BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) results from a genetic deficiency of C1-inhibitor. Two similar independent, randomized, saline controlled, double-blind studies were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human C1-inhibitor (rhC1INH) as a treatment of acute angioedema attacks in patients with HAE. OBJECTIVE: Analysis of pooled study results. METHODS:Patients with an eligible attack were randomized to a single intravenous dose of rhC1INH or saline. Efficacy was assessed by using patient-reported visual analog scale outcomes, and safety was assessed by using adverse events and immunogenicity of rhC1INH. RESULTS:rhC1INH at 100 (n = 29) and 50 (n = 12) U/kg body weight resulted in a significant reduction for both the primary endpoint time to the beginning of relief of symptoms compared with saline (n = 29): median, 66 (95% CI, 61-122) minutes, 122 (72-136) minutes, and 495 (245-520) minutes, P < .001 and P = .013, respectively; and for the secondary endpoint time to minimal symptoms, median, 266 (242-490) minutes, 247 (243-484) minutes, and 1210 (970-1500) minutes, P < .001 and P = .001, respectively. Therapeutic failure occurred in 59% (17/29) of the saline group compared with 0% (0/12) of the 50 U/kg group and 10% (3/29) of the 100 U/kg group. Treatment-emergent adverse events were unremarkable and tended to be reported more frequently in the saline group. No postexposure antibody responses against rhC1INH or host-related impurities were observed. CONCLUSION: Administration of rhC1INH at 100 or 50 U/kg was highly effective as a treatment of acute attacks in patients with HAE and appeared to be safe and well tolerated.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Hereditary angioedema (HAE) results from a genetic deficiency of C1-inhibitor. Two similar independent, randomized, saline controlled, double-blind studies were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human C1-inhibitor (rhC1INH) as a treatment of acute angioedema attacks in patients with HAE. OBJECTIVE: Analysis of pooled study results. METHODS:Patients with an eligible attack were randomized to a single intravenous dose of rhC1INH or saline. Efficacy was assessed by using patient-reported visual analog scale outcomes, and safety was assessed by using adverse events and immunogenicity of rhC1INH. RESULTS: rhC1INH at 100 (n = 29) and 50 (n = 12) U/kg body weight resulted in a significant reduction for both the primary endpoint time to the beginning of relief of symptoms compared with saline (n = 29): median, 66 (95% CI, 61-122) minutes, 122 (72-136) minutes, and 495 (245-520) minutes, P < .001 and P = .013, respectively; and for the secondary endpoint time to minimal symptoms, median, 266 (242-490) minutes, 247 (243-484) minutes, and 1210 (970-1500) minutes, P < .001 and P = .001, respectively. Therapeutic failure occurred in 59% (17/29) of the saline group compared with 0% (0/12) of the 50 U/kg group and 10% (3/29) of the 100 U/kg group. Treatment-emergent adverse events were unremarkable and tended to be reported more frequently in the saline group. No postexposure antibody responses against rhC1INH or host-related impurities were observed. CONCLUSION: Administration of rhC1INH at 100 or 50 U/kg was highly effective as a treatment of acute attacks in patients with HAE and appeared to be safe and well tolerated.
Authors: Louanne M Tourangeau; Anthony J Castaldo; Donna K Davis; James Koziol; Sandra C Christiansen; Bruce L Zuraw Journal: Int Arch Allergy Immunol Date: 2011-11-25 Impact factor: 2.749