Literature DB >> 20920424

Impact of tissue heterogeneity on noninvasive near-infrared glucose measurements in interstitial fluid of rat skin.

Natalia V Alexeeva1, Mark A Arnold.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Movement of the optical interface used to collect noninvasive near-infrared spectra is known to dramatically increase prediction errors for glucose concentration measurements within the interstitial fluid of living rat skin. Prediction errors increase by more than 2.5-fold when the interface is moved before each non-invasive measurement compared to measurements where the interface position is constant throughout. Chemical heterogeneity of the skin matrix is examined as a possible mechanism for the strong sensitivity to the interface placement during noninvasive measurements conducted from transmission near-infrared absorption spectroscopy.
METHOD: Microspectroscopy was performed over a region of the near-infrared spectrum (4000-5000 cm(-1)) to map the concentrations of water, collagen protein, fat, and keratin protein within the skin tissue matrix through which noninvasive spectra are collected. Maps were created for multiple samples of skin excised from male and female animals. Sets of near-infrared spectra were constructed to simulate noninvasive spectra in accord with the basic tissue composition found from the microspectroscopic maps with added information corresponding to a span of glucose concentrations ranging from 5 to 35 mM and Gaussian-distributed noise.
RESULTS: Microspectroscopic maps of rat skin reveal similar patterns of heterogeneity for major chemical components of skin samples excised from both male and female animals. These maps demonstrate concentration domains with dimensions similar to the size of the fiber interface used to collect noninvasive spectra. Partial least squares calibration models generated from sets of simulated spectra demonstrate increases in prediction errors for glucose when the spectral matrix is changed in accord with the degree of chemical heterogeneity displayed in the skin maps. Prediction errors typically increase between 100 and 1000% when comparing errors generated from spectra that represent a single tissue composition versus spectra that represent a varied skin composition in accord with the distribution displayed in the skin maps.
CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of the major components of skin is not uniform, but establishes domains within the skin matrix that strongly impact prediction errors for the noninvasive spectroscopic measurement of glucose within the interstitial fluid of rat dermis tissue. The observed increase in prediction error (>2.5-fold) determined from actual noninvasive measurements is within the lower range of prediction error increases demonstrated by this simulation study. These findings implicate that chemical heterogeneity within the tissue matrix is a major factor in the sensitivity of the location of the fiber interface used to collect noninvasive spectral data.
© 2010 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20920424      PMCID: PMC2956801          DOI: 10.1177/193229681000400503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  19 in total

1.  A novel approach to mitigating the physiological lag between blood and interstitial fluid glucose measurements.

Authors:  Philip J Stout; Joel R Racchini; Michael E Hilgers
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 2.  Non-invasive glucose measurement technologies: an update from 1999 to the dawn of the new millennium.

Authors:  Omar S Khalil
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 3.  Spatial resolution in infrared microspectroscopic imaging of tissues.

Authors:  Peter Lasch; Dieter Naumann
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2006-06-09

4.  Comparison of performance of partial least squares regression, secured principal component regression, and modified secured principal component regression for determination of human serum albumin, gamma-globulin and glucose in buffer solutions and in vivo blood glucose quantification by near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Bo-Yan Li; Sumaporn Kasemsumran; Yun Hu; Yi-Zeng Liang; Yukihiro Ozaki
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 4.142

5.  Mid infrared microspectroscopic mapping and imaging: a bio-analytical tool for spatially and chemically resolved tissue characterization and evaluation of drug permeation within tissues.

Authors:  Patrick Garidel; Matthias Boese
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.769

Review 6.  A tale of two compartments: interstitial versus blood glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Eda Cengiz; William V Tamborlane
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.118

7.  Selectivity for glucose, glucose-6-phosphate, and pyruvate in ternary mixtures from the multivariate analysis of near-infrared spectra.

Authors:  Lingzhi Liu; Mark A Arnold
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 4.142

8.  Selectivity assessment of noninvasive glucose measurements based on analysis of multivariate calibration vectors.

Authors:  Mark A Arnold; Lingzhi Liu; Jonathon T Olesberg
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-07

9.  Near-infrared microspectroscopic analysis of rat skin tissue heterogeneity in relation to noninvasive glucose sensing.

Authors:  Natalia V Alexeeva; Mark A Arnold
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-03-01

10.  Modeling glucose and water dynamics in human skin.

Authors:  W Groenendaal; K A Schmidt; G von Basum; N A W van Riel; P A J Hilbers
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.118

View more
  5 in total

1.  Interstitial fluid physiology as it relates to glucose monitoring technologies: symposium introduction.

Authors:  Natalie A Wisniewski; Uli Klueh; Julie Stenken
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

Review 2.  Biocompatible materials for continuous glucose monitoring devices.

Authors:  Scott P Nichols; Ahyeon Koh; Wesley L Storm; Jae Ho Shin; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  The Effect of a Global, Subject, and Device-Specific Model on a Noninvasive Glucose Monitoring Multisensor System.

Authors:  Andreas Caduff; Mattia Zanon; Martin Mueller; Pavel Zakharov; Yuri Feldman; Oscar De Feo; Marc Donath; Werner A Stahel; Mark S Talary
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-24

4.  Diabetes Technology Meeting 2020.

Authors:  Trisha Shang; Jennifer Y Zhang; B Wayne Bequette; Jennifer K Raymond; Gerard Coté; Jennifer L Sherr; Jessica Castle; John Pickup; Yarmela Pavlovic; Juan Espinoza; Laurel H Messer; Tim Heise; Carlos E Mendez; Sarah Kim; Barry H Ginsberg; Umesh Masharani; Rodolfo J Galindo; David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-07

5.  Noninvasive Continuous Glucose Monitoring Using a Multisensor-Based Glucometer and Time Series Analysis.

Authors:  Zhanxiao Geng; Fei Tang; Yadong Ding; Shuzhe Li; Xiaohao Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.