BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: The absence of vagina is rare in the pediatric population. It can occur as a result of congenital malformations such as an aplasia of mullerian ducts (46,XX Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome) or a complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (46,XY testicular feminizing syndrome). Intersex patients, who underwent reassessment of a female sex, need a genital reconstruction toward a feminine phenotype. Patients with congenital adrenogenital syndrome with high urogenital sinus could have a severe hypoplastic vagina. In all these cases, a vaginal replacement is required. We reviewed our experience of vaginal replacement using a sigmoid conduit. METHODS: In 34 years, we evaluated 47 patients. The observation period was from 1 to 34 years (mean: 12 years). The preoperative diagnosis was Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome in 17 cases, androgen insensitivity syndrome in 24 cases, adrenogenital syndrome with high urogenital sinus in 5 and 1 patient was affected by penile agenesis. Forty-six patients were treated with vaginal reconstruction by interposition of sigmoid colon. Only in 1 case we performed a vaginal construction with an ileal loop: in this case, the sigmoid colon was extremely dilated by a chronic constipation secondary to a high anorectal malformation corrected at birth. RESULTS: The outcome for 47 patients is excellent: 18 are sexually active and 4 are married. Only 1 patient with adrenogenital syndrome died of endocrine problems. Complications occurred in 17 cases: in 1 patient a necrosis of the replaced vagina occurred, thus requiring vaginal exeresis; now she is waiting for a second operation. Another patient had an abdominal abscess, which was surgically treated. In 12 cases a second procedure was required: 6 had stenotic new-vaginal introitus, 4 had new-vaginal prolapse, and 2 had intestinal obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that the preferable technique for vaginal replacement is the use of intestinal conduit. The sigmoid colon is the best intestinal tract to be used owing to its size, location and preserved blood supply. Our experience leads us to believe that the sigmoid segment is the segment of choice, although we consider ileal loop as a good alternative when the sigmoid colon is not available.
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: The absence of vagina is rare in the pediatric population. It can occur as a result of congenital malformations such as an aplasia of mullerian ducts (46,XX Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome) or a complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (46,XY testicular feminizing syndrome). Intersex patients, who underwent reassessment of a female sex, need a genital reconstruction toward a feminine phenotype. Patients with congenital adrenogenital syndrome with high urogenital sinus could have a severe hypoplastic vagina. In all these cases, a vaginal replacement is required. We reviewed our experience of vaginal replacement using a sigmoid conduit. METHODS: In 34 years, we evaluated 47 patients. The observation period was from 1 to 34 years (mean: 12 years). The preoperative diagnosis was Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome in 17 cases, androgen insensitivity syndrome in 24 cases, adrenogenital syndrome with high urogenital sinus in 5 and 1 patient was affected by penile agenesis. Forty-six patients were treated with vaginal reconstruction by interposition of sigmoid colon. Only in 1 case we performed a vaginal construction with an ileal loop: in this case, the sigmoid colon was extremely dilated by a chronic constipation secondary to a high anorectal malformation corrected at birth. RESULTS: The outcome for 47 patients is excellent: 18 are sexually active and 4 are married. Only 1 patient with adrenogenital syndrome died of endocrine problems. Complications occurred in 17 cases: in 1 patient a necrosis of the replaced vagina occurred, thus requiring vaginal exeresis; now she is waiting for a second operation. Another patient had an abdominal abscess, which was surgically treated. In 12 cases a second procedure was required: 6 had stenotic new-vaginal introitus, 4 had new-vaginal prolapse, and 2 had intestinal obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that the preferable technique for vaginal replacement is the use of intestinal conduit. The sigmoid colon is the best intestinal tract to be used owing to its size, location and preserved blood supply. Our experience leads us to believe that the sigmoid segment is the segment of choice, although we consider ileal loop as a good alternative when the sigmoid colon is not available.