Literature DB >> 20921215

Frequent monitoring of A1C during pregnancy as a treatment tool to guide therapy.

Lois Jovanovic1, Hatice Savas, Manish Mehta, Angelina Trujillo, David J Pettitt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: No guidelines for A1C measurement exist for women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The aim of this study was to document the rate of A1C decline in women with GDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Women with GDM in the Santa Barbara County Endocrine Clinic are managed with a carbohydrate-restricted diet and self-monitored blood glucose before and 1-h postprandial. Insulin is started if the preprandial glucose concentration is ≥90 mg/dl and/or a 1-h postprandial glucose concentration is ≥120 mg/dl. Capillary A1C was tested weekly using the DCA2000+ analyzer.
RESULTS: Twenty-four women with GDM (aged 29.0 ± 7.3 years) with initial A1C ≥7.0% were recruited. Baseline A1C was 8.8 ± 1.8%. Mean A1C decline was 0.47% per week (range 0.10-1.15%); the maximum was 4.3% in 4 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: This study documents rapid decline in A1C during pregnancy and the utility of weekly A1C to guide therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20921215      PMCID: PMC3005444          DOI: 10.2337/dc10-1455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


A1C is routinely measured approximately every 3 months in individuals with diabetes to assess the mean glucose concentration. The erythrocyte life span is ∼120 days (1). Thus, the 3-month interval between tests of A1C reflects the mean blood glucose over the preceding weeks to months. There are no clear guidelines for the frequency of testing A1C during pregnancy (2). In pregnancies complicated by type 1 or type 2 diabetes, most studies report the relationship between the first trimester A1C and the risk of spontaneous abortion and/or congenital malformations (3,4). The goal for therapy in pregestational diabetes is to sustain the A1C at <6.0%, although this level of A1C assumes that the measurement is performed only once each trimester (5–9). In addition, A1C is not recommended routinely in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The life span of the erythrocyte during pregnancy is shortened to ∼90 days, and thus the test measures the mean glucose over a shorter time interval than in the nonpregnant state (10). Hence, the rate of change of A1C in pregnancy reflects the glycemic control over the past few weeks. Therefore, the measurement of A1C more frequently during pregnancy may be used to guide therapeutic decisions in all pregnancies complicated by diabetes including GDM. The aim of this study was to document the rate of A1C decline during the first 4 weeks after the initiation of treatment in women with GDM.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was an observational study of pregnant women attending the Santa Barbara County Health Care Services Obstetrics Clinic for care who have the diagnosis of GDM (diabetes first diagnosed during pregnancy [2]) and who were referred to the Prenatal Diabetes/Endocrine Clinic for management. Because of the high rates of diabetes in this largely Latino population and because many of the women only seek medical attention during pregnancy, women are screened for GDM very early in pregnancy. Many women found to have diabetes early in pregnancy undoubtedly have preexisting type 2 diabetes, which falls under the classification of GDM when first identified during pregnancy. Treatment consists of a carbohydrate-restricted meal plan (11) and fingerstick blood glucose monitoring before and 1-h after each meal (11). Insulin is initiated if the diet does not achieve premeal glucose concentrations <90 mg/dl and/or 1-h postprandial glucose concentrations <120 mg/dl within 1 week of the carbohydrate restriction prescription (12,13). For simplicity in the clinic and to impress upon the diabetic women the importance of tight glucose control, a point of care A1C by fingerstick is routinely obtained at every weekly visit and analyzed immediately using the DCA2000+ analyzer (14,15). The DCA A1C is a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-waived test with a coefficient of variation of 2.3–3.3% at a normal A1C concentration of 5.2 and of 2.8–3.7% at an elevated A1C concentration of 11.9%.

RESULTS

Twenty-four Latina women with the diagnosis of GDM whose initial A1C was ≥7.0% and followed during the first 1–4 weeks of treatment were included in the analysis. The mean ± SD age was 29.0 ± 7.3 years, A1C at enrollment was 8.80 ± 1.83, and the duration of follow-up for this study was 3.2 ± 1.0 weeks. Mean gestational age at diagnosis of GDM was 12.2 ± 7.4 weeks. Figure 1 shows the A1C decline during the first 4 weeks of treatment (range 1.0–4.0 weeks) for all 24 women. The mean decline was 0.47 ± 0.30% per week, and the maximum decline over the 4 weeks was 4.3%. The decline was greatest among women with the highest A1C at baseline. Among the 20 women with an initial A1C <10.0%, the decline was 0.36 ± 0.15% per week. After the 1st month of decline, the A1C stabilized with a small drop of only 0.05% per week to the end of gestation (data not shown).
Figure 1

A1C (%) at enrollment and weekly for up to 4 weeks of follow-up in 24 women with GDM.

A1C (%) at enrollment and weekly for up to 4 weeks of follow-up in 24 women with GDM.

CONCLUSIONS

This study documents that a rapid decline in A1C can be achieved during pregnancy when normoglycemia is vigorously instituted and achieved and thereafter sustained for 4 weeks. Home glucose monitoring on a regular basis is certainly the cornerstone of management of GDM and was initiated in the women enrolled in this study from the beginning. However, many high glucose values can be missed with the usual six or seven fingersticks per day. When A1C is measured at every weekly visit and the result is compared with the woman's previous value, then the rate of change of A1C (decline or rise) can be used to assess the glycemic control and guide therapeutic decisions. A randomized trial in a larger group of women will be needed to determine whether weekly A1C measurements will lead to an improvement in outcome.
  13 in total

1.  The Santa Barbara County Health Care Services program: birth weight change concomitant with screening for and treatment of glucose-intolerance of pregnancy: a potential cost-effective intervention?

Authors:  L Jovanovic-Peterson; W Bevier; C M Peterson
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  A1C in gestational diabetes mellitus in Asian Indian women.

Authors:  Vijayam Balaji; Balji S Madhuri; Srinivasan Ashalatha; Suganthi Sheela; S Suresh; Veerasamy Seshiah
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Advances in hemoglobin A1c point of care technology.

Authors:  Bruce W Bode; Benjamin R Irvin; Jeffrey A Pierce; Michael Allen; Annette L Clark
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-05

4.  Gestational diabetes: a reappraisal of HBA1c as a screening test.

Authors:  Mukesh M Agarwal; Gurdeep S Dhatt; John Punnose; Gertrude Koster
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Treatment of women with an abnormal glucose challenge test (but a normal oral glucose tolerance test) decreases the prevalence of macrosomia.

Authors:  W C Bevier; R Fischer; L Jovanovic
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Comparison of fingerstick hemoglobin A1c levels assayed by DCA 2000 with the DCCT/EDIC central laboratory assay: results of a Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study.

Authors:  William V Tamborlane; Craig Kollman; Michael W Steffes; Katrina J Ruedy; Xing Dongyuan; Roy W Beck; Peter Chase; Larry A Fox; Darrell M Wilson; Eva Tsalikian
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.866

7.  Glycosylated hemoglobin level in the second trimester predicts birth weight and amniotic fluid volume in non-diabetic pregnancies with abnormal screening test.

Authors:  Deniz Karcaaltincaba; Serdar Yalvac; Omer Kandemir; Serpil Altun
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2010-10

8.  Factors predicting the need for insulin therapy in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Andreia David Sapienza; Rossana Pulcineli Vieira Francisco; Thatianne Coutheux Trindade; Marcelo Zugaib
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.602

Review 9.  The clinical utility of glycosylated hemoglobin.

Authors:  L Jovanovic; C M Peterson
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Incidence of spontaneous abortion among normal women and insulin-dependent diabetic women whose pregnancies were identified within 21 days of conception.

Authors:  J L Mills; J L Simpson; S G Driscoll; L Jovanovic-Peterson; M Van Allen; J H Aarons; B Metzger; F R Bieber; R H Knopp; L B Holmes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  10 in total

1.  Three Days Compared to One Day Per Week of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Mild Gestational Diabetes: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Jesrine Gek Shan Hong; Ahmad Firdzaus Mohd Noor; Peng Chiong Tan
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 2.  Gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Eman M Alfadhli
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.484

3.  Role of free style Libre-Flash Glucose Monitoring: Glycemic control of Type-1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Imad A A Mohamed; Iman M Talaat; Hamed A Alghamdi; Gamal Allam
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

Review 4.  Glycemic variability: Importance, relationship with physical activity, and the influence of exercise.

Authors:  Joshua R Sparks; Erin E Kishman; Mark A Sarzynski; J Mark Davis; Peter W Grandjean; J Larry Durstine; Xuewen Wang
Journal:  Sports Med Health Sci       Date:  2021-10-11

Review 5.  Current concepts in blood glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Kranti Shreesh Khadilkar; Tushar Bandgar; Vyankatesh Shivane; Anurag Lila; Nalini Shah
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-12

6.  Use of a real time continuous glucose monitoring system as an educational tool for patients with gestational diabetes.

Authors:  Eman Alfadhli; Eman Osman; Taghreed Basri
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.320

7.  The Gestational Diabetes Management System (GooDMomS): development, feasibility and lessons learned from a patient-informed, web-based pregnancy and postpartum lifestyle intervention.

Authors:  Wanda K Nicholson; A Jenna Beckham; Karen Hatley; Molly Diamond; La-Shell Johnson; Sherri L Green; Deborah Tate
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Type 1 diabetes through the life span: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association.

Authors:  Jane L Chiang; M Sue Kirkman; Lori M B Laffel; Anne L Peters
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Glycated hemoglobin predicts coronary artery disease in non-diabetic adults.

Authors:  Mohammed Ewid; Hossam Sherif; Syed Muhammad Baqui Billah; Nazmus Saquib; Wael AlEnazy; Omer Ragab; Saed Enabi; Tawfik Rajab; Zaki Awad; Rami Abazid
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 2.298

10.  Treatment options of Adolescent Gestational Diabetes: Effect on Outcome.

Authors:  Shaymaa Kadhim Jasim; Hayder Al-Momen; Maisaa Anees Wahbi
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.