barsuk; Diane B Wayne
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Optimizing health for complex adults in primary care: current challenges and a way forward.

Authors:  Hollis Day; Elizabeth Eckstrom; Sei Lee; Heidi Wald; Steven Counsell; Eugene Rich
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Variation in Stakeholder Preferences for Implementing Evidence-Based Practices in Behavioral Health Care.

Authors:  Molly Candon; Nathaniel Williams; Kelly Zentgraf; Alison Buttenheim; Meenakshi Bewtra; Rinad S Beidas; Rebecca E Stewart
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Dissemination and implementation of comparative effectiveness evidence: key informant interviews with Clinical and Translational Science Award institutions.

Authors:  Elaine H Morrato; Thomas W Concannon; Paul Meissner; Nilay D Shah; Barbara J Turner
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.744

6.  A model to support shared decision making in electronic health records systems.

Authors:  Leslie Lenert; Robert Dunlea; Guilherme Del Fiol; Leslie Kelly Hall
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Differences in Perceptions of Patient Safety Culture between Charge and Noncharge Nurses: Implications for Effectiveness Outcomes Research.

Authors:  Deleise Wilson; Richard W Redman; Akkeneel Talsma; Michelle Aebersold
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2012-03-22

8.  From Research to Practice: Which Research Strategy Contributes More to Clinical Excellence? Comparing High-Volume versus High-Quality Biomedical Research.

Authors:  Anat Tchetchik; Amir Grinstein; Eran Manes; Daniel Shapira; Ronen Durst
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Building and executing a research agenda toward conducting implementation science in medical education.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Gerald E Crites; Karen H Miller; Michelle Haight; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Eileen Cichoskikelly; David W Price; Modupeola O Akinola; Victoria C Scott; Summers Kalishman
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2016-08-25

Review 10.  Implementing Anti-Racism Interventions in Healthcare Settings: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Nadha Hassen; Aisha Lofters; Sinit Michael; Amita Mall; Andrew D Pinto; Julia Rackal
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.